Jump to content

Talk:McBoyle v. United States

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Cdogsimmons (talk | contribs) at 00:56, 30 May 2008 (added assessment). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconU.S. Supreme Court cases Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is part of WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases, a collaborative effort to improve articles related to Supreme Court cases and the Supreme Court. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

This was found at the bottom of the article page:

THE GIVEN INTERPRETATION OF THIS DECISION IS INCORRECT. THE COURT REVERSED THE DECISION OF THE LOWER COURTS CLAIMING, IN THE QUOTE ABOVE, THAT IF LEGISLATORS WANT TO MAKE AN IMPACT WITH THEIR LAWS THEN THEY NEED TO MAKE THEIR STATUES MORE SPECIFIC. HOLMES CLAIMS THAT BECAUSE THE STATUE EXPLICITLY TALKS ABOUT THOSE VEHICLES SECURED TO THE GROUND THAT AIRPLANES ARE NOT INCLUDED IN THIS STATUTE.

Umm, I'm unable to determine what exactly in the article you are disputing! It sounds like you're agreeing with the article yet saying it's wrong. Maybe you're saying that the article is not complete? Sure, that's what the "this is a stub" means. I can find every fact mentioned in the article in the decision (at, e.g., [1]) so I'm removing the disputed tag. Derobert 15:32, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]