Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tom Vallance (writer)

Questionable notability, no directly referenced sources. --/Mendaliv/^2¢/_Δ's/ 00:51, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note discussion is red-linked from article, attempting to fix with this cmt. _{TravellingCari}^{the Busy Bee} 02:04, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 23:02, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Delete. Notability not even asserted, much less demonstrated. Qworty (talk) 10:05, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep. Identifying the subject of the article as a regular writer/columnist/reviewer for at least two major publications, as well as the author of two books in his journalistic area, is certainly an assertion of notability. While Vallance apparently did his most substantial work in the preWeb area, even a rudimentary Google search turns up, for example, a description of him as an "expert" in his field from reliable sources, eg [1]. The Enchantress Of Florence (talk) 04:50, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]