Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/K-Rino

Fails WP:MUSIC. Has several albums, but none on a major label or notable indy. Mdsummermsw (talk) 14:23, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I added one of his albums. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 17:43, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete both The artist is not notable in any way. I have not found any reliable sources pertaining to him or his albums. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 17:47, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 17:48, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not notable. Guitardude3600 (talk) 20:43, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Seemingly vast body of work (for such an "unknown"). The must come a point where an artist is notable no matter what label he's on. Malla nox 21:36, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete this artist is not notable in any way. I am confused by the comment above by Mallanox, it does not matter how many albums this person has released if no one is buying them. If this were about an author who self published 12 books on multi-level marking I'm sure the article would be deleted already. The point is that there is no third party coverage on this artist because he is not a "prominent" musician of any sort, contrary to the peacock phrased introduction of the article. JBsupreme (talk) 06:56, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]