Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2008 March 27

< March 26	March 28 >

March 27

Image:Foxikethevoama.jpg

No evidence permissin was granted to release the image under the GFDL. Nv8200p talk 00:05, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:DoosanCorpHQ.jpg

Questionable GFDL claim while the source URL is inaccessible. Jusjih (talk) 00:41, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Park_Seung-jik_Store.JPG

Questionable GFDL claim while the source URL is inaccessible. Jusjih (talk) 00:41, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:NPSteamGenerator.JPG

Questionable GFDL claim while the source URL is inaccessible. Jusjih (talk) 00:42, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Mecatec_OilRefiningDevice.JPG

Questionable GFDL claim while the source URL is inaccessible. Jusjih (talk) 00:42, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Citizenship.jpg

The uploader overwritten twice and removed license unexplained. Jusjih (talk) 00:44, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:M-84Dtestiranjepp5dd5rweyhfd62.jpg

As author is the Ministry of Defence named (the Ministry of Defence of what country?) but in the field "source" stands "Private photo taken from slunj testing grounds"... Chaddy (talk) 02:38, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:M-84upgrades20pp5d6.jpg

As author is the Croatian ministry of defence named but there is a weblink to http://www.mycity.co.yu in the image... Chaddy (talk) 02:41, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:2515302920098595290CPepSf ph.jpg

The alleged permission is there, but I can´t read it... Another user, User:Mic of orion has uploaded several similar images (also from the Croatian Ministry of Defence) with this link and the annotation that he has the permission to use them on wiki or for educational purposes. So in fact these images are not free and have been already deleted. And that´s why I think this image is also not free. Chaddy (talk) 02:55, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Hlika22ogere8so.jpg

The alleged permission is there, but I can´t read it... Another user, User:Mic of orion has uploaded several similar images (also from the Croatian Ministry of Defence) with this link and the annotation that he has the permission to use them on wiki or for educational purposes. So in fact these images are not free and have been already deleted. And that´s why I think this image is also not free. Chaddy (talk) 02:56, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:2913683890098595290WvPjxf ph.jpg

The alleged permission is there, but I can´t read it... Another user, User:Mic of orion has uploaded several similar images (also from the Croatian Ministry of Defence) with this link and the annotation that he has the permission to use them on wiki or for educational purposes. So in fact these images are not free and have been already deleted. And that´s why I think this image is also not free. Chaddy (talk) 02:56, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:13997140 362432.jpg

Appears to be lifted from a film. Also uploader appears to be either a professional photographer/filmmakers, or is just mistagging images. Optigan13 (talk) 03:00, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Cutei.jpg

Appears to be lifted from a film. Also uploader appears to be either a professional photographer/filmmakers, or is just mistagging images. Optigan13 (talk) 03:02, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Zhang-Ziyi-red-carpet-picture-2i.jpg

Appears to be lifted from a film. Also uploader appears to be either a professional photographer/filmmakers, or is just mistagging images. Optigan13 (talk) 03:04, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Vicky-Zhao4i.jpg

Appears to be lifted from a film. Also uploader appears to be either a professional photographer/filmmakers, or is just mistagging images. Optigan13 (talk) 03:06, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:GetImage73i.jpg

Appears to be lifted from a film. Also uploader appears to be either a professional photographer/filmmakers, or is just mistagging images. Optigan13 (talk) 03:07, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:NRHS campus.JPG

Claims to be self-made, but it is a satellite photo. BlueAzure (talk) 04:29, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Akon.jpeg

Appears to be a copyvio. It seems the uploader didn't snap the picture himself. — Spellcast (talk) 10:46, 27 March 2008 (UTC).[reply]

Image:Rock2Wgtn_2008.JPG

Concert Image Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:57, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This image was taken by me at the concert, what's the problem? - Robrob5 (talk) 10:46, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Did you have permission from the concert's organisers? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:14, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Did everyone else get permission from concert organisers for the concert images contained in other wikipedia articles? - Robrob5 (talk) 22:43, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Saying it's from a concert doesn't inherently make in unfree. Considering it free for now. Wizardman 22:37, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Wehrmacht-Pocketbattleship-Graf-Spee-in-Montevideo-harbour.jpg

Impossible to confirm GFDL status on source site Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:58, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Faizpur_Interchange.jpg

Arieal - Possibly Yahoo or Google? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:02, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Angel Dubai2.jpg

According to the image description, the uploader must be asked for the permission to use the image in conflict with the CC/GFDL license. User also uploaded Image:Angel in Dubai.jpg --Geniac (talk) 14:48, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Silver_Britannia_2007.jpg

British coin or medallion.. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:59, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:MilkandCookies Master Monkey Bakers Theme.jpg

Tagged with both {{self|GFDL-no-disclaimers|cc-by-2.5}} and {{Non-free web screenshot}}. Unless the uploader actually holds the copyright to the Web page in question, the {{self}} tag has no merit. —Bkell (talk) 15:00, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, according to the uploader's talk page, he is the copyright holder of this Web page. If this is true, then the {{Non-free web screenshot}} tag should be removed. —Bkell (talk) 15:03, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done Wizardman 22:50, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Gold_Britannia_2003.jpg

No evidence of CC type release on source site listed - British coin or medallion Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:10, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:2008ElizabethI5A.jpg

British coin or medallion Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:20, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:2008Charles60th5A.jpg

British coin or medallion... Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:21, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:CastleHillGardens.jpg

No evidence that this was released under a CC license, uploader appears to have just found the first thing that would stop the image being deleted Stifle (talk) 16:57, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

See also Wikipedia:Image copyright help desk#CastleHillGardens.jpg. Permission claimed to be received, but no OTRS and permission for what unknown. MECU≈talk 18:18, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have read the article on permission and have sent a request today to the copyright holder for an email with the appropriate language granting a GNU Free Documentation License and will forward the email upon receipt Jdgowdy (talk) 15:17, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Wot_logo_slogan_medium.png

GFDL license given but uploader also claims image is owned by a company and covered by copyright and trademark protection. Believe uploader works for company but no assertion of permission to release is made. If unfree there may be a fair use rationale for this one but not sure if we can accept that from a company representative (how can they give "fair use" permission?). — SiobhanHansa 19:23, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

**Update on Image:Wot_logo_slogan_medium.png

I have changed the copyright info for Image:Wot logo slogan medium.png. EhJJ has OK'd it. Can the notice please be removed from under the logo? Debsalmi (talk) 11:48, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep all seems reasonable from Fair Use. I urge that we close this and remove the notice. Widefox (talk) 09:01, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - the Fair Use rationale is now perfectly acceptable UKWikiGuy (talk) 12:35, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was Result --John Vandenberg ^(chat) 06:41, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Dangerous_websites_by_category_pie_chart.png

GFDL license given but uploader also claims image is owned by a company and covered by copyright and trademark protection. Believe uploader works for company but no assertion of permission to release is made. — SiobhanHansa 19:23, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Permission request sent to OTRS 1.4.08 - Ticket#2008040110010787 Debsalmi (talk) 06:38, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep OTRS ticket 2008040110010787 covers this. John Vandenberg (talk) 22:45, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Image:WOT_Web_of_Trust_-_Rating_Screen.jpg

GFDL license given but uploader also claims image is owned by a company and covered by copyright and trademark protection. Believe uploader works for company but no assertion of permission to release is made. — SiobhanHansa 19:23, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Permission request sent to OTRS 1.4.08 - awaiting ticket number Debsalmi (talk) 06:38, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OTRS ticket 2008040110010787 mentions this image, however the image contains elements which are not the work of WOT, and so the image permission obtained is insufficient to cover the entire work. I recommend that either a different image is created, using only elements which are in the public domain or covered by free licenses, or a WP:Fair use rationale is added to this image. John Vandenberg (talk) 22:49, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Added Fair Use rationale Debsalmi (talk) 06:59, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I would prefer to see the still from a highly recognised film replaced with a different backdrop, as it isnt necessary to see Matt Damon in order to understand how WOT works. Keep in mind that we are building an encyclopedia not just for today readers, but for their great grandchildren and beyond, who are unlikely to have seen or heard of the Borne Trilogy. If you do think that recognition of the movie is important to grasp how the software works, you could use the main page of a uber notable movie, i.e. this page, rather than a still from the movie itself.

The ideal backdrop would be Revolution OS [1] :-) John Vandenberg ^(chat) 09:43, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:WOT_Web_of_Trust_-_Search_Screen.jpg

GFDL license given but uploader also claims image is owned by a company and covered by copyright and trademark protection. Believe uploader works for company but no assertion of permission to release is made. — SiobhanHansa 19:23, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Permission request sent to OTRS 1.4.08 - awaiting ticket number Debsalmi (talk) 06:38, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OTRS ticket 2008040110010787 mentions this image, however the image contains elements which are not the work of WOT, specifically the Microsoft Windows XP theme (the Google logo is not covered by copyright afaik), and so the image permission obtained is insufficient to cover the entire work. I recommend that either the image is cropped so that it only contains the Google webpage, or a WP:Fair use rationale is added to this image. John Vandenberg (talk) 22:54, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

added Fair Use rationale Debsalmi (talk) 07:00, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
A cropped version has been created here Image:WOT Web of Trust - Search Screen1.jpg. It contains a fair-use rationale. Either it is GFDL or it is fair use. It can not be both. If it is GFDL, the logo becomes GFDL, because the image contains the WOT logo. John Vandenberg ^(chat) 09:29, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Removed fair use, and left GFDL. Debsalmi (talk) 09:28, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:7340schediphonportrait.jpg

http://www.usd.edu/smm/Exhibitions/Muzika/MuzikaSchediphon.html Samuell Lift me up or put me down 21:29, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]