Jump to content

Terri Schiavo case

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Linuxbeak (talk | contribs) at 18:28, 27 August 2005 (Reverted edits by Cornchips to last version by Raul654). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Theresa Marie "Terri" Schiavo (December 3, 1963 – March 31, 2005) was a woman from St. Petersburg, Florida, whose medical circumstances and attendant legal battles led to landmark court decisions, historic legislative initiatives, and intense media attention. On February 25, 1990, Schiavo experienced cardiac arrest and collapsed in her home, incurring massive brain damage resulting in a persistent vegetative state.

For many years following her collapse, her husband Michael Schiavo and her parents fought a legal battle for custody. The source of the dispute was that Michael wanted to end the life support keeping her alive, while her parents wanted it to continue. Michael Schiavo prevailed at all levels of the judiciary, however, and the gastric feeding tube keeping Schiavo alive was removed on March 18, 2005. Despite abortive intervention by the Republicans in Congress, legal options for Schiavo's parents ran out, and she died 13 days later, on March 31, 2005.

File:TerriSchiavo2.jpg
Terri Schiavo before her 1990 collapse.

Brief overview of 15-year history

On February 25, 1990, Schiavo (pronounced SHY-voh, IPA: /'ʃaɪvoʊ/) experienced cardiac arrest and collapsed in her home. Despite heroic resuscitative measures, she suffered severe brain damage from the ensuing cerebral hypoxia. She lapsed into a coma, which lasted for over two months, and spent the remaining fifteen years of her life in a condition diagnosed as an irreversible persistent vegetative state (PVS).

This diagnosis was disputed by Schiavo's parents, Robert and Mary Schindler, and became the center of a court battle. Eight neurologists examined Schiavo. Seven of these neurologists (Dr. Garcia J. Desousa, Dr. Jeffery M. Karp, Dr. James H. Barnhill, Dr. Thomas H. Harrison, Dr. Ronald Cranford, Dr. Melvin Greer, and Dr. Peter Bambakidis) diagnosed her to be in a PVS, a diagnosis supported by two guardians ad litem. One neurologist, Dr. William Hammesfahr, diagnosed her to be in a "minimally conscious state" (MCS). The court found Hammesfahr's diagnosis lacked credibility, noting that his vasodilatation therapy was not recognized in the medical community [1], and the court ruled Schiavo to be in a PVS.

Her parents vigorously appealed this decision, and litigation lasted several years. In every appeal, the courts affirmed the original decision that she was in a PVS and would not want to be kept on life support in her condition. The court ordered her gastric feeding tube removed. Appeals caused the feeding tube to be reinserted twice.

Schiavo's parents disputed many decisions made by her husband and legal guardian, Michael, as well as issues such as guardianship, level and type of care, end-of-life wishes, life support, and level of consciousness. Terri Schiavo's parents also accused their son-in-law of physical abuse and neglect, charges which were investigated several times by the Florida Department of Children and Families and found to be without basis.

The judicial and legislative battles over the removal of her feeding tube spawned considerable media coverage during the last few weeks of her life and sparked a fierce debate over bioethics, legal guardianship, federalism, and civil rights. David Gibbs III, the lead lawyer for Terri Schiavo’s parents, supported Vatican statements which condemned her treatment as euthanasia. Pope John Paul II stated that health care providers are morally obliged to provide food and water to patients in persistent vegetative states. This led to a challenge by Schiavo's parents, who requested a new trial about whether their daughter, as a devout Catholic, would wish to go against the Church's teaching. Judge Greer rejected their request.[2].

Schiavo's husband insisted that she had expressed her wishes not to be kept on life support with no hope for improvement.

During a trial in 2000, testimony was heard from witnesses on both sides to establish Schiavo's wishes regarding life support. The court determined that she had made "credible and reliable" statements that she wouldn't want to be "kept alive on a machine [with] no hope of improvement" and that her condition in a persistent vegetative state had "long since satisfied" the requirement that there be no hope of improvement. [3],

In 2003, guardian ad litem Dr. Jay Wolfson was appointed by Florida legislature to "deduce and represent the best wishes and bests interests" of Schiavo. He reported to Governor Jeb Bush that "the evidence that served as the basis for the decisions regarding Theresa Schiavo were firmly grounded within Florida statutory and case law, which clearly and unequivocally provide for the removal of artificial nutrition in cases of persistent vegetative states," and that the evidence regarding Schiavo's medical condition and intentions had been "deemed by the trier of fact to be clear and convincing." [4] "The reasonable degree of medical certainty associated with her diagnosis and prognosis is very high."

By March 2005, the court cases regarding Schiavo’s wishes regarding withdrawing life support had included a week-long trial; a seven-day evidentiary hearing; fourteen appeals and innumerable motions, petitions, and hearings in the Florida courts; five suits in Federal District Court; Florida legislation (Terri’s Law) that was struck down by the Florida Supreme Court; an effort by a congressional committee to overturn the state court judgment through the use of a committee subpoena; federal legislation (Palm Sunday Compromise) purporting to authorize petitioners to file suit in federal district court to raise issues of federal law under the U.S. Constitution; a decision by the court of appeals; and four denials from the United States Supreme Court, among others. [5]

The Florida Second District of Appeal explained that the determination that Schiavo would have wished to be removed from artificial feeding and hydration "has been subject to appeals and post judgment scrutiny of all varieties, and it remains a valid judgment pursuant to the laws and the constitution of this state. Not only has Mrs. Schiavo's case been given due process, but few if any similar cases have ever been afforded this heightened level of process." [6]

The Schindlers' legal disputes ended when the Supreme Court again refused to hear their case. Schiavo's feeding tube was removed a third and final time on March 18, 2005.

On March 23, another neurologist (Dr. William P. Cheshire Jr.) filed an affidavit questioning the PVS diagnosis. This was based on a visit he had made to Schiavo on March 14. Her parents filed a motion to the courts including the affidavit from Cheshire. The court found insufficient new evidence to appeal the ruling that Schiavo was in a PVS. She died on March 31 at around 9:05 a.m. EST. An autopsy report was released on June 15. Although an autopsy cannot confirm a clinical diagnosis related to a patient's level of consciousness, the pathologic findings of the autopsy were all consistent with someone in a PVS. [7] (pdf)

Early life

Schiavo was born Theresa Marie Schindler. Her parents named her after Saint Teresa of Avila. She grew up in the Huntingdon Valley area of Lower Moreland Township, Pennsylvania, a suburb of Philadelphia, as the eldest of three children; her younger siblings are Robert Jr. (Bobby) and Suzanne.

By her senior year in high school, Schiavo was overweight, with a height of 5 feet, 3 inches (160 cm) and a weight of around 200 pounds (91 kg). She went on a NutriSystem diet and lost about 55 pounds (25 kg). [8] She may have developed an eating disorder around this time in order to cope with her perceived weight problem. [9] In 1981, she graduated from Archbishop Wood High School, a private Catholic school in nearby Warminster.

She met Michael Schiavo in 1982 in a sociology class at Bucks County Community College in Newtown, Pennsylvania, where they were both students. He was her first boyfriend. After dating for five months, the couple became engaged. They were married on November 10, 1984, at Our Lady of Good Counsel Church in Southampton. They moved to St. Petersburg, Florida, in April 1986. Schiavo's parents also moved to St. Petersburg three months later. In Florida, she worked as an insurance claims clerk for the Prudential insurance company, and her husband was a restaurant manager. Schiavo's friends began to have suspicions about her eating habits. After meals out, she would immediately excuse herself to go to the bathroom. Michael Schiavo was aware of her unusual eating patterns, but did not realize their potential danger. [10]

In 1989, the Schiavos began visiting an obstetrician and receiving fertility services and counseling in the hopes of having a child. At this time her weight had dropped to 120 pounds, and she had stopped menstruating. However, the physician who examined her did not take a complete medical history, which might have indicated an eating disorder. [11]

Initial medical crisis

On the morning of February 25, 1990, at approximately 5:30 a.m. EST, Schiavo experienced cardiac arrest and collapsed in the hallway of the St. Petersburg apartment she shared with her husband. Firefighters and paramedics arriving in response to her husband's 911 call found her face down and unconscious in the hallway outside her bathroom. Attempts were made to resuscitate Schiavo, and she was defibrillated several times while she was transported to the Humana Northside Hospital. There, in order to keep her alive, she was intubated, ventilated, and eventually given a tracheotomy. She remained comatose for two and a half months. When she emerged from the coma, she never exhibited any evidence of higher cortical function. The long period of anoxia she sustained had led to profound brain injury (termed "anoxic-ischemic encephalopathy"); it destroyed those parts of the brain concerned with cognition, perception, and awareness. While initially fed by means of a nasogastric feeding tube, she eventually received a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) feeding tube—inserted through the abdominal wall.

The St. Petersburg police found nothing unusual inside the apartment, nor any signs of a struggle or a crime. No illegal drugs or alcohol were found in Schiavo's blood; a physical inspection did not find any sign of trauma to her head or face.[12]

The discharge summary from Humana Hospital stated that Schiavo had suffered a cardiac arrest and anoxic brain damage, accompanied by seizures, respiratory failure, and an injured knee from the fall.

For a time, it was believed that her cardiac arrest had been caused by an imbalance of electrolytes in her blood. On admission to hospital, her serum potassium level was noted to be very low, at 2.0 mEq/L; the normal range for adults is 3.5–5.0 mEq/L. It was speculated that her low potassium level had in turn been caused by an eating disorder: her medical chart contained a note that "she apparently has been trying to keep her weight down with dieting by herself, drinking liquids most of the time during the day and drinking about 10–15 glasses of iced tea." However, there has never been any hard evidence that Schiavo had an eating disorder, and furthermore, the low potassium could very well have been a spurious result caused by the intravascular administration of fluids during the attempt to resuscitate her.

The cause of her cardiac arrest has never been determined.

Rehabilitation efforts and the malpractice suit

On May 12, 1990, Schiavo was discharged to the College Park Skilled Care and Rehabilitation Facility. On June 30 she was transferred to Bayfront Hospital for further rehabilitation. She came home to her family in September; however, after becoming overwhelmed with her needs, the family sent her back to the College Park facility. In November, Mr. Schiavo took his wife to the University of California, San Francisco for an experimental procedure involving the placement of a thalamic stimulator implant in her brain. The experimental treatment took several months but was unsuccessful. Mr. Schiavo returned to Florida with her in January 1991 and admitted his wife to the Mediplex Rehabilitation Center (specializing in brain injuries) in Bradenton, Florida, often "taking her to parks and public places in hopes of sparking some recovery." There she received 24-hour care. On July 19, 1991, Schiavo was transferred to the Sable Palms Skilled Care Facility, where she received neurological testing and regular speech and occupational therapy until 1994.

On emerging from coma some two and a half months after her cardiac arrest, Schiavo entered an unusual state of altered consciousness. She regained a sleep-wake cycle, but never exhibited awareness of herself or environment. This peculiar state is a recognized consequence of coma following acute brain injury, and was diagnosed by the physicians taking care of Schiavo as a persistent vegetative state. Dr. Garcia J. Desousa, a board-certified neurologist in St. Petersburg, Florida, cared for Schiavo during her initial admission to hospital; both he and Dr. Victor Gambone, an internist and Schiavo family physician, independently made the diagnosis within approximately one year after Schiavo's cardiac arrest. Other neurologists—Drs. Jeffery M. Karp, James H. Barnhill, and Thomas H. Harrison—also examined Schiavo over the years and made the same diagnosis; they also shared a very poor opinion about her chances for recovery.

No dissent regarding Schiavo's condition or the PVS diagnosis was raised by any parties at this point.

From 1990 to 1993, Mr. Schiavo and the Schindlers enjoyed an amicable relationship.[13] The Schindlers even allowed Mr. Schiavo to live rent free in their condominium for several months. During this time, the Schindlers actively encouraged Mr. Schiavo to "get on with his life." He was encouraged by the Schindlers to date, and he introduced his in-law family to women he was dating.[14] On June 18, 1990, the court appointed Michael Schiavo as his wife's legal guardian. Michael Schiavo's appointment was undisputed by the Schindlers. [15]

In 1992, Mr. Schiavo, on behalf of Mrs. Schiavo and himself, brought a medical malpractice lawsuit against G. Stephen Igel, the obstetrician who had been treating Schiavo for infertility, claiming that his failure to test for an eating disorder had led to her current condition. At the conclusion of the trial, the jury found for the Schiavos and awarded Mrs. Schiavo $1,600,000 in damages and Mr. Schiavo $600,000 for loss of consortium. While on appeal, the case was settled (May 1992) for $700,000 and $300,000, respectively.[16] The court placed Mrs. Schiavo's award in a trust fund, which was controlled by a third party and covered her medical and legal expenses.

During the malpractice trial, Michael testified that he began studying nursing at St. Petersburg College around 1991. When asked why, he explained:

"Because I enjoy it and I want to learn more how to take care of Terri.... I see myself hopefully finishing school and taking care of my wife. ... I want to bring my wife home. ... I married my wife because I love her and I want to spend the rest of my life with her. I'm going to do that." [17]

Eventually, he became a respiratory therapist and emergency room nurse. [18]

On February 14, 1993, Mr. Schiavo and the Schindlers had a falling-out; Mr. Schiavo claimed the argument arose due to his refusal to share the settlement money with the Schindlers. The Schindlers claim that he failed to honor commitments he had previously made to seek aggressive treatments for his wife's condition. [19] The amicable relationship ended, and Mr. Schiavo and the Schindlers literally stopped speaking to each other. [20] Mr. Schiavo placed limits on how much time the Schindlers could spend with their daughter.

The Schindlers accused Michael of going back on his word that he wanted to "spend the rest of his life with Terri" once he decided to withdraw life support. However, according to a later report, Michael said he "essentially gave up hope that [Terri] would recover about four years after the accident."

In his decision in the 2000 trial to determine Terri's wishes, Judge George Greer wrote, "[i]t has been suggested that Michael Schiavo has not acted in good faith by waiting eight plus years to file the Petition which is under consideration. That assertion hardly seems worthy of comment other than to say that he should not be faulted for having done what those opposed to him want to be continued." [21])

Judge Greer also noted in that 2000 decision that, "...the unrebutted evidence remains that Terri Schiavo remains in a persistent vegetative state."

Guardianship challenged

In July 1993, the Schindlers began their first challenge to Mr. Schiavo's guardianship, and attempted to remove him as legal guardian. As part of the first challenge to Michael’s Guardianship, the court appointed John H. Pecarek as Guardian ad litem to determine if there had been any abuse by Michael Schiavo. His report, issued March 1, 1994, found no inappropriate actions and indicated that Michael had been very attentive to Theresa. After two more years of legal contention, the Schindlers' action against Michael was dismissed with prejudice. [22]

Proceedings concluded that there was no basis for the removal of Michael as Guardian. Further, it was determined that he had been very aggressive and attentive in his care of Theresa. His demanding concern for her well being and meticulous care by the nursing home earned him the characterization by the administrator as “a nursing home administrator’s nightmare”. [23]

Michael remained his wife's guardian. Efforts to remove him were attempted in subsequent years, but without success. [24]

Life-prolonging procedures

Under Florida law, every person—competent and incompetent—has the right to refuse medical treatment.[25] When a person is in a persistent vegetative state and there is no living will, the decision to withhold or withdraw life-prolonging procedures may be made by another. [26] Florida Statutes, Title XLIV, Chapter 765, § 101(10) defines life-prolonging procedures to be, in part, "any medical procedure, treatment, or intervention, including artificially provided sustenance and hydration, which sustains, restores, or supplants a spontaneous vital function." [27] Thus, in Florida, a feeding tube is a life-prolonging procedure (also known as life support).

PVS and the law

The diagnosis of a persistent vegetative state (or permanent vegetative state, as it has interchangeably been described by some physicians throughout the process—one is a subset of the other [28]) is central to the case. As cited above, the decision to terminate life prolonging procedures by a proxy or guardian has a principle requirement that the ward be in a persistent vegetative state.

Patients in a persistent vegetative state have severe brain damage and are in a state of "wakefulness without awareness." In many cases, the persistent vegetative state occurs after a coma, which is consistent with Schiavo having been in a coma following her collapse. Patients in a persistent vegetative state are usually considered to be unconscious and unaware. They may experience sleep-wake cycles or be in a state of chronic wakefulness. They may exhibit some behaviors that can be construed as arising from partial consciousness, including reflexive or random behaviors such as grinding of teeth, swallowing, smiling, shedding tears, grunting, moaning or screaming without any apparent external stimulus. They are unresponsive to external stimuli, except, possibly, painful stimuli.

Neurologists note that patients in a persistent vegetative state do not experience pain, hunger or thirst due to the removal of their feeding tube. [29]

The prognosis for recovery of awareness in PVS has been quantified, and, in general, the prognosis depends on the cause and duration of PVS. It is worse after cardiac arrest and after a long duration of PVS. Patients remaining in PVS for greater than three months after cardiac arrest have only a slight chance of recovery of awareness. Recovery of awareness is unprecedented after two years. With head injury causing PVS, the times necessary to show these levels of prognostic certainty are one year and five years, respectively. [30] [31]

"Do-not-resuscitate" order

In March 1994, after more than three years of trying both established and experimental therapies, Mr. Schiavo, according to guardian ad litem Wolfson, came to terms with his doctors' diagnosis of an irreversible persistent vegetative state, and transferred his wife to a Largo nursing home. In consultation with his wife's physician, he halted most therapy for his wife and entered a "do-not-resuscitate" (DNR) order, which he later rescinded after the Schindlers and the nursing home protested. Guardian ad litem Jay Wolfson (appointed after guardians ad litem Pecarek and Pearse below) wrote in his 2003 report that:

In early 1994 Theresa contracted a urinary tract infection and Michael, in consultation with Theresa's treating physician, elected not to treat the infection and simultaneously imposed a do-not-resuscitate order should Theresa experience cardiac arrest. When the nursing facility initiated an intervention to challenge this decision, Michael canceled the orders. Following the incident involving the infection, Theresa was transferred to another skilled nursing facility...
Michael's decision not to treat was based upon discussions and consultation with Theresa's doctor, and was predicated on his reasoned belief that there was no longer any hope for Theresa's recovery. It had taken Michael more than three years to accommodate this reality and he was beginning to accept the idea of allowing Theresa to die naturally rather than remain in the noncognitive, vegetative state.

Legally in a PVS

In May 1998, Mr. Schiavo filed a petition to discontinue life support for Schiavo which her parents opposed. Richard Pearse was appointed by the court as a second guardian ad litem, and on December 29, 1998, reported "Dr. [Jeffrey] Karp's opinion of the ward's condition and prognosis is substantially shared among those physicians who have recently been involved in her treatment." Pearse concluded from Karp's and Dr. Vincent Gambone's diagnosis of PVS [32] that Schiavo was legally in a persistent vegetative state as defined by Florida Statutes, Title XLIV, Chapter 765, § 101(12): [33]

(12) "Persistent vegetative state" means a permanent and irreversible condition of unconsciousness in which there is:
(a) The absence of voluntary action or cognitive behavior of any kind.
(b) An inability to communicate or interact purposefully with the environment.

Pearse found that there was no possibility of improvement but that Mr. Schiavo's decisions might have been influenced by the potential to inherit what remained of Schiavo's estate. Due to a lack of a living will and questions regarding Mr. Schiavo's credibility, Pearse recommended denying his petition to remove her feeding tube.

The issue of conflict of interest raised by guardian ad litem Pearse attached to the Schindlers as well, he reported, since, had they prevailed in the various litigation over guardianship, they as the presumed heirs-at-law would have inherited the remainder of Mrs. Schiavo's estate upon her death. [34]

End-of-life wishes – Schiavo I

Schiavo did not have a living will; therefore a trial was held during the week of January 24, 2000 to determine what her wishes would have been regarding life-prolonging procedures. Arguments from both sides of the issue were heard, with testimony from eighteen witnesses regarding her medical condition and her end of life wishes. Her parents claimed that Schiavo was a devout Roman Catholic who did not wish to violate the Church's teachings on euthanasia by refusing nutrition and hydration. Judge Greer issued his order granting Mr. Schiavo’s petition for authorization to discontinue artificial life support for his wife in February 2000. In this decision, the court found that Schiavo was in a persistent vegetative state and that she had made reliable oral declarations that she would have wanted the feeding tube removed. [35] (This decision was upheld by the Florida Second District Court of Appeal [36] (or "2nd DCA") and came to be known by the court as Schiavo I in its later rulings.)

The Schindler family issued a statement on June 16, 2005 concerning the medical examiner's report of Theresa's autopsy. In it, the Schindlers repeated their case, saying, "our family would encourage the media to remember that this case was allegedly about 'Terri’s choice.' There is absolutely no evidence that Terri wanted to die of dehydration, or that she believed that that the level of one’s disability gives anyone the moral and legal right to end another’s life." [37]

Oral feeding

Oral feeding is not considered a life prolonging procedure, and on or about March 2, 2000, the Schindlers filed a motion to permit oral feeding of Schiavo. Since clinical records indicate that Schiavo was not responsive to swallowing tests and required a feeding tube, [38] Judge Greer ruled that insufficient nutrition and hydration could be ingested orally to sustain Schiavo and denied the request. [39] The Medical Examiner in his report was more definitive and concluded that Schiavo could not have swallowed and thus could not have received sufficient nutrition or hydration by mouth to sustain life. [40]

Another Guardianship Challenge

The Schindlers challenged Michael's guardianship in 2000. The Schindlers' new evidence ostensibly reflected adversely on Michael Schiavo’s role as guardian. It related to his personal romantic life, the fact that he had relationships with other women, that he had allegedly failed to provide appropriate care and treatment for Theresa, that he was wasting the assets within the guardianship account, and that he was no longer competent to represent Theresa’s best interests. [41]

Michael was in a relationship with Jodi Centonze by this time, while still legally married to Terri. Michael and Jodi Centonze would have two children together. Michael denied wrongdoing in this matter, stating that the Schindlers had actively encouraged him to "get on with his life" and date since 1991. Michael said he chose not to divorce Terri and relinquish guardianship because he wanted to ensure her final wishes (to not be kept alive in a PVS) were carried out.

The court denied the Schindlers' motions to remove the guardian, allowing that the evidence was not sufficient and in some instances, not relevant. It set a date for the artificial life support to be discontinued: April 24, 2001. [42]

In his 2005 report to Governor Bush, guardian ad litem Jay Wolfson noted that during testimony: "members of the Schindler family voiced the disturbing belief that they would keep Theresa alive at any and all costs. Nearly gruesome examples were given, eliciting agreement by family members that in the event Theresa should contract diabetes and subsequent gangrene in each of her limbs, they would agree to amputate each limb, and would then, were she to be diagnosed with heart disease, perform open heart surgery. There was additional, difficult testimony that appeared to establish that despite the sad and undesirable condition of Theresa, the parents still derived joy from having her alive, even if Theresa might not be at all aware of her environment given the persistent vegetative state. Within the testimony, as part of the hypotheticals presented, Schindler family members stated that even if Theresa had told them of her intention to have artificial nutrition withdrawn, they would not do it. Throughout this painful and difficult trial, the family acknowledged that Theresa was in a diagnosed persistent vegetative state." [43]

In an appearance on ABC News's Nightline on March 15, 2005, Michael Schiavo cited the willingness that Schiavo's parents expressed to keep her alive by multiple extreme measures, including quadruple amputation if needed, as an important reason for denying transfer of guardianship to them or other parties with similar desires. [44]

Three appeals – Schiavo II

In April, 2001, the Schindlers filed a motion for relief from judgment citing new evidence of Terri's wishes. Judge Greer denied the motion as untimely under Rule 1.540(b)(5) of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure [45] (p. 65). The 2nd DCA upheld Greer's decision but remanded the issue in order to give the Schindlers an opportunity to file a new motion.

At about the same time, the Schindlers filed an action against Michael, which was assigned to another court. The judge, Frank Quesada, issued an injunction against removal of feeding tube. On appeal by Michael, the 2nd DCA reversed Judge Quesada's order.

Also in the same time frame, Michael filed a motion to enforce mandate of the guardianship court (that the feeding tube be removed). The 2nd DCA denied the motion. (These decisions, all published in a single order by Florida's Second District Court of Appeal [46], came to be known by the court as Schiavo II in its later rulings.)

Challenging the PVS diagnosis

In his 2003 report, guardian ad litem Dr. Jay Wolfson wrote "Until recently, while both Michael Schiavo and the Schindlers agreed that Theresa was in a persistent vegetative state, they could not agree as to the matter of discontinuation of life support. Recently, the Schindlers have adopted what appears to be a position that Theresa is not in a persistent vegetative state, and/or that they do not support the fact that such a medical state exists at all." [47]

After challenges to Schiavo's end-of-life wishes failed, after challenges to Michael's guardianship failed, the Schindlers adopted the position that Schiavo was not in a PVS and began to challenge that diagnosis in court.

Schiavo's parents claim that their daughter did not meet the definition of a persistent vegetative state, and was in a "minimally conscious state" instead. Her parents argue that at times her actions were indicative of responses to external stimuli, not reflex or instinctive behavior. For example, the Schindlers claim that their daughter smiled, laughed, cried, moved, made childlike attempts at speech, and attempted to say "Mom" or "Dad"; or "yeah" when they asked her a question. They claim that when they kissed her she looked at them and sometimes puckered her lips.

Hearing ordered – Schiavo III

On 10 August 2001, on remand from the 2nd DCA, Judge Greer heard a motion from the Schindlers claiming that new medical treatment could restore sufficient cognitive ability that Terri herself would decide to continue life-prolonging measures. The court also heard motions from the Schindlers to remove the guardian (Michael) and to require Judge Greer to recuse himself. Judge Greer denied the motions and the Schindlers appealed to the 2nd DCA.

On 17 October, the Court of Appeal affirmed the denials of the motions to remove and recuse, but found that although their previous opinion had misled the guardianship court, they would remand the question of Terri's wishes and require an evidentiary hearing be held. The court specified that five board certified neurologists were to testify, and said, "...the Schindlers may choose two doctors to participate in discovery and present their opinions at evidentiary hearing. In addition, to control the scope of this hearing and to prevent the proverbial "war of experts," Mr. Schiavo may introduce in rebuttal the testimony of two doctors of his choosing. ...we further conclude that the trial court should appoint a new independent physician to examine and evaluate Mrs. Schiavo's current condition. ...In the event that counsel are unable to stipulate to the selection of a new physician for the purposes of this independent examination, the trial court shall make the selection." (These decisions, all published in a single order by the Florida Second District Court of Appeal [48], came to be known by the court as Schiavo III in its later rulings.)

PVS diagnosis ruling – Schiavo IV

In October 2002, on remand by the Second District Court of Appeal, an evidentiary hearing was held in Judge Greer's court to determine whether new therapy treatments could help Schiavo restore any cognitive function. In preparation for the trial, a new computed axial tomography scan (CAT scan) was performed, which showed severe cerebral atrophy. An EEG showed no measurable brain activity. The court viewed a six-hour tape of Schiavo and concluded that her vegetative condition was factual and not subject to legal dispute.

In accordance with the 2nd DCA's instructions, five doctors were selected to provide their expert testimony to the trial: two by Schiavo's parents, two by Mr. Schiavo, and one to have been selected by mutual agreement of the parties:

  • The Schindler family selected Dr. William Maxfield (the Schindlers' family doctor, who was a radiologist) and Dr. William Hammesfahr (a neurologist).
  • Michael Schiavo selected Dr. Ronald Cranford and Dr. Melvin Greer (no relation, and both neurologists).
  • The parties having failed to agree, the court selected Dr. Peter Bambakidis (also a neurologist).

These five doctors examined Schiavo's medical records, brain scans, the videos, and Schiavo herself. Drs. Cranford, Greer, and Bambakidis testified to their conclusion that Schiavo was in a persistent vegetative state. Drs. Maxfield and Hammesfahr testified to their conclusion that she was in a minimally conscious state.

Judge Greer ruled that Schiavo was in a PVS, and was beyond hope of significant improvement. The trial court order was particularly critical of Hammesfahr's testimony which claimed positive results in similar cases by use of vasodilation therapy, the success of which is unsupported in the medical literature. [49]

Little detail of testimony from the individual physicians in the hearing is extant beyond that cited in the Judge Greer's order, although salient points by Dr. Cranford can be read in an article in "Florida Today" (the article cites the wrong date for the exam). He was quoted in that article as saying, "[Schiavo] has no electrical activity in her cerebral cortex on an EEG (electroencephalogram), and a CT (computerized tomography) scan showed massive atrophy in that region." [50])

Florida's 2nd District Court of Appeal, in its order affirming Judge Greer, said, "this court has closely examined all of the evidence in the record," and "we have...carefully observ[ed] the video tapes in their entirety." The court concluded that "...if we were called upon to review the guardianship court's decision de novo we would still affirm it." (this decision by the 2nd DCA [51] came to be known as Schiavo IV in later rulings.)

Six hours of video

Schiavo's parents contend that her behavior in this image from one of the videos released by her parents showed that she was aware of the people around her. Most neurologists who examined Schiavo disagreed, saying that her level of brain damage made responsiveness impossible and that her behavior represented reflex or instinctive actions.

As part of the October 2002 court ordered medical exam, six hours of video of Schiavo were taped and filed at the Pinellas County courthouse. The tape included Schiavo with her mother and neurologist William Hammesfahr. The entire tape was viewed by Judge Greer, who wrote, Schiavo "clearly does not consistently respond to her mother". From that six hours of video, the Schindlers and their supporters produced six clips totaling four and a half minutes and released those clips to public websites. [52]

Bone scan

A bone scan [53] performed in March 1991 showed, according to the radiologist who evaluated it, that Schiavo had suffered prior traumatic injuries to multiple ribs (on both sides), to both sacroiliac joints, both knees, both ankles, several thoracic vertebrae, and to her right thigh, in addition to a minor compression fracture of the L1 vertebra. Schiavo's parents did not know of the existence of this scan until November 2002, twelve years after her brain damage and entry into an incapacitated state. Forensic pathologist Dr. Michael Baden, provided with the scan but not with her history, suggested that physical trauma, specifically a head injury, probably caused Schiavo's collapse [54], though in a later interview [55], after learning her history, he agreed that the bulimia/hypokalemia explanation was also possible. Others argue that the trauma is consistent with her cardiac arrest, fall, CPR attempts and eventual resuscitation.

Schiavo's parents claim that she had been battered by her husband. Upon becoming aware of the bone scan report possibly suggesting previous abuse, the Schindlers petitioned the Pinellas-Pasco Circuit Court for a full evidentiary hearing to evaluate the new evidence. On November 22, 2002, Judge Greer denied the motion, stating that the issue of trauma 12 years earlier was irrelevant to the current case. [56]

Florida's Department of Children and Families investigated 89 complaints of abuse dating back to 2001, when Schiavo's feeding tube was removed for the first time. In a report released on April 15, 2005, state investigators concluded that "there is no evidence to support allegations of any neglect or abuse." [57]

The autopsy carried out after Schiavo's death found only one fracture, the minor compression fracture in the L1 vertebra, which Thogmartin, the medical examiner who led the autopsy, said was probably caused by osteoporosis. [58] Thogmartin also concluded that misleading information on the bone scan request form was the likely genesis of questions of trauma raised earlier (a well documented and thorough rebuttal of the claim of trauma suffered by Schiavo is found on pages 32–34 of the report but is beyond the scope of this article). [59]

Galaxywave

In an effort to improve Schiavo's condition, her father contacted Galaxywave, Inc.[60]—psychic healers who claim to possess a Remote Healing ADAM (Aphysical Dimension Access Manager) Technology. [61]. From November 2002 until February 2003, Schiavo received daily, hour-long sessions from Galaxywave. [62] [63]

2003 petition

On September 11, 2003, the Schindlers petitioned the court to forestall removal of the feeding tube to provide for "eight weeks' therapy." Accompanying the petition were four affidavits from members of the Schindler family and one from Dr. Alexander T. Gimon. At the hearing the Schindlers' counsel read into the record additional affidavits from three speech professionals and two nurses.

One of the nurses, Carla Sauer Iyer claimed in her affidavit that her initial training in 1996 consisted solely of the instruction, "do what Michael Schiavo tells you or you're terminated." She also claimed that Mr. Schiavo said "when is that bitch gonna die?" and that he made many other similar statements. She stated that on five different occasions, she tested Schiavo's blood sugar levels after Mr. Schiavo visited her, and she found that her blood sugar levels were so low it wouldn't even register a number. She stated that it was medically possible that Michael injected his wife with insulin in an attempt to kill her. Iyer stated that standing orders were not to contact the Schindler family, but that she "would call them anyway." Iyer stated that she eventually called the police and was fired the next day.

On September 17, Judge Greer denied the petition, and wrote that "the Petition is an attempt by Mr. and Mrs. Schindler to relitigate the entire case. It is not even a veiled or disguised attempt. The exhibits relied upon by them clearly demonstrate this to be true."

Regarding Iyer's claims, Greer wrote that they were "incredible to say the least" and that "Ms. Iyer details what amounts to a 15-month cover-up (April 1995 through July 1996) which include the staff of Palm Garden of Largo Convalescent Center, the Guardian of the Person, the guardian ad litem, the medical professionals, the police, and believe it or not, Mr. and Mrs. Schindler. It is impossible to believe that Mr. and Mrs. Schindler would not have subpoenaed Ms. Iyer for the January 2000 evidentiary hearing had Iyer contacted them (in 1996) as her affidavit alleges." [64]

Wolfson Report

On 15 October 2003, Schiavo's feeding tube was removed. Six days later, following the passing of "Terri's Law", Florida Governor Jeb Bush sent armed men to remove Schiavo from the hospice. She was taken to a hospital, where her feeding tube was surgically reinserted. [65] Part of the legislation required the appointment of a guardian ad litem, Dr. Jay Wolfson, to "deduce and represent the best wishes and best interests" of Schiavo, and report them to Governor Bush.

In December, 2003, Wolfson submitted his report, referring to himself in third person as "the GAL":

"In the month during which the GAL conducted research, interviews and compiled information, he sought to visit with Theresa as often as possible, sometimes daily, and sometimes, more than once each day. During that time, the GAL was not able to independently determine that there were consistent, repetitive, intentional, reproducible interactive and aware activities. When Theresa’s mother and father were asked to join the GAL, there was no success in eliciting specific responses. Hours of observed video tape recordings of Theresa offer little objective insight about her awareness and interactive behaviors. There are instances where she appears to respond specifically to her mother. But these are not repetitive or consistent. There were instances during the GAL’s visits, when responses seemed possible, but they were not consistent in any way."

"The GAL concludes from the medical records and consultations with medical experts that the scope and weight of the medical information within the file concerning Theresa Schiavo consists of competent, well documented information that she is in a persistent vegetative state with no likelihood of improvement, and that the neurological and speech pathology evidence in the file support the contention that she cannot take oral nutrition or hydration and cannot consciously interact with her environment."

"Until recently, while both Michael Schiavo and the Schindlers agreed that Theresa was in a persistent vegetative state, they could not agree as to the matter of discontinuation of life support. Recently, the Schindlers have adopted what appears to be a position that Theresa is not in a persistent vegetative state, and/or that they do not support the fact that such a medical state exists at all."

"Of the Schindlers, there has evolved the unfortunate and inaccurate perception that they will “keep Theresa alive at any and all costs” even if that were to result in her limbs being amputated. During the course of the GAL’s investigation, the Schindlers allow that this is not accurate, and that they never intended to imply a gruesome maintenance of Theresa at all costs."

"Of Michael Schiavo, there is the incorrect perception that he has refused to relinquish his guardianship because of financial interests, and more recently, because of allegations that he actually abused Theresa and seeks to hide this. There is no evidence in the record to substantiate any of these perceptions or allegations."

"The GAL concludes that the trier of fact and the evidence that served as the basis for the decisions regarding Theresa Schiavo were firmly grounded within Florida statutory and case law, which clearly and unequivocally provide for the removal of artificial nutrition in cases of persistent vegetative states, where there is no advance directive, through substituted/proxy judgment of the guardian and/or the court as guardian, and with the use of evidence regarding the medical condition and the intent of the parties that was deemed, by the trier of fact to be clear and convincing."

Oral feeding II

On February 23, 2005, the Schindlers filed a motion for "Relief from Judgment Pending Contemporary Medical-Psychiatric-Rehabilitative Evaluation." [66] The Schindlers wanted to reinsert Schiavo's feeding tube so that she could be tested with an fMRI and given a swallowing therapy called VitalStim. The motion was accompanied by thirty-three affidavits from doctors in several specialties, speech pathologists and therapists, and a few neuropsychologists, all urging that new tests be undertaken [67] [68]

On February 25, Judge Greer denied the motion and issued an order which excluded both feeding by tube and orally, and set a time and date for the removal of the feeding tube. [69]

On February 28, the Schindlers filed a motion for "Permission to Provide Terri with Food and Water by Natural Means." This second motion asked for permission to "attempt to feed" Schiavo by mouth. [70]

On March 8, Judge Greer denied the second motion, saying "it has become clear that the [second] motion is part and parcel of [the previous] motion on medical evaluation. The same declarations are being used for both motions and the motion appears to be an alternative pleading to the [previous] motion. Both are asking for an experimental procedure." The first motion requested that Schiavo be given VitalStim swallowing therapy. The second motion simply asked permission to attempt to feed her by mouth, asserting that she might be able to swallow naturally. Greer then explained that if the first motion is approved, then the second one isn't needed, and if the first one is denied, the second one would be denied as well. [71] This was the second time that oral feeding had been denied. [72]

On March 9, Judge Greer denied the Schindlers' first motion for the experimental testing and swallowing therapy, citing that an affiant doctor for Mr. Schiavo cautioned that fMRI was an experimental procedure that should be conducted in an academic setting, because Schiavo had already undergone swallowing tests and failed [73], and because VitalStim had only been performed on patients who were not in a PVS. Greer noted that "most of the doctor affidavits submitted are based on their understanding of Schiavo's condition from news reports or video clips they have seen. Many are obviously not aware of the medical exams undertaken for the 2002 trial... The Court cannot see how the [Schindlers] have met the burden established by Schiavo III... They are not alleging that any new treatment exists that would significantly improve the quality of her life so that [Schiavo] would reverse the prior decision to withdraw life-prolonging procedures." [74]

No stay was granted by the appellate courts, and on March 18, 2005, Schiavo's feeding tube was removed the third and final time.

Emergency Motion

An emergency motion to restore the feeding tube was filed by Barbara Weller, the Schindlers' co-attorney, who stated that 20 minutes before the tube was removed, and in response to their attempts to coach her, Schiavo "managed to articulate the first two vowel sounds, first articulating AHHHHHHH and then virtually screaming WAAAAAAAA." Schiavo had been aphasic since her cardiac arrest in 1990. Weller asserted that she had told Schiavo that she would die unless she said, "I want to live." The alleged incident occurred only in the presence of family members and has not been independently confirmed; the police officer stationed outside the room said she could not recall hearing the vocalization. Judge George Greer said that Schiavo's utterances came only after being touched, which was consistent with evidence presented in 2002. "All of the credible medical evidence this court has received over the last five years is that this is not a cognitive response, but rather something akin to a person jerking his/her hand off a hot stove long before he/she has thought about it," Greer wrote. [75]

According to a December 29, 1998 report submitted by the second guardian ad litem, Richard Pearse, nursing home staff members observed the same reactions claimed by the Schindlers, except the staff noted that Schiavo's responses were random, coincidental, and unrelated to any external stimuli. However, the report did note two consistent responses: Schiavo responded to deep pain stimuli by moaning, and she opened her eyes in response to noise.

Dr. Cheshire

On March 23, 2005, Dr. William Cheshire Jr., a neurologist and consultant at the Mayo Clinic in Jacksonville and Assistant Professor of Neurology at Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, filed an affidavit after visiting Schiavo. [76] Cheshire graduated from, and is an adjunct professor at Trinity University, a Christian institution, and has written opinion articles on stem-cell research and other scientific debates from a conservative Christian viewpoint. [77] In his affidavit, Cheshire explains that he had been asked by the Florida Dept. of Children and Families [78] to investigate allegations of abuse of Schiavo five days after her feeding tube had been removed. Cheshire reported no abuse was found. His visit lasted 90 minutes and consisted only of visual observation, not a medical exam. During his visit, he observed what he interpreted to be purposeful behavior, as when he stated that Schiavo appeared to be watching him for "about half a minute."[79] (Schiavo's autopsy[80], performed two weeks after Cheshire's visit, concluded she was cortically blind.) Cheshire's affidavit said he believed he had found reason to doubt the PVS diagnosis and to prefer a diagnosis of "minimally conscious state" or MCS. Based on Cheshire's affidavit, Governor Jeb Bush filed a petition to have Schiavo's feeding tube restored. [81]

CT scans

Left: Scan of normal 25-year-old's brain; Right: Schiavo's 2002 CT scan at age 38.

Three Florida neurologists viewed 12 of Schiavo's CT scans on March 22, 2005. [82] After viewing the scans, Dr. Leon Prockop (a professor and former chairman of the neurology department at the University of South Florida's College of Medicine) was quoted by the Sun-Sentinel as saying that Schiavo's scan exhibits the "most severe brain damage as I've ever seen." Dr. Walter Bradley, the chairman of neurology at the University of Miami's Miller School of Medicine, said that he "doubts there's any activity going on in the higher levels of her brain." Dr. Michael T. Pulley said, "The chance that this person is going to recover is about zero." [83] [84]

Public opinion and activism

Main article: Public opinion and activism in the Terri Schiavo case

The Terri Schiavo case held the attention of the American public, as well as an international audience, and had major political ramifications. A number of polls of public opinion were carried out, particularly on the question of federal involvement in the Terri Schiavo case, with conflicting results.

The case drew in notable figures on both sides of the debate, as well as many pressure groups and public protesters. Two of the more extreme acts of protest included death threats aimed towards Michael Schiavo, although the vast majority of protests were nonviolent.

The Schindlers' legal fight was funded by a variety of sources on the political right. [85]

On March 11, 2005, media tycoon Robert Herring (who believes that stem cell research could have cured Schiavo's condition) offered one million dollars to Michael Schiavo if he agreed to waive his guardianship to his wife's parents [86]. The offer was rejected. George Felos, attorney for Michael, described the offer as "offensive." He also stated that Michael had rejected other monetary offers, including one of ten million dollars.

During the final stages of the court battle in March 2005, around 30 individuals made a variety of complaints to the Department of Children and Families alleging various abuses. These included Terri supposedly being in pain from recent dental work, Terri not having had any dental work for years, and even the blinds in her room not being open wide enough. DCF investigators found the claims to be groundless, stating that there were "no indicators" of abuse in any of the cases and concluding that "[t]he preponderance of the evidence shows that Michael Schiavo followed doctors' orders [regarding] Ms. Schiavo's diagnosis of being in a persistent vegetative state and that he provided her with appropriate care." [87]

Government involvement

Main article: Government involvement in the Terri Schiavo case

Terri's Law

Both the state and federal government made use of extraordinary measures to support the Schindlers. In October 2003, when the Schindlers' final appeal was exhausted, the Florida Legislature passed "Terri's Law," [88]giving Governor Jeb Bush the authority to intervene in the case. Bush immediately ordered the feeding tube reinserted, but Judge Baird [89] and the Florida Supreme Court [90] both overturned the law as unconstitutional.

Congressional subpoenas

On March 18, 2005, after the order to remove the feeding tube was given by Judge Greer, Republicans in Congress subpoenaed both Michael and Terri Schiavo to testify at a congressional hearing [91] (it is contempt of Congress to prevent or discourage congressional witnesses from testifying [92]). Greer opted to ignore the subpoenas, telling congressional attorneys over a conference call that, "I have had no cogent reason why the (congressional) committee should intervene." He also stated that last-minute action by Congress does not invalidate years of court rulings. [93] [94] Although Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, Senator Rick Santorum, and Representative Tom Delay, brought the possibility of sanctioning Greer on charges of contempt of Congress, Congress did not attempt to enforce the subpoenas or take any action against Greer.

Palm Sunday Compromise

Main article: Palm Sunday Compromise

Governor Bush and Congressional Republicans anticipated Greer's adverse ruling well before it was delivered and worked on a virtually daily basis to find an alternative means of overturning the legal process by utilizing the authority of the United States Congress. [95] On March 20, 2005, the Senate (with only three members present) passed their version of the resolution, followed by the House of Representatives, which came to be called the "Palm Sunday Compromise" (S-686), transferring jurisdiction of the Schiavo case to the federal courts. The bill passed the House on March 21 at 12:41 a.m. EST. President Bush flew to Washington from his vacation in Texas in order to sign the bill into law at 1:11 a.m. EST. As in the state courts, all of the Schindlers' federal petitions and appeals were denied, and the U.S. Supreme Court declined to grant certiorari, effectively ending the Schindlers' legal options.

Potential constitutional crisis

On March 24, 2005, Judge Greer denied a petition for intervention by the Department of Children & Families and signed an order forbidding the department from "taking possession of Theresa Marie Schiavo or removing her" from the hospice and directed "each and every and singular sheriff of the state of Florida" to enforce his order. The order was appealed to the Second District Court of Appeals the following day, which resulted in an automatic stay under state law. While the stay was in effect, Florida Department of Law Enforcement personnel prepared to take custody of Terri and transfer her to a local hospital for reinsertion of the feeding tube. Once Greer was made aware of the stay, he ordered it lifted and all parties stood down. Governor Bush decided to obey the court order despite enormous pressure from the political right. If Bush (or the Florida Legislature) had ignored Greer's order by attempting to remove Schiavo from the hospice, a confrontation between the Pinellas Park Police Department and the FDLE agents could have ensued. It has been speculated that this could have led to a standoff or a constitutional crisis. In jest, one official said local police discussed, "...whether we had enough officers to hold off the National Guard." [96]

Final stages

On March 26, 2005, Bob and Mary Schindler announced that their legal options had been exhausted. The next day, Schiavo was given the Anointing of the Sick ("Last Rites"). In accordance with the Catholic ritual of Viaticum, a drop of consecrated wine was applied to her tongue, but a small piece of the host was unable to be offered as her tongue was too dry. She had also been given Holy Communion through the feeding tube just before it was removed.

Terri Schiavo died at 9:05 a.m. EST on Thursday, March 31, 2005.

Michael Schiavo had arrived at 8:45 a.m. EST that day. Schiavo's brother, Bobby Schindler, was visiting Schiavo with his sister, Suzanne Vitadamo, but they were asked to leave ten minutes before Schiavo's death. Hospice officials asked the pair to leave in order for Schiavo to be examined. Bobby challenged the decision, but Michael Schiavo decided not to allow him to stay. Schiavo's parents, who had been denied access to her during her last hours, traveled to the hospice to visit her when they were informed that she may be approaching death, arriving half an hour after her death. The Schindler family was allowed into the room after Michael Schiavo had left it. [97] [98]

Autopsy

After her death, Schiavo's body was taken to the office of the medical examiner for Pinellas and Pasco counties. The autopsy was led on April 1, 2005 by Dr. Jon Thogmartin, the medical examiner for District 6; Dr. Stephen J. Nelson, the medical examiner for District 10, provided neuropathologic consultation. Dr. Thogmartin also arranged for specialized cardiac and genetic examinations to be made. The official autopsy report was released to intense public attention on June 15, 2005.

Examination of Schiavo’s nervous system had revealed extensive injury. The brain itself weighed 615 grams, only half the weight expected for a female of her age, height, and weight. There was a large volume of cerebrospinal fluid, weighing 678 grams—greater than the weight of her brain. Microscopic examination revealed extensive damage to numerous brain regions, including the cortex, the thalami, the basal nuclei, the hippocampus, the cerebellum, and the midbrain.

The neuropathologic changes in Schiavo’s brain were precisely of the type seen in patients who enter a PVS following cardiac arrest. Throughout the cerebral cortex, the large pyramidal neurons that comprise some 70% of cortical cells—critical to the functioning of the cortex—were completely lost. The pattern of gradient damage to the cortex, with injury tending to worsen from the front of the cortex to the back, is also a typical finding. There was marked damage to important relay circuits deep in the brain (the thalami)—this too a common pathologic hallmark of the PVS. The damage was, in the words of Dr. Thogmartin, "irreversible, and no amount of therapy or treatment would have regenerated the massive loss of neurons." [99]

The intensely controversial nature of Terri Schiavo's final years was likely not lost on the medical examiners, as seen by the care with which they worded their report. Dr. Nelson cautioned that a pathologic examination of the brain alone may not prove a diagnosis of a vegetative state. [100] The vegetative state is a behaviorally defined syndrome of complete unawareness, to self and to environment, that occurs in a person who nevertheless experiences wakefulness. As the condition is defined in clinical terms, it can therefore only be diagnosed in persons who, at some point, are shown to meet those clinical terms. Ancillary investigations, such as CT scans, MRI, EEGs, and lately fMRI and PET scanning, may only provide support for the clinical impression—as might the pathologic findings, after death. In the case of Terri Schiavo, seven of the eight neurologists who examined her in her last years stated that she met the clinical criteria for PVS; the serial CT scans, EEGs, the one MRI, and finally, the pathologic findings, were all consistent with that diagnosis.

The cause of the cardiac arrest which felled Schiavo fifteen years before she died has never been determined. Aside from a localized, healed inflammation, the cardiac pathologist who studied Schiavo's heart found it and the coronary vessels to be healthy. Although it was widely speculated that Schiavo suffered from an eating disorder that caused a serious electrolyte disturbance, stopping her heart, there is little evidence to support this claim. The examiners also found no evidence that Schiavo had been the victim of trauma or foul play.

To the question of the cause and manner of Schiavo’s death, Dr. Thogmartin wrote, "Mrs. Schiavo suffered severe anoxic brain injury. The cause of which [sic] cannot be determined with reasonable medical certainty. The manner of death will therefore be certified as undetermined."

Memorial

File:Terri Schiavo grave.jpg
Terri Schiavo's grave at Sylvan Abbey Memorial Park.

Schiavo's body was cremated following the autopsy.

Her parents offered a memorial Mass for her at the Holy Name of Jesus Catholic Church in Gulfport on April 5. Father Frank Pavone, an activist with Priests for Life, [101] delivered the main sermon. [102]

On May 7, Schiavo's parents made public a complaint that they had not been informed of when and where the ashes of their daughter had been (or were to be) buried by Michael Schiavo. He was under court order to provide this information to them.

On June 20, the cremated remains of Terri Schiavo were buried. The ceremony was fifteen minutes long and took place in a heavy rainstorm. A blue urn containing the ashes was placed in a lead box, along with two of Terri Schiavo's stuffed animals (both cats). The Schindlers' attorney stated that the family was notified by fax only after the memorial service; by then, the family had already started getting calls from reporters. [103]

The ashes were interred under an oak tree near a pond and fountain at Sylvan Abbey Memorial Park in Clearwater, Florida. Behind the grave marker sits a polished stone bench inscribed with the name "Schiavo." [104] On the flat bronze marker, Michael Schiavo had the following words inscribed:

SCHIAVO
THERESA MARIE
BELOVED WIFE
Born December 3, 1963
Departed this Earth
February 25, 1990
At peace March 31, 2005

Below these words is an engraving of a dove with an olive branch, with the words "I kept my promise" underneath.

Wikinews has related news:

Sources

Compilations
(legal documents relating to the Schiavo case)

Information sites

Articles

  • "Before fight over death, Terri Schiavo had a life." CNN. October 25, 2003. [105]
  • Fackelmann, Kathleen. "Schiavo not likely to experience a painful death, neurologists say." USA Today. March 23, 2005. [106]
  • Kumar, Anita. "The Terri Schiavo case: Before the circus." St. Petersburg Times. April 3, 2005. [107]
  • Quill, Timothy E., MD. "Terri Schiavo—A Tragedy Compounded." New England Journal of Medicine. 21 April 2005. [108]
  • Rufty, Bill. "Doctors lament misuse of proper terminology in Schiavo debate." The Ledger. March 23, 2005. [109]
  • Wilson, Jamie. "Schiavo autopsy vindicates husband." The Guardian, June 16, 2005. [110]

Legal documents
(PDF files, unless otherwise noted)

Advocacy and commentary

Template:Lived

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Terri_Schiavo_case&oldid=21973620"