Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Friendship
Appearance
Delete nn Big Brother cruft. An alliance formed on the show. TheMidnighters 20:09, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
- Strong delete. Note: this is NOT purported to be the title of an episode (even if it were, I would vote to merge it); neither are air dates mentioned. Notability is not established, or even asserted. Poorly titled for search purposes (who is going to look up this information using that title?!). Hot and crufty. We must reign in reality TV ephemera, people. We must question the Wikithink that it's notable simply because it's on TV. That is a patently subjective, non-verifiable dictum. Paul Klenk 20:20, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
- hear hear! But why limit it just to reality tv? Delete Dottore So 02:24, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
- Hark at the man. Reality TV is a virulent disease that this encyclopedia is better off without. I say Delete it. --Agamemnon2 07:20, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
- delete Could possibly be made useful, but original poster wants to make it a love letter to the Friendsheep. Anyone with even a passing knowledge of this season knows how overwhelmingly unpopular these players are.--Firedrake 20:32, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Poorly-written fancruft without context. Andrew pmk | Talk 21:43, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. A heavily condensed version of this information would be useful in the main Big Brother USA article, but it's too long and crappy for me to even suggest merging it outright. Penelope D 21:48, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, nonsense. I know what they're talking about here, but still ... Zoe 22:21, August 28, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, tv show -cruft. Jtkiefer T | @ | C ----- 22:46, August 28, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete Non-notable "alliance".Amren (talk) 23:08, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, not encyclopedic. ral315 17:50, August 29, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete I'm a HUGE fan of the show but alliances are not wiki-worthy. I'm a new user so I'm not sure if I did this right. WhatupDavid 20:22, 31 August 2005 (UTC)
- Delete - Information on alliances is already in show's article. --rob 23:12, 2 September 2005 (UTC)