Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Toby
Appearance
WP:NOT censored. Userfy, fail that Delete (just a note that I am somewhat sympathetic, but just don't think this is the way to do it. Maybe a campaign to get more scientific images... but not censorship) Ryan Norton T | @ | C 09:49, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
- Strong keep. Interesting idea, though hard to understand, which is probably why people are calling it censorship. (Hint - it's opt-in.) --SPUI (talk) 14:05, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
- Strong keep - I'm strongly opposed to the proposal, however there's no reason to delete policy proposals. Just because it's a proposal doesn't mean it will become policy if we don't delete it ;) It will soon become what it deserves to be, a failed policy proposal. -- Joolz 14:43, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
- Strong keep - It obviously won't make it into policy, and we will need it as a historical reference the next time someone tries to censor wikipedia. Should be about two weeks after this fails? Oh, and RN, I think our images are pleanty scientific enough, except a few like autofellatio. --Phroziac (talk) 14:56, September 4, 2005 (UTC)
- Strong keep, all proposed policies - including those that fail - should be left for historical purposes. Alphax τεχ 15:08, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
- Keep - this isn't the method we use to oppose policies we don't like. 86.133.214.36 15:37, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
- Keep, despite its tone it seems to be a serious proposal. It doesn't seem to have much support though, and its first test run was considered vandalism and reverted - so marking it as {{rejected}} sounds appropriate. Radiant_>|< 16:04, September 4, 2005 (UTC)
- Speedy keep all failed serious proposals. ~~ N (t/c) 17:02, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
- Keep and NOOB -- this nomination is invalid, a violation of The Wiki Way. — Xiong熊talk* 18:55, 2005 September 4 (UTC)
- No, the nomination is not invalid, and citing some document that you wrote a few does ago does not make it so. -Splash 18:58, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
- Keep, a good object to point the next attemptor to. -Splash 18:58, 4 September 2005 (UTC)