Jump to content

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Toby

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Xiong (talk | contribs) at 19:00, 4 September 2005 ([[Wikipedia:Toby]]: demo doing fine, thank you). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WP:NOT censored. Userfy, fail that Delete (just a note that I am somewhat sympathetic, but just don't think this is the way to do it. Maybe a campaign to get more scientific images... but not censorship) Ryan Norton T | @ | C 09:49, 4 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

  • Strong keep. Interesting idea, though hard to understand, which is probably why people are calling it censorship. (Hint - it's opt-in.) --SPUI (talk) 14:05, 4 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong keep - I'm strongly opposed to the proposal, however there's no reason to delete policy proposals. Just because it's a proposal doesn't mean it will become policy if we don't delete it ;) It will soon become what it deserves to be, a failed policy proposal. -- Joolz 14:43, 4 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong keep - It obviously won't make it into policy, and we will need it as a historical reference the next time someone tries to censor wikipedia. Should be about two weeks after this fails? Oh, and RN, I think our images are pleanty scientific enough, except a few like autofellatio. --Phroziac (talk) 14:56, September 4, 2005 (UTC)
  • Strong keep, all proposed policies - including those that fail - should be left for historical purposes. Alphax τεχ 15:08, 4 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - this isn't the method we use to oppose policies we don't like. 86.133.214.36 15:37, 4 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, despite its tone it seems to be a serious proposal. It doesn't seem to have much support though, and its first test run was considered vandalism and reverted - so marking it as {{rejected}} sounds appropriate. Radiant_>|< 16:04, September 4, 2005 (UTC)
That is a lie. The Simple Toby demo is nothing close to vandalism; nobody has had been foolish enough to so label it; and it is now alive and well, and available for your viewing pleasure. The comment above is FUD. — Xiongtalk* 19:00, 2005 September 4 (UTC)