Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Bmicomp

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< Wikipedia:Requests for adminship

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Ryan Norton (talk | contribs) at 19:57, 13 September 2005 (→[[User:Bmicomp|Bmicomp]]: support). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Bmicomp

Vote here (44/0/0) ending 23:59 17 September (UTC)

Bmicomp (talk · contribs) – Although Bmicomp has only been here since June 30, he has made an astounding 4700+ edit with 600+ to the Wikipedia namespace, 1500+ (quite a lot) to the User Talk name space as he is constantly monitoring Wikipedia for vandals and warns them. The user definetly needs the rollback button as he is always out whacking vandals and it would also benefit the community if he were promoted to an admin. A great editor if I ever saw one. Sasquatch讲看 23:59, September 10, 2005 (UTC)

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:

I graciously accept the nomination. -- BMIComp (talk, HOWS MY DRIVING) 03:01, 11 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Support

  1. Support, of course. Sasquatch讲看 23:59, September 10, 2005 (UTC)
  2. Agree Martin 00:10, 11 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support. YES!!! Redwolf24 (talk) 00:18, 11 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  4. This is ridiculous. BMI"HOWS MY DRIVING"Comp is not an admin? Doh. Full support.—encephalonέγκέφαλος  00:39:12, 2005-09-11 (UTC)
  5. Support. A great RC patroller. --Canderson7 00:42, September 11, 2005 (UTC)
  6. Support- would make great admin. Flcelloguy | A note? | Desk 00:58, 11 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  7. He's not? Oh my. Suppppppport. ~~ N (t/c) 01:06, 11 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Support Great vandal fighter. Amren (talk) 02:16, 11 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Ruairidi 02:49, 11 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Support. Jaxl | talk 03:34, 11 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Speeding ticket. Andre (talk) 03:48, September 11, 2005 (UTC)
  12. Hands Down-I have had the pleasure to work with him a lot in the past, and he is not only a devoted vandal fighter, but a great contributor, excellent photographer and an all-around good guy! --Gpyoung talk 04:00, 11 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

  13. Journalist C./ Holla @ me!

  14. Support because... well, because this is Bmicomp we're talking about. -- BDAbramson talk 04:27, 11 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Support, he will find good uses for admin powers. Christopher Parham (talk) 04:29, 2005 September 11 (UTC)
  16. Support. Sooner == better. -Splash 04:51, 11 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Support I thought he already was one! Cliched, I know... Pakaran 05:04, 11 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Support Yep, I support. The Fascist Chicken 05:37, 11 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  19. SupportAnother dedicated vandal-fighter. Give him the rollback button!--Exir KamalabadiFeel free to criticize me 07:45, September 11, 2005 (UTC)
  20. Support. A helpful user. Joyous (talk) 13:19, September 11, 2005 (UTC)
  21. Support, a user who has shown by his actions that he would make a great sysop. Rje 18:48, September 11, 2005 (UTC)
  22. Support, MOO. Jtkiefer T | @ | C ----- 22:14, September 11, 2005 (UTC)
  23. Support Seen this user all over the place. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 00:48, 12 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Support. I didn't think he already was one. But he should be. Nufy8 01:00, 12 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Support. Not like it matters any more, but how can I not vote for such a great guy. -GregAsche (talk) 01:40, September 12, 2005 (UTC)
  26. Support this excellent candidate. Likely to be an excellent admin. Antandrus (talk) 03:34, 12 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Support. Excellent hard worker. Sjakkalle (Check!) 06:18, 12 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Support. I hate to be clichê, but I honestly thought he was one until tonight. Fernando Rizo T/C 07:45, 12 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
    "Hmm, it looks like he was an admin until tonight..."' =) — JIP | Talk 09:22, 12 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Support Stewart Adcock 10:45, 12 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Support. In the rare cases where Bmicomp does something controversial, he'll explain his reasoning and try to work out a compromise--a true sign of a good sysop. Owen× ☎ 14:00, 12 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Support. Friday (talk) 18:35, 12 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Support. Thanks for working so hard to be a great editor; I'm sure you'll work equally hard to be a great admin. Nandesuka 18:54, 12 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Support. With much edits in a very short time that are very varied and of course because of your nature to combat vandalism and the mastering of the Spanish language (that can be useful if you would help in translations), I have no doubts about my vote. -- Svest 18:58, September 12, 2005 (UTC) Wiki me up&#153;
  34. Support. Curious about the choice of username. JFW | T@lk 19:35, 12 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Serport. No Big Deal. --Lord Voldemort (Dark Mark) 21:06, 12 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Support Molotov (talk) 22:35, 12 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Support Sebastian Kessel Talk 22:59, 12 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Support --Chris S. 23:31, 12 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Support Only reason it took me so long was I thought I already had! Hamster Sandwich 02:37, 13 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Support. I guess this is evidence of the IRC (Cabal) effect: if you see the person around in the channel, you are more likely to notice that user's edits in recent changes. As a result, assuming the user is a good user, then you are more likely to trust the user to use admin powers wisely. - Mark 03:58, 13 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  41. --Jusjih 07:23, 13 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Support. Lookin' good there.... too bad this RfA is so close.... -[[User:Mysekurity|Mysekurity]] [[additions | e-mail]] 11:07, 13 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Cool. --JuntungWu 13:23, 13 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Support - Definitely. --Phroziac (talk) 15:04, 13 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Support with the usual cliche... --Alan Au 17:31, 13 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Support in full. Hall Monitor 18:42, 13 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Support I thought you were one. Ryan Norton T | @ | C 19:57, 13 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose

Neutral

Comments

Questions for the candidate
A few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:

1. What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? (Please read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.)
I would continue to RC patrol as well as deal with articles that are CSD, close out AfDs and block vandals (it'd be nice to not have to bother admins with this anymore).
2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
I don't have one article I'm particularly proud of, although I am proud of the RC patrolling I've done. To some it may seem sort of trivial, dealing with vandals all day, but somebody has to do it. Also, I put a bit of work into Chicago and related articles.
3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
I was involved in a tame edit conflict early on. I put the dispute into perspective, and realized that Wikipedia is nothing to get upset about. I was fighting to keep what I saw as a misrepresentation out of the article (using citations, I might add), but I took a step back and realized that a misrepresenation in an article doesn't matter. I mean, I should work to make articles neutral, but it's nothing to get upset over. After all, there are methods to deal with edit disputes and there is no instant necessity to fix an article.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/Bmicomp&oldid=23180090"