Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ugnaughts

Ugnaughts

This article asserts no notability through reliable sources, and is simply a repetition of various plot points from the the Star Wars media articles plot sections, and is therefore totally duplicative and should be deleted. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 23:54, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

See also

merge* with List of Star Wars races (U-Z). Not enough real world for full article, but s/b enough for a valid list entry. Umbralcorax (talk) 01:15, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No reliable and independent sources to establish notability. Totally in-universe. Edison (talk) 02:35, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Wikipedia:Five pillars (notability to a real-world audience, unoriginal research, consistent with a “specialized encyclopedia” concerning verifiable fictional topics with importance in the real world) and What Wikipedia is. --Happy editing! Sincerely, Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles^Tally-ho! 23:22, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge as per Umbralcorax. Edward321 (talk) 00:25, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 23:28, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per several independently-written and independently-published sources, both documentary and fictional, covering this subject, and per my comments in AfDs on other similar articles on Star Wars races. DHowell (talk) 03:58, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per Umbralcorax (and I did meddle and bold Umbralcorax's vote for visual clarity). --Quartermaster (talk) 17:38, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, must've missed that. Umbralcorax (talk) 16:55, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 16:59, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - entirely unreferenced plot summary. Create redirect to appropriate List of... (which is itself problematic) atop redlink. --EEMIV (talk) 18:31, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirectable material, especially of a notable and verifiable subject, need not be deleted as well. --Happy editing! Sincerely, Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles^Tally-ho! 18:57, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ugnaughts are, as far as I know, only a background race in the Star Wars universe (Twi'leks and Gamorreans are, no matter the outcome there, far more significant). Listing name drops in books does not equal real world notability.
Merge to List of Star Wars races (U-Z)#Ugnaught. --Amalthea^Talk 10:38, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Notability doesn't appear to be in question. Ecoleetage (talk) 20:35, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Well, yes it is, as per nom. Can you "demonstrate real-world notability from reliable sources" per WP:FICT (essay) or provide "significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject" per WP:NOTE? I can't. --Amalthea^Talk 20:53, 16 August 2008 (UTC)'[reply]
Keep as notable, unoriginally researched fancruft. Erik the Red 2 (AVE·CAESAR) 23:57, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]