User talk:Anpersonalaccount

.

List of Chinese inventions

Thanks. I was able to get the article up to Featured List Status, and I hope this current edit war will end soon, or else it will be grounds for it to lose its Featured Status on Wikipedia. That would truly be a shame, since I (and other editors) have put so much work into it.--Pericles of Athens^Talk 20:32, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't mind that at all, actually. Cheers.--Pericles of Athens^Talk 18:36, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

3RR block

You have been blocked from editing for a short time in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule at List of Chinese inventions. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

The duration of the block is 24 hours. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 15:42, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry! I did not meant it, please forgive me once! Anpersonalaccount (talk) 15:44, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Next time, be mindful that both the reporter and the reportee of reports on WP:AN/3RR can be blocked. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 15:45, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, but he did't stop, so.. Anpersonalaccount (talk) 15:46, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Given your familiarity with WP:3RR, you should know that your explanation is not a valid reason to circumvent policy. Block reduced to 24 hours since this is your first offense. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 15:48, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I did read Wikipedia:Three-revert rule, but thats two days before Gun Powder Ma undid me! Anpersonalaccount (talk) 16:02, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

this is ㄏㄨㄤㄉㄧ, thank you for the link. also i am not a sockpuppet, this is just my regular ip, and im not abusing it so dont report me.162.83.135.213 (talk) 13:17, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Post Shang vs. Shang and later

Actually you know what? Hardly any items he added below belong to Shang; thus Post-Shang addition makes 100% sense. Lol

Actually, not quite. Consider the entry for dagger-axe, guqin, and a couple others. See?--Pericles of Athens^Talk 06:44, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As written in the article, the oldest known use of the written character for the guqin dates to the Shang. Plus, the simple fact that dagger-axe is up there would at least be one Shang invention, no?--Pericles of Athens^Talk 06:51, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also, you're forgetting chopsticks.--Pericles of Athens^Talk 06:52, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You said:

Sure, but one example ain't gonna change everything and you know that

But this doesn't make sense. By my count, dagger-axe, guqin, and chopsticks make three inventions. Surely Shang deserves to be included.--Pericles of Athens^Talk 06:55, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, yes, 3 notable inventions or "firsts" made during Shang really don't amount to much compared to the flurry of inventions made during the Warring States, Han and Song dynasties.--Pericles of Athens^Talk 07:00, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, I don't mind, but what is wrong with quotes?--Pericles of Athens^Talk 07:07, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fine by me. Look at the chemical warfare passage I just added. Awesome.--Pericles of Athens^Talk 07:22, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Personal attack

Please do not try to discredit other editors as vandals when they do not conform to your views. See Wikipedia:No personal attacks. Thx Gun Powder Ma (talk) 20:35, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]