User talk:Private Butcher

Please click here to leave me a new message.

Re:Feces

Vandal has been blocked. Linuxbeak | Talk | Desk 12:44, August 26, 2005 (UTC)

Check Wikipedia:Dealing_with_vandalism and Wikipedia:Vandalism in progress how to deal with vandalisms. You will see also the std messages for user talk pages, Stop you sick bastard, stop vandalising is not so correct ;-). Cate 12:54, 26 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:FascistChicken.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:FascistChicken.gif. I notice it currently doesn't have an image copyright tag, so its copyright status is therefore unclear. Please add a tag to let us know its copyright status. (If you created/took the picture then you can use {{gfdl}} to release it under the GFDL. If you can claim fair use use {{fairuse}}.) If you don't know what any of this means, just let me know on the [[Image::FascistChicken.gif|image description page]] where you got the images and I'll tag them for you. Otherwise, see Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. Thanks so much. And also Image:Betterfc.gif --feydey 19:03, 27 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Re: vandalism

For being somewhat cool I will honestly repress the occasional urge to have "fun" with articles for some period of time. Rock on, Fascist Chicken. 141.156.219.223 05:51, 11 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Bmicomp's RfA

Well, my RfA has not quite completed yet, but either way, I'd like to thank you for your vote and your support, regardless of the outcome. -- BMIComp (talk, HOWS MY DRIVING) 18:40, 12 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Android79's RfA

Thank you for your support on my RfA and for your kind comments. android79 15:32, 13 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

RE: "I might support you on your RfA, so I'm allowed to ask a question"

You ask deep questions, and I answered you on my page, but here's a copy below. Thanks for thinking and looking for real answers.--GordonWatts 02:51, 15 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

You might of said why on your userpage, but I'm just wondering why you cared about what happened to Terri Schiavo? She's just a person, so what if what happened to her, happened to her. Her family should of let her go, she was pretty much gone. If this happened to my loved one I'd let her go, because she shouldn't have to suffer after what has happened to her. And you protested or I believe that's what you said, you have no right to protest to save someone you don't know, or actually care about. You think from "hearing her story" that you know it all and then you can care? It's not mean but actually I might not support your RfA if you give me some answer composed completely of bull shi'ite. The Fascist Chicken 19:59, 14 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

"I might support you on your RfA, so I'm allowed to ask a question" -You can ask a question no matter what, but your fair open-mindedness is more reason for me to try to answer your concerns. " You might of said why on your userpage, but I'm just wondering why you cared about what happened to Terri Schiavo? She's just a person, so what if what happened to her, happened to her." Many people see her as an example or precedent: "Will they do that to me if I am unable to speak?" You see, maybe she was PVA and braid-dead and such, but a quick visit to places like http://gordonwatts.com/ConversationWithTerri.wmv or http://hometown.aol.com/GordonWWatts/myhomepage/ConversationWithTerri.wmv (an over-worked mirror site) show her moving around and looking around and such. My point? Many people like Kate Adamson and Rus Cooper-Dowda were labeled "PVS" and treated to a "no food -no water" diet for like a week or more, and came out of it mad as hell. We often wonder if they will do it to us? Please note that while I am not as "experienced" as some editors, the guidelines say that any editor in good standing should be able to have the "admin" tools, and I think this is because admin tools don't give you much more "power" or anything: I am involved in many controversial pages (Jesus, Christianity, Terri Schiavo, Abortion, etc.) and NEVER have gotten blocked, etc. I'm not perfect, but I've shown I'm trusted in editor things, so I made these points in my recent updated to my RfA page. "Her family should of let her go, she was pretty much gone." Well, I agree that a feeding tube for these people like Terri would sometimes be "invasive" and they should just let her be -but, they didn't merely deny her a feeding tube -they also denied her regular food and water, which at least one nurse said she had eaten like Jello-O and light foods before. My point? It is a felony to deprive handicapped and elderly of food and water here in Florida, so I see your point on letting her be (I don't like feeding tubes -except as temporary measures like a cast for a broken arm) --but when the judge wouldn't even let them see if she could eat and drink light foods, it showed me the reigning government had acquiesced to the husband's request to avoid the handicapped care like hand-feeding. Now, I see that any person who can't feed themselves might be better off dead, but if that is so, we should have just up and kill Christopher Reeves (Superman actor) and should kill Dr. Stephen Hawking, the famous astrophysicist that uses a wheelchair and can't move anything but one hand to use a computer voice. One point? Even if I disagree with you on the way they treat crippled people, that is not a requirement of admins, but I trust you might agree anyhow on why people tried to help Terri. I do admit that when it comes time to die, we all go, and it would be hard to treat her if they had let us try. "You think from "hearing her story" that you know it all and then you can care?" Let me ask you this question: Suppose you see a crippled dog, and someone tells you that it can't eat (but someone else tells you it can and has eaten simple foods -say, it can't chew well) -now, would you be OK with them just slowly, painfully starving the dog to death? Maybe it really is unable to eat, but what if they refuse to even try? Also, maybe the dog can't feel pain. You don't know the dog --you've never met the dog --but you still speak up if they torture a dog with starvation (slow & painful) that may possibly be able to eat and drink and maybe, just maybe feel pain --OK? But how do we know? We really don't. I say, maybe she is brain-dead and those times she looked around were merely "reaction," but we don’t know. I say try to feed them, and if they live, then they live. If they die, they die, but the cowards didn't even try. Now, again, you can vote any way you want, but a person's political and religious views are not a qualification for Admin. Does the person try to work with others who disagree with him. Has he been blocked, banned, etc.? It looks like my old screen name http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log/block&page=User:GordonWattsDotCom was blocked permanently because Uncle Ed convinced me "GordonWattsDotCom" was too self-promoting, but this was voluntary; I was not blocked for doing something wrong; I ASKED for this old screen name to be blocked. Now, my new screen name GordonWatts, see: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log/block&page=User:GordonWatts has NEVER been blocked, and besides the name change, my old one was never blocked; I'm not perfect, but I know wiki things and am respectful, so, by the standard that Jimbo set down (see my Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/GordonWatts points at the top here), I am more than qualified; an admin is just an editor with a few tools. It's not like I can fire people or shut the site down, lol. Anyhow... Thx for your concern. I hope I've answered your questions. Did I do well on that RfA in answering others' questions? Was I respectful?--GordonWatts 02:38, 15 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism.

Please do not vandalize Talk:Nintendo Revolution, thank you. - A Link to the Past (talk) 21:57, 16 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Continued vandalism.

I suggest you stop. If you do not, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - A Link to the Past (talk) 22:44, 16 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Using a Talk page as a gaming forum, and trolling it as well. - A Link to the Past (talk) 23:27, 16 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

So your parents did it seven years before mine, congratulations. However, seven years of existence before I was conceived has not taught you to listen. Yes, you were expressing your opinion, on a talk page that is not made for debating about the quality, or lack thereof, regarding the subject of the article. You reverted it, ignoring this fact, and doing so is vandalism. I do not care how good of an editor you are, no matter how good you are, it does not put you above vandalism. The first message was a warning to not make such comments on talk pages, and the second warning was in response to you putting it back up. - A Link to the Past (talk) 23:55, 16 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

no problem

It's just that the talk pages are meant to be used by editors to discuss on topics regarding the editing of the page. It's not meant to be a discussion forum on the topic. Anyway, just don't do it again. cheers, Jacoplane 22:55, 16 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Fascism Project

Hi, I'm currently assembling Wikipedia:WikiProject Fascism and your input might be interesting, especially if you're versed with fascist political theory. - Stlemur 02:10, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Re your message here -Thx & my reply

Re your message here -Thx & my reply here:

"In fact if you want to since I did this to you, you can question me on anything, if you feel like it," Thx, and I will, if I get curious, but you already stated your views on Terri Schiavo; Well, OK: One question: What would be the right thing to do in my situation -not many votes and some angry campers -but a problem that i feel I must address? (I mean, yes, I want additional powers that an admin gets, since I feel I have well earned this according to the standards set down, but this affects other people.) Since I think that it's wrong for other editors to raise the standard when this is not actual policy, I think this will tick off new users and run them off; For example, some have suggested that since I didn't know the "unwritten rules," then maybe I needed more time to prove myself --I think that if the "unwritten rules" are different than the "actual policy rules," then maybe the "unwritten rules" are bunk and need to be tossed; So, I am saying that I am standing on principle to help other people feel welcome and not abused, like many do. In my letter to Jimbo, I do not simply say: "Install me as admin; I'm right." (Some have big time misquoted me here; Can't they read, lol?) Contra, I told him that I think that either the rules should be followed, or the rules changed, to raise the standard: You see, admin-ship used to simply be giving a good employee a few extra tools, like a flashlight, cell phone, and map, if he/she is going on a trip; Nowadays, however, it is an inside clique, and while many "no" votes were polite and well-meaning, the overall effect is that it's a political football, and insider's clique -the "in-crowd" thing, and I don't like it. Then, people following the crowd, and oftentimes unwilling to admit when they've made a mistake, complicates that already tangled web we weave. Well, initially, I just wanted a few extra tools, but now, seeing the abuse, I want to make it right for other people to be treated according to the rules, not just any way with a little crowd controlling the gateway based upon their feelings. So, how should I proceed? I have been given permission to try again, and I think it might help change things. What do you think? I'm losing the votes, but I think that a major problem has developed -that "inside crowd" clique thing, and want to stop the abuse that causes so many ill will RfA's due to people setting a higher standard than the rules actually say; Thank you, Quentin "Fascist Chicken" Pierce, in advance. "...since I may of angered you in some way by asking about what you believe in. The Fascist Chicken 18:25, 15 September 2005 (UTC)" No problemo; you didn't anger me; I don't have 20-forevers to be online, as this is a NOT paying job, but I don't mind a question, from anyone anyplace anytime (even strange enemies and such), and hope I can clarify if possible.--GordonWatts 02:22, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Your test

Hello, I'm [[User:{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}|{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}]]. An edit that you recently made seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on [[User talk:{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}|my talk page]]. Thanks! Fire Star 03:15, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Your test part 2

I'm sorry, I see that you are a registered editor, and I was very surprised to see one of our accounts post such a new article. Also, it has since been recreated from an anon IP, and deleted again. The applicable policies I see for this article's future survival are cite your sources and no original research. Regards, --Fire Star 03:23, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]