Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Son of Dork

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was no consensus to delete, but I will follow the suggestions of those who wanted this merged with Son Of Dork. I will see what is worth merging, and leave the history in tact so that people can check if I'm doing the merge correctly. Sjakkalle (Check!) 11:41, 26 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Son of Dork

fails music notability, yet to release first albulm Jkelly 19:02, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

weak delete this is a terrible article that reads like an ad. If they are really on Mercury Records, though, it would seem to pass WP:MUSIC, so we may be seeing them again soon. — brighterorange (talk) 19:21, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. allmusic has never heard of them, and I don't think WP:MUSIC would pass them yet. If they really make a record on a major label, I suspect we'll hear about them again. Friday (talk) 21:10, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into Son Of Dork, which is a more professional version. The band is notable because it includes a member of Busted, formerly a very big music group in the U.K., and is signed to a major label. --Sanguinus 19:30, 21 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Merge as above comment. ··gracefool |☺ 17:38, 25 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.