User talk:Renamed user e8LqRIqjJf2zlGDYPSu1aXoc

This is Renamed user e8LqRIqjJf2zlGDYPSu1aXoc's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22: 10 days

Wikipedia vandalism information
(abuse log)

Moderate to high level of vandalism

[view • purge • update]

4.48 RPM according to EnterpriseyBot 14:10, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
21, 22

This page has archives. Sections older than 10 days may be automatically archived by when more than 1 section is present.

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeff Eden

I see at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeff Eden that you sorted this into Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Bands and musicians. It seems to me that this should have gotten sorted into Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Chicago as well. Then we might have saved it. Not much has gotten sorted into our project. Do you know why?--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 04:29, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, frankly I still don't consider the subject to be notable. But in any case, it might simply be that not many obviously Chicago-related articles are getting nommed for deletion; Jeff Eden wasn't obviously Chicago-related, apart from an unexplained tagging as being part of WP Chicago. —/Mendaliv/^2¢/_Δ's/ 05:35, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Christian Abbiati

I don't know how to add a footnote reference/link and it is not clear where I look to find such information. The article where Christian Abbiati says he is a fascist is this http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/sep/27/italy.acmilan Could you add the proper footnote reference then please? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.118.18.24 (talk) 10:16, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sure thing; I've fixed it up. I've also left a welcome message at your talk page with some helpful tips. —/Mendaliv/^2¢/_Δ's/ 10:53, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My RfA

Thank you for supporting me in my RfA, which passed with a count of (154/3/2). I appreciate the community's trust in me, and I will do my best to be sure it won't regret handing me the mop. I am honored by your trust and your support. Again, thank you. –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 19:22, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Thanks!

No problem. I'm sure you would do the same :D DARTH PANDA^talk 00:59, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WTF

Are you a fucking moron dude? Citing sources? The article itself says that it's a theory, all I said was that there are many theories as to what they actually relate to, that information is highly flawed.

Okay, so can you provide a source to state that? Or is that statement entirely original research on your part? —/Mendaliv/^2¢/_Δ's/ 01:04, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

LMAO, the source lies in this"

Andrew H. Gordon and Calvin W. Schwabe speculated that the Ankh, Djed and Was symbols were derived from"

IT SAYS THEY SPECULATED, I shouldn't have to go find a book with some author telling you that NOBODY FUCKING KNOWS WHAT THEY MEAN! AND YOU SHOULDN'T MISLEAD PEOPLE ON WIKIPEDIA BY TELLING what one theory is, and not ANY other single theory.

I'm sorry, that doesn't really follow. I've posted a welcome template on your user talk page, which contains many helpful links which can explain Wikipedia policies and guidelines. I hope this helps! —/Mendaliv/^2¢/_Δ's/ 01:15, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

How does it, "not follow". Are you ok, as in, IQ over 105? When someone says that they speculate, it means that they do not know. Many have speculated, wikipedia lists simply their speculation and it irritates me as a student of Carl P. Ruck's. I feel that it is only appropriate if wikipedia either didn't speculate at all, or told people that it is one theory out of many.

I'm sorry, but as you continue to resort to personal attacks, I cannot continue to help you. Good day. —/Mendaliv/^2¢/_Δ's/ 01:21, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism... Again

Hi there Mendaliv, I was recently on the page where it tells Wikipedian admins. who has recently been vandalizing wikipedia. This IP 71.205.141.55 that you gave repeated warnings to has vandalized flight song once more. I am not yet on the counter-vandalism unit yet, nor a Wikipedian Admin. like you, but I want to catch these vandals. If you could please block him for vandalizing again that would be great. PLEASE feel free to contact me at anytime or look at my WikiStatus at the bottom of my Userpage. Thank you for your help, and I appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia. entertainU (talk) 01:12, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I'm not an admin, but I had reported him to WP:AIV, and an admin has blocked the IP for 31 hours. Good luck! —/Mendaliv/^2¢/_Δ's/

Thanks anyways! Happy Editing! entertainU (talk) 01:19, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Abaddon change

You wrote on my user page:

Welcome to Wikipedia. One or more of the external links you added in this edit to Abaddon do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. You may wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. —/Mendaliv/2¢/Δ's/ 01:23, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

This comment makes no sense. I did not add an external link, I removed one, which you have now put back. I really don't understand why the Wikipedia page on the biblical figure/place Abaddon should have a link to a page about a video game monster which happens to share the name. Did you perhaps mistakenly think I had added the link I removed? In that case, you should probably remove it again. 75.22.28.159 (talk) 01:29, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ah crap, I'm very sorry about that! You're exactly right; I looked too quickly and thought you'd added that link. I've fixed the problem. You can feel free to remove that warning. Thanks for telling me! —/Mendaliv/^2¢/_Δ's/ 01:32, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gruntz

Why did you add a cleanup tag? Why didn't you just revert the gamecruft? TheBlazikenMaster (talk) 02:52, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't consider it necessarily vandalism; i.e., I figured it was good faith and that some stuff could be salvaged from it. Thus I slapped a cleanup on it. —/Mendaliv/^2¢/_Δ's/ 02:54, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I don't consider it a vandalism either, trust me. I would make a good faith summary. TheBlazikenMaster (talk) 02:59, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My user page

Thanks for reverting vandalism on my user page!! LeaveSleaves (talk) 03:06, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

on my link to Aeschylus' Oresteia

Hi, Mendalive. I've just got this upsetting message from you:

"Please do not add inappropriate external links, as you did with this edit to Aeschylus. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. —/Mendaliv/2¢/Δ's/ 01:37, 28 September 2008 (UTC)"

The link that I have added on that "external links" section, was to my translations of the Oresteia plays by Aeschylus. There is no "Translations" section under which I could do this, as is with all other Ancient Greek plays discussed in the wikipedia - and I don't know how to perform that exercise. I think perhaps you could try and add that section yourself and then you could also add a link to my URL.

If, however, all this is too irregular and too offensive to the protocol of editing that page then, by all means, delete my entry. But I can assure you, I have never intended to vandalise Wikipedia -rather, to help readers by providing them with a URL where they can see those plays and other works in an excellent English translation. I'd appreciate it very much if you could communicate with me at:

jacker00@y7mail.com

Many thanks, George Theodoridis —Preceding unsigned comment added by Solowords (talk • contribs) 05:20, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hm, I'm sorry if the level of warning concerned you. The reason I gave that strong a warning was due to the presence of two much-less severe warnings on User talk:58.175.81.202, which I'm assuming you were editing from at that time. The problem, you see, is those edits appeared to simply promote a website, and from the sound of things it's your website. While it appears that my edit was in error, it's a bit concerning that other editors had agreed with similar edits. In looking now, I don't consider your contributions to be counterproductive, but I think they look questionable. Much like a man reaching into the breast pocket of his trench coat- is he going for a business card or a revolver? My suggestion would be perhaps to reword the external link to something like "English translations of several of Aeschylus' works" and have them point directly to the works in question. —/Mendaliv/^2¢/_Δ's/ 08:47, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for reverting the vandalism to my page. --Nlu (talk) 15:50, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]