User talk:24ip/HERE'S YOUR COMMUNITY FEEDBACK

Child Grooming

You've made several major edits to this article without leaving comments on the discussion page. Your edits on this article appear to be seriously POV. Please make an entry on the discussion page when making edits. Your last edit doubled the article in size and removed an NPOV tag yet you marked it as a 'minor' edit. --Lepeu1999 20:33, 14 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

my edit was a revert, not a contribution. 24ip | lolol 19:21, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough, but my comment still stands. The edit you reverted had half a page of discussion devoted to it, don't revert w/o at least adding to the discussion. Also, thank you for the other recent edit to that article. You cleaned up the grammer nicely.--Lepeu1999 18:16, 19 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

User name

... The Uninvited Co., Inc. 20:45, 9 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I am not 'Craig Hubley' as aforementioned. I do not feel changing my name is requisite. I will make it clear on my userpage to prevent confusion. 24 at 23:00, 29 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

If you or Mr. Hubley wishes to pursue legal action against User:UninvitedCompany, User:Raul654, User:Essjay or User:Howabout1 for deliberately propagating malicious lies about you both, or against Wikimedia for granting User:Essjay administrator status so that he could protect the page containing those lies, you would be well justified. If Wikimedia were to ban these libellers for life, it might be relieved in the suit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.177.82.200 (talk • contribs) 15:55, 31 August 2005 -- this template left by User:Jnc (UTC)

The comment left by UninvitedCompany did not assert that I am Craig Hubley, they just took the position that I might be (which is somewhat annoying since I've already said that I am not repeatedly). Since he has not asserted any false claims about me, it can not be considered libellous towards me. 24 at 17:15, 1 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Making legal threats is a fine way to get yourself banned. Rob Church ^{Talk | Desk} 16:11, 10 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

What legal threats? 24ip | lolol 17:40, 10 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I was referring to the unsigned comment above your response. Didn't make that clear enough. Rob Church ^{Talk | Desk} 17:57, 10 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection

This page has been unprotected. If the revert war resumes, I will reprotect. -- Essjay · Talk 03:35, August 22, 2005 (UTC)

Anti-Female Pejorations?

Listen, I have read that my country the United States is accused of being a female-supremacist country. The feminist movement has been accused of promoting female supremacy. I do not condone anti-male discrimination. Feminism has become an anti-male, anti-familial, and antiheterosexual doctrine. I am also a cultural critic. The culture has been accused of conditioning males to feel bad about being male and using sexuality to sell everything. Contrary to the feminist claim, the male sex is clearly the disadvantage sex, and there are also natural gender differences. When I was in school, I suffered a disciplinary action in connection to a relationship with my female classmate. I was told not to mention her name or have any contact with her or come near her, thus accusing me to be obsessed with her. My male classmates said it was okay to call them on the telephone. My female classmates objected to me calling them the telephone, saying "Don't call me anymore." I subsequently gave in to temptation of revenge in response to disciplinary action. I overreacted toward the disciplinary action and started to defame and make fun of every one of my female schoolmates and their parents. I kept saying that I hate females. In my first semester in college, I was the only male student in one class, so I isolated myself from the girls and felt like a lone wolf. Recently, when I was in a work training center, my female co-workers were usually bad to me, while my male co-workers were always good to me. Also, everytime I pursue a romantic relationship with a woman, that woman always unilaterally turns me down. That is why there are many anti-female pejorations on my user page. I seem to like vilifying the female sex, because I saw too much vilification of the male sex. I believe that son preference in Asian countries like China and India is good news to me. The conservative fundamentalist sects view men as tools of sin. I even like for baby girls to be killed or aborted. If I were to become a father, I sure to do not want a daughter. Tedius Zanarukando 04:38, 13 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

um, okay, your experience with the female sex is unfortunate, but you can't judge a huge group of different people based on the actions of some. some males are jerks, some females are jerks; neither should be hated as a whole for the jerks.

feminism -- or at least my definition of it -- is not inherently anti-male because it is the belief of total equality of the sexes. some politically correct radical folks take it too far, like trying to force people to stop saying "spokesman" (if they want me to say "spokesperson" then I want them to say "personism" :|), but alot of feminism (or at least what was done in the past) is done with good cause and reason. modern feminism is mostly a bunch of stupid, whiny complaints, but meh.. if you don't like that I would go the way of anti-"feminism," rather than anti-female. Saying baby girls should be killed is going too far. Killed for the "crimes" of their mothers? Can you gave me a some rationale for why girls/women should be discriminated against? In my opinion, males and females should be equel, and individuals should be the ones judged (based on their actions, not the actions of someone they don't even know).

not that I'm saying you're not allowed to hold a bias; I suppose I do, too: I would rather have a daughter than a son. We can all have opinions, but killing baby girls? we shouldn't punish others for our own bias... 24ip | lolol 19:21, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

impacts

even if impact is a verb, which it is not, it would mean "affect." I would say Rita is already affecting the U.S. as a Cat 5. Don't we mean "makes landfall" or "comes ashore"? 69.142.21.24 00:53, 22 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

http://www.answers.com/impact It is a verb.

If you want to change it for a legitimate reason (such as what you said above) then go ahead, though. 24ip | lolol 00:55, 22 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

On that same answers page they note that 95% of their usage panel disapproves of impact as a transitive verb -- though you are right, they do list it as a verb with a caveat. Anyway, someone else changed it to something else ... 69.142.21.24 02:17, 22 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Sealand

I believe I have rolled all your additions into the current version of Sealand. I apologize if one got dropped somewhere. Also, regarding "bureaux", thank you for educating me. -O^O 23:15, 27 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

There is an ongoing discussion about the creation of infoboxes specifically for unrecognised countries, secession movements and micronatons here. Your contribution would be welcome. Please also note that Rivarez is strongly suspected of being a sockpuppet of Wik, aka Gzornenplatz, aka Nopuzzlestranger, a troll who has been hard banned by Jimbo Wales twice. --Gene_poole 02:07, 29 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]