Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/European Federation Parasitologists
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Sandstein (talk | contribs) at 20:45, 11 October 2008 (Closing debate, result was keep). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Sandstein 20:45, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- European Federation of Parasitologists (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable organization per WP:ORG. Fails WP:V, no sources could be found Smitty (talk) 07:39, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Originally the page tagged was a redirect. I've corrected the header of this section and tagged the correct page. Stifle (talk) 11:47, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- weak Keep WP:V isn't an issue. [1], [2], [3], [4]. Not sure if anyone can write an article on this or if it meets WP:N/WP:ORG, but WP:V is easy and I tend to favor inclusion of verifiable professional organizations. Hobit (talk) 13:03, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Conditional keep - the author must provide a couple of independent references. Adding 'of' to the findsources above gives better results!
- Weak keep. Google Scholar finds this article about the federation's awards and this one which, according to this snippet, discusses its founding. This sort of academic organisation tends to keep its head down as far as publicly available sources go, but I think there's just about enough here. Phil Bridger (talk) 15:58, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.