Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AM New York
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Uncle G's major work 'bot (talk | contribs) at 18:21, 2 October 2005 (Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/AM New York moved to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AM New York). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep. Joyous 04:23, Jan 16, 2005 (UTC)
Free newspaper, and doesn't seem notable. - Ta bu shi da yu 14:05, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Depends. Free newspapers can be notable. Metro is, but it seems like it doesn't have an article - Jeltz talk 14:54, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- I dunno, printing a daily newspaper, no matter how trashy, does hint at notability. Anybody from new york care to comment? --fvw* 16:15, 2005 Jan 2 (UTC)
- Weak keep for now. —RaD Man (talk) 19:22, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Weak Delete, borderline notability at best. Megan1967 00:35, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. It's run by Newsday. See [www.nynewsday.com/other/special/amny link]. --JuntungWu 02:48, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Keep it. Wyss 03:42, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Strong keep. A daily newspaper in New York City must clear the bar. Samaritan 05:49, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Clear keep. -- Jmabel | Talk 06:08, Jan 3, 2005 (UTC)
- Keep it. Kensho 06:25, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC) I live in NYC and this newspaper is great!. Its very small and has a nice collection of articles. It's like an express version of the NYT or the Post but without the editorials.
- Keep ~ mlk ✉♬ 06:29, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC) ~
- Keep. GRider\talk 18:28, 4 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. The phenomenon of free daily newspapers is expected to grow. The Boston Globe just reached an arrangement with the Boston free paper, so it can use some Globe content and will help promote Globe stories. We should not only keep this article, we should add specific articles on the publications referred to generally in Metro International, including the one in NYC. JamesMLane 09:08, 6 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. Notable. Jayjg | (Talk) 17:29, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. Notable. Salazar 02:59, 10 Jan 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.