Jump to content

Wikipedia:Collaboration of the week/Archive

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by AceYYC (talk | contribs) at 22:11, 2 October 2005 (updated COTW). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Each week, Wikipedians nominate an article to become the collaboration of the week. The aim is to produce featured-standard articles, through widespread cooperative editing. This project aims to fill holes in Wikipedia, so only non-existent articles, or stubs may be nominated.

The next collaboration will be selected at 18:00 on Sunday October 9, UTC (the current time is 00:19, January 6, 2025).

Selection process

The collaborations are selected by approval voting. This is done by clicking the edit button to the right of the article's nomination, and adding the text # ~~~~.

  • Only registered users may vote, and their first edit must have been before the article was nominated.
  • Only support votes and comments should be added, as the articles are chosen by approval voting.

Nominating articles

To nominate an article:

  • At the bottom of the list of nominees on this page enter the text {{Wikipedia:Collaborations of the Week/article name}}, replacing the text "article name" appropriately. Do not use the "edit" link of the last heading.
  • Follow the new red link, and enter the text {{subst:newcotw|article name|~~~~~|date in seven days|your reason for nominating|~~~~}}. changing the text accordingly (for example, add: {{subst:newcotw|Dog hair|~~~~~|[[12 July]]|This is really important for all dog-lovers.|~~~~}}).
  • If the article you are nominating already exists, please add {{COTW}} to the top of its talk page.

Considerations

  • Please only nominate stubs (articles of two short paragraphs or less).
  • Giving good reasons will help others in supporting your nomination.
  • Articles should interest a wide number of people, so many can contribute to the article's improvement.

Nominees

If this page doesn't update properly, either clear your cache or purge the server's cache.

Nominated on 08:11, 19 September 2005 (UTC); needs 6 votes by 3 October, 2005.

Just check out the article for a reason for nomination.

Support:

  1. - Cobra Ky (talk, contribs) 08:11, 19 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  2. --Yodakii 13:58, 21 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  3. RENTASTRAWBERRY FOR LET? röck 23:50, 25 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  4. --Zxcvbnm 21:36, 30 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  5. --Mark J 13:54, 2 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  6. --SoothingR 10:06, 9 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Ливай | 01:36, 12 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  8. HereToHelp (talk) 01:58, 25 October 2005 (UTC) There are a bunch of articles that need it; this is one of them. For sure.[reply]
  9. Tom 18:10, 29 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Shinoko 02:28, 31 October 2005 (UTC) This could get a bit theoretical, but now it's pathetic.[reply]
  11. Dmn Դմն 23:48, 1 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Quadell (talk) (bounties) 14:18, 7 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  13. JwandersTalk 20:06, 13 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Nominated on 01:55, 18 September 2005 (UTC); needs 9 votes by 9 October.

One of the most important events in modern Mexican and North American history, currently a stub with only a paragraph imported from History of Mexico.

Support:

  1. Shauri 01:55, 18 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Darwinek 14:10, 25 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  3. thames 13:47, 26 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  4. -- Rune Welsh ταλκ 10:54, 28 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  5. --Spangineer (háblame) 00:01, 29 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Titoxd 03:53, 1 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Astrokey44 09:53, 4 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Nominated on 22:41, 22 September 2005 (UTC); needs 6 votes by 6 October.

Lydia was a significant and original culture in Asia Minor. The article needs Ethno-linguistic, Culture, Economics (Some believe they were the first to use coins) and History sections.

Support:

  1. Falphin 22:41, 22 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  2. A vital link in the long and complex Ancient history of the Near East Fastifex 06:07, 29 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Lots of work done on this one... -- WB 22:28, 1 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Wapoo 09:42, 10 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Whoa, this lacks. Newbie222 00:32, 11 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  6. --The Anachronism 00:51, 11 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  7. KingTT 13:24, 12 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Gareth Hughes 14:40, 13 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Astrokey44 15:13, 13 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  10. thames 16:17, 19 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Felix Dance 16:14, 23 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Nominated on 20:22, 25 September 2005 (UTC); needs 6 votes by October 9, 2005.

This is a fundamental and basic section of a CPU. I am shocked to see this article as short as it is. This should be developed. There are many resources online and in libraries about it.

Support:

  1. ZeWrestler Talk 20:22, 25 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Denis Kasak 16:31, 26 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  3. x1987x 21:54, 26 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Dan M 00:25, 28 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  5. AnyFile 20:25, 14 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  6. nihon 00:57, 22 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Nominated on 00:13, 30 September 2005 (UTC); needs 3 votes by October 6.

As such a basic article concept, this definitely needs some improvement. This could easily become a huge article - history of defense, how it's changed, basic concepts of defense, the list is endless.

Support:

  1. ChewyLSB 00:13, 30 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Batmanand 17:11, 15 October 2005 (UTC) Shamefully short.[reply]

Nominated 09:02, 6 November 2005 (UTC); needs 12 votes by 11 December

I was nominating this because it's the site's most wanted stub, with 7808 pages linking to it as of Oct 29, and I noticed it had been previously nominated. -- Beland 09:02, 6 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Support:

  1. Beland 09:02, 6 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  2. JwandersTalk 20:05, 13 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Quadell (talk) (bounties) 14:24, 7 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Rmrfstar 06:55, 21 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  5. - Sites most wanted stub? definitely - Hahnchen 13:42, 22 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Tothebarricades 07:39, 24 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  7. CrossTimer 12:39, 28 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  8. of course Yellowmellow45 13:15, 30 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Pyro19 20:53, 30 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Gflores Talk 21:20, 2 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Davodd 00:58, 3 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Soul assassin 11:28, 3 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  13. RJH 23:24, 4 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Nominated on 20:56, 30 September 2005 (UTC); needs 3 votes by 7 October.

France is the most promiant example of Absolutism in the 17th and 18th centuries. Someone has finally given it its own (if not very wikified) article. 130.160.86.143 20:56, 30 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Support:


--mitrebox 21:54, 3 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Nominated on 11:15, 2 October 2005 (UTC); needs 3 votes by 9 October.

The centerpiece of main street culture in any developed part of the world. Sorry stub.

Support:

  1. lots of issues | leave me a message 11:15, 2 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Carabinieri 21:34, 14 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Nominated on 12:20, 2 October 2005 (UTC); needs 3 votes by October 9.

This subject is very good for expanding and now it is very small. I won't expand it because of my poor English. I think this article need to be expanded becaues it can be said much more about it than it is now.

Support:

  1. Hołek ҉ 12:20, 2 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]