Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Legendary Frog
Appearance
I found this article by following a link on Talk:Joseph Blanchette. The link admits to cheating, and that article was deleted in this AfD. Whilst I have no opinion, I think this article should also been seen by AfD. Note that it is not speediable as a recreation, really, since it is a rewrite (just). -Splashtalk 16:59, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
- Keep and rename to Joseph Blanchette. It seems to me the article on Joseph Blanchette was deleted in error, the subject is clearly notable enough. --Mysidia (talk) 18:17, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
- keep rewrite After reading the article and talk, I agree. — brighterorange (talk) 19:09, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
- Keep
- Keep for reasons given on the talk pages of both articles, as well as my objections to the original VfD on the other article. And the "cheating" line was probably a joke, man. (As for the naming aspect, people are just as likely to search for Legendary Frog as Joseph Blanchette; he puts both names on every movie he does. Whatever happens, one should redirect to the other.) CaptHayfever 03:43, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. .:.Jareth.:. babelfish 18:38, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
- Keep (disclosure: I created this page). I'm not sure I can say much more than what I've already said elsewhere. If we are to have any articles on flash animated artists/series at all (and we certainly do), then Legendary Frog is more than notable enough for inclusion. (I have a much bigger defence for keeping this article, in the article's talk page - please go there.) In any case, whatever the outcome of this vfd, I'll be relieved to see this issue finally seeing some formal resolution. Wandering oojah 15:02, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
- Oh, as for my comment about 'cheating', yes, I was mostly joking. It's true I created this article in a, ah, fairly sneaky manner...but I was also under the impression that rewriting deleted articles, when there is due cause, is generally tolerated on Wikipedia. Wandering oojah 15:02, 4 October 2005 (UTC)