Talk:Bang! Bang! Eche!

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bang! Bang! Eche! article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Notice: This article lacks WP:A to establish WP:MUSIC

In my opinion, this article either lacks sufficient Attribution that it satisfies the Notability criteria for Music, or it may violate the Conflict of interest guideline, or perhaps it is a Copyright violation.

Wikipedia articles must be based on reliable sources to verify any claims of notability. Even though the lack of reliable source attribution in an article is not grounds for deletion in itself, an article with absolutely no sources (or only external links to unreliable ones) suggests to some editors that multiple reliable sources may not, in fact, exist.

Although I am considering tagging this article for deletion according to the Deletion policy, I am nonetheless willing to assist User:Charlie from new zealand (talk · contribs), and other recent contributors to this article, to make constructive improvements to it ... I do not have time to examine this article in depth at the moment, and it may improve over time, in which case this warning was premature.

Please respond on this Discussion page, instead of on my Talk page, in order to avoid fragmenting the conversation. —Triwbe (talk) 06:01, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. And if the topic is found to be notable, the article could use some work. Specifically:

First references to individuals should provide full names
Tone is too conversational, should be encyclopedic
Facts (especially ones that sound like they're based on private information) need to be referenced
Add wikilinks, e.g. to locations.

By the way, I've learned that this page has been speedy deleted three times in the past. It does, however, appear that it now asserts the importance of its subject. Ma^t_chups 7 September 2008

Hi. Am currently in the proccess of editing page to fit guidelines. We are in the middle of a US tour so we have a lot to update :-) Thanks a lot! 24.0.200.127 (talk) 00:25, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I have added three references to the "Achievements" section and reworded it a bit. 24.0.200.127 (talk) 04:41, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]