Jump to content

Talk:Gillett et al., "Attribution of polar warming to human influence", 2008

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by OhanaUnited (talk | contribs) at 02:37, 2 November 2008 (rated). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconEnvironment NA‑class
WikiProject iconThis environment-related redirect is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized.
Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.
NAThis redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Why was this pulled?

I just saw this on the front page yesterday and now it's not there. Can someone tell me why it was removed? I think this is a significant event! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dilcoe (talkcontribs) 16:59, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There's a difference of opinion over the wording. See Wikipedia:In the news section on the Main Page/Candidates#ITN candidates for October 31 -- Gotyear (talk) 20:05, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Changes

I've made some changes [1]. The article appear to be suggesting that people had thought Antartica was unaffected by global warming and that there was no known temperature change before this study. Actually, all the references I've looked at to support the claims don't say anything of the sort. They say there was insufficient data to know but that there was various theories suggesting it was or would happen and that temperature had been rising but that it couldn't be conslusively linked to human activity. Nil Einne (talk) 15:18, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]