Jump to content

Template talk:Did you know

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Bruce1ee (talk | contribs) at 07:42, 2 November 2008 (Articles created/expanded on October 29: tweaked Spectacle Reef Light). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

"Neuron screen" at the Edmond and Lily Safra Center for Brain Sciences
"Neuron screen" at the Edmond and Lily Safra Center for Brain Sciences

This page is for nominations to appear in the "Did you know" section (reproduced on the right) on the Main Page.

Did you know?
Introduction and rules
IntroductionWP:DYK
General discussionWT:DYK
GuidelinesWP:DYKCRIT
Reviewer instructionsWP:DYKRI
Nominations
Nominate an articleWP:DYKCNN
Awaiting approvalWP:DYKN
ApprovedWP:DYKNA
April 1 hooksWP:DYKAPRIL
Holding areaWP:SOHA
Preparation
Preps and queuesT:DYK/Q
Prepper instructionsWP:DYKPBI
Admin instructionsWP:DYKAI
Main Page errorsWP:ERRORS
History
StatisticsWP:DYKSTATS
Archived setsWP:DYKA
Just for fun
Monthly wrapsWP:DYKW
AwardsWP:DYKAWARDS
UserboxesWP:DYKUBX
Hall of FameWP:DYK/HoF
List of users ...
... by nominationsWP:DYKNC
... by promotionsWP:DYKPC
Administrative
Scripts and botsWP:DYKSB
On the Main Page
Main Page errorsWP:ERRORS
To ping the DYK admins{{DYK admins}}

Instructions

List new suggestions here, under the date the article was created or the expansion began (not the date you submit it here), with the newest dates at the top. If a suitable image is available, place it immediately before the suggestion. Any user may nominate a DYK suggestion; self-nominations are permitted and encouraged.

Remember:

  • Proposed articles should:
    • not be marked as stubs;
    • contain more than 1,500 characters (around 1.5 kilobytes) in main body text (ignoring infoboxes, categories, references, lists, and tables). This is a mandatory minimum; in practice, articles longer than 1,500 characters may still be rejected as too short, at the discretion of the selecting administrators.
    • cite their sources (these sources should be properly labelled; that is, not under an "External links" header); and
    • be no more than five days old (former redirects, stubs, or other short articles whose main body text has been expanded fivefold or more within the last five days are acceptable).
  • Articles on living individuals must be carefully checked to ensure that no unsourced or poorly sourced negative material is included. Articles and hooks which focus unduly on negative aspects of living individuals should be avoided.
  • Articles with good references and citations are preferred.
  • To count the number of characters in a piece of text, you will need to use a JavaScript extension like User:Dr pda/prosesize.js (instructions on the talk page), a free website like this, or an external software program that has a character-counting feature. For example, if you are using Microsoft Word, select the text from the article page (or, in the case of "Did you know" nominations, this Talk page) – not the edit page containing Wikitext – then copy and paste it into a blank document. Click "Tools" ("Review" in Office 2007), then "Word Count", and note the "Characters (with spaces)" figure. Other word processing programs may have a similar feature. For Mac users, Apple has a Word counter widget available for Mac OS X 10.4 or later. Note: The character counts indicated on "Revision history" pages are not accurate for DYK purposes as they include categories, infoboxes and similar text in articles, and comments and signatures in hooks on this page.
  • Suggested facts (the 'hook') should be:
    • interesting to draw in a variety of readers,
    • short and concise (fewer than about 200 characters, including spaces),
    • neutral,
    • definite facts that are mentioned in the article, and
    • always cited in the article with an inline citation.
Please note that hooks are subject without notice to copyediting as they move to the main page. The nature of the DYK process makes it impractical to consult users over every such edit. In particular, hooks will be shortened if they are deemed too long: the 200-character limit is an outside limit not a recommended length. Also, watch the suggestions page to ensure that no issues have been raised about your hook, because if you do not respond to issues raised your hook may not be featured at all.
  • Suggested pictures should be:
    • suitably and freely (PD, GFDL, CC etc) licensed (NOT fair use) because the main page can only have freely licensed pictures;
    • attractive and interesting, even at a very small (100px-wide) resolution;
    • already in the article; and
    • relevant to the article.
    • formatted as [[Image:image name |right|100x100px| Description]] and placed directly above the suggested fact.
  • Suggested sounds should have similar qualities to pictures, and should be formatted using the format {{DYK Listen|filename.ogg|Brief description}}
  • Proposed lists should have two characteristics to be considered for DYK: (i) be a compilation of entries that are unlikely to have ever been compiled anywhere else (e.g. List of architectural vaults), and (ii) have 1,500+ character non-stub text that brings out interesting, relational, and referenced facts from the compiled list that may not otherwise be obvious but for the compilation.
  • Please sign the nomination, giving due credit to other editors if relevant. For example:
    • *... that (text)? -- new article by [[User]]; Nom by ~~~~
    • *... that (text)? -- new article self-nom by ~~~~
    • *... that (text)? -- new article by [[User]] and ~~~~
    • *... that (text)? -- Article expanded fivefold by [[User]]; Nom by ~~~~
    • *... that (text)? -- Article expanded fivefold and self-nom by ~~~~
    • *... that (text)? -- Article expanded fivefold by [[User]] and ~~~~
  • When saving your suggestion, please add the name of the suggested article to your edit summary.
  • Please check back for comments on your nomination. Responding to reasonable objections will help ensure that your article is listed.
  • If you nominate someone else's article, you can use {{subst:DYKNom}} to notify them. Usage: {{subst:DYKNom|Article name|November 5}} Thanks, ~~~~
  • For more details see the previously Unwritten Rules.

Symbols

  • If you want to confirm that an article is ready to be placed on a later update, or that there is an issue with the article or hook, you may use the following symbols (optional) to point the issues out:
Symbol Code Ready for DYK? Description
{{subst:DYKtick}} Yes No problems, ready for DYK
{{subst:DYKtickAGF}} Yes Article is ready for DYK, with a foreign-language or offline hook reference accepted in good faith
{{subst:DYK?}} Query An issue needs to be clarified before the article's eligibility can be determined
{{subst:DYK?no}} Maybe Article is currently ineligible but may only need some minor work to fix
{{subst:DYKno}} No Article is either completely ineligible, or else requires considerable work before becoming eligible

Next update


Backlogged?

This page often seems to be backlogged. If the DYK template has not been updated for substantially more than 6 hours, it may be useful to attract the attention of one of the administrators who regularly updates the template. See the page Wikipedia:Did you know/Admins for a list of administrators who have volunteered to help with this project.

Candidate entries

Articles created/expanded on November 2

Articles created/expanded on November 1

typo for "patriarchal"; changed. Johnbod (talk) 01:49, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on October 31

I've commented out the pic because it's not showing as a 100x100 thumbnail, at least not in my browser... Hassocks5489 (tickets please!)
I much prefer "best known" to "most well known" jnestorius(talk) 13:19, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Either way, such a hook is rather WP:PEACOCK/POV-ish. --74.13.129.207 (talk) 14:04, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
There is some overlap here with phasmophobia, which featured on DYK earlier today. Hassocks5489 (tickets please!) 19:49, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
There is no overlap. Laudak (talk) 01:36, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on October 30

I think in this case primary sources might be all right because no original research is involved. "Primary sources are considered reliable for basic statements of fact", in this case the date when the Hershey Company released three flavors of Snack Barz. --Jh12 (talk) 01:49, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This article's hook is unsourced or too long or there are other content issues I think there might be a questionmark over the notability of these products though. Gatoclass (talk) 02:03, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
There are articles on every other Hershey's product, so why not this one? Why wouldn't a specially-named product produced by one of the world's largest chocolate manufacturers be notable? Can I at least have another opinion?Intothewoods29 (talk) 04:06, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Snack Barz may be a more appropriate name for the article since "There are three varieties, Hershey's Snack Barz, Reese's Snack Barz, and S'mores Snack Barz. ".[1] The DYK rules say that articles longer than 1,500 characters may still be rejected as too short, at the discretion of the selecting administrators. Usually, that happens when primary sources are used rather than secondary sources. As for material to expand the article, see Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL and some of [2][3][4][5][6]. -- Suntag 16:16, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Eduard Spelterini
Eduard Spelterini
"balloonist" is surely much the commonest, & to be preferred? Johnbod (talk) 02:13, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Changed to "balloonist", though any other term is also fine with me. Thanks for notifying me, Art!  Sandstein  06:31, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Old postcard from Ceranów, Poland
Old postcard from Ceranów, Poland
I presume Satchel Paige should not be bold jnestorius(talk) 16:22, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I hope Satchel Paige can be expanded 5 times soon. Or it won't qualify--74.13.128.225 (talk) 19:27, 30 October 2008 (UTC) Unbolded. Expansion is unlikely for the already long article. --74.13.129.207 (talk) 14:24, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This conflict is still ongoing. Suggest mentioning "so far" or sth to that effect in the hook. Also suggest checking the news for updates before posting the "57" figure on the main page. Pls also expand the intro. It's rather short. --74.13.129.207 (talk) 14:59, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ōe Taku
Ōe Taku
"in anger"? Is Pearce a person with emotions?.... --74.13.129.207 (talk) 15:06, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This page explains the idiom. Art LaPella (talk) 21:33, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
How interesting! Thank you for the link, Mr. LaPella. I learn sth new today. --74.12.126.164 (talk) 04:38, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
An inspiration for any of this author's books? --74.13.129.207 (talk) 14:24, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Where? Some geographical context, pls. --74.13.129.207 (talk) 14:24, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
context added, phrased claim more carefully --rm (talk) 17:14, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the confirmation...but it is actually is that interesting, I believe, since it is highly uncommon for a Hollywood film to go into release at that excessive length. Ecoleetage (talk) 03:58, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
"... the original running time of the 1965 film The Greatest Story Ever Told was the unusaly long length of four hours and 20 minutes?" perhaps? On a side note though, I am not sure this really qualifies as for DYK as expanded articles should have been expanded from a stub or other very short article and the page was over 5,000 bytes when you started working on it. Icewedge (talk) 06:25, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Lists, templates, refs etc are not counted, so this is a genuine 5x expansion. Johnbod (talk) 02:17, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on October 29

or ... that Jean Robic, winner of the 1947 Tour de France, was so light that at mountain summits he was handed lead and mercury ballasted drinking bottles for faster, gravity assisted, descents? Article rewritten and expanded fivefold by User talk:Les woodland. Nominated by Autodidactyl (talk) 16:02, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Spectacle Reef Light
Spectacle Reef Light
OK, new hook:
  • ... that the Buffalo pebble snail (pictured) is adapted to survive both on rocks in a fast stream and also on sandy bottoms in stagnant water?
alternative:
This fact will work better as a DYK hook if Viswanathan Kakkan is a famous guy with a wikibio (Go turn the redlink blue!), or if the two political parties are high-profile rivals. So many politicians have siblings in the same business, you know. --74.13.129.207 (talk) 15:13, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It isn't a question of siblings being in politics. But it is a rarity for a Dalit politician (that too in Tamil Nadu where the anti-Hindutva sentiments are high amongst Dalits) to contest the elections as a candidate of the NDA. And though I'm not sure if Viswanathan Kakkan, himself, would satisfy notability criteria, it would come as a surprise to many that the brother of a former Minister and prominent Dalit leader is associated with the Sangh Parivar and has contested the elections as a candidate of the NDA.-RavichandarMy coffee shop 03:21, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, Indian National Congress and Janata Party are rivals today. But the rivalry did not exist during the lifetime of P.Kakkan as he died 27 years back. In fact, the Congress party had no serious opponents at that time. But there has not been any high-profile Dalit leader or relative of any high-profile Dalit leader from Tamil Nadu associated with the BJP or its allies. Almost all big names from the Dalit communities in Tamil Nadu as Iyothee Thass, Rettamalai Srinivasan, Thirumavalavan and Krishnasamy had been opponents of the Sangh Parivar and its ideology.-RavichandarMy coffee shop 03:32, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Like the second one. Was there a key feature that scooped heritage? Julia Rossi (talk) 07:51, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Bertie Ahern
Bertie Ahern
After is better, or this will appear to be free advertising. --74.13.129.207 (talk) 14:51, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Need to establish in the hook that this is a notable film, or this sounds like another low-budget film failure. Also need to clarify the currency.
Good point about the notable vs low-budget failure criteria. What do you mean by needing to "clarify the currency"? SWik78 (talkcontribs) 15:45, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
What is a drum hoist motor? --74.13.129.207 (talk) 14:38, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
In the hoist (mining) article it describes the difference between a friction hoist and drum hoist, the introduction explains that they are both powered by electric motor
is this Alt clearer?... that the required horsepower of an electric motor used to operate a friction hoist can be up to 30% less than the electric motor to required to operate a drum hoist for the same application? --Kelapstick (talk) 21:07, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Suggest mentioning in the hook who Cromwell was, at least for the uninitiated. --74.13.129.207 (talk) 14:38, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I wouldn't. The uninitiated might not recognize the Britishisms "barrister" and "QC" either, and at least Cromwell is linked. "Lord Protector" wouldn't help the uninitiated at all, and "17th-century British ruler" is a lot of words for the Main Page. Art LaPella (talk) 21:33, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
How about–
Could the second genuine be left out? Julia Rossi (talk) 12:49, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I deliberately used "genuine" twice, because the first 2 questions paleontologists would ask are "Are they really fossil rabbits?" and "Are they really Precambrian rocks?" -- Philcha (talk) 14:41, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Shouldn't DYK hooks be questions? Where should the question mark be? --74.13.128.225 (talk) 14:36, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for spotting that - fixed now. -- Philcha (talk) 14:41, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This article's hook is unsourced or too long or there are other content issues 251 character hook. Art LaPella (talk) 23:46, 29 October 2008 (UTC)Shortened. Art LaPella (talk) 21:37, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Is "intro" a formal word to be used on Wikipedia's front page? --74.13.129.207 (talk) 14:38, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on October 28

Length, date and reference verified. Olaf Davis | Talk 17:15, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
So he switched job. Is there a more interesting fact for DYK purposes? --74.13.129.207 (talk) 15:22, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
...About Mullins? Probably not. The move from the fed to LTCM was a big deal because he was part of a "Dream Team" coming from Harvard, MIT and Washington to run this new hedge fund. Being on the board of governors of the federal reserve is one of the hardest jobs to get as an economist in the world. It isn't often that people with jobs like that bail early to go to a private company that no one had heard of before 1994 (and didn't exist before 1993). Protonk (talk) 15:50, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Alt hook may be more accessable. I'm indifferent as to which is used. Rlendog (talk) 17:41, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The hook (and the article) should be couched in terms of allegations; there has been no determination of guilt. Kablammo (talk) 12:07, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You're right, of course. --Hunter Kahn (talk) 02:38, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This article's hook is unsourced or too long or there are other content issues - good article but the hook is too long (Max 200 characters). Suggest removing "the 2008 Democratic Party presidential nominee" - information which is established by clicking on Obama's article. --Flewis(talk) 11:03, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I suggest where instead of at which. Kablammo (talk) 01:25, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Done. --TheLeftorium 09:50, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Should that pic be a {{Non-free web screenshot}} and therefore not allowed here in DYK? --76.64.76.218 (talk) 16:58, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It is a screenshot, but from a video I filmed/uploaded under the account name theduhdoodstm. It's not a great image, though, so I don't really expect it to go up on DYK. BobAmnertiopsisChatMe! 17:58, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Two suggestions:

- Relies heavily on a single reference (which appears to be a dead-link). The other reference make no mention of the subject whatsoever. Citations 3 + 4 should be in a separate 'notes' section. --Flewis(talk) 10:58, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Expiring noms

Articles created/expanded on October 27

or ... that Bernard Sainz, who was known as 'Dr Mabuse' because of his dramatic success in horse racing and cycling, was jailed for three years for administering doping products? Article created by User talk:Les woodland, nominated by Autodidactyl (talk) 19:28, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • ... that Hanwei Group is the biggest producer of eggs in China?

ALT

... that Chinese egg producer Hanwei Group has admitted to giving its chickens feed tainted with the chemical melamine? -- new article, self-nom Malick78 (talk) 18:43, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Can't we combine the two? ALT: :... that the largest egg producer in China, the Hanwei Group, has admitted to giving its chickens feed tainted with the chemical melamine? Still only 140 odd. Johnbod (talk) 22:49, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Sure, good idea:) Malick78 (talk) 15:37, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This article's hook is unsourced or too long or there are other content issues Article is tagged as a stub, making it ineligible. Maybe someone can improve it so the stub tag can be removed? Truthanado (talk) 16:14, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I added 'stub' when I started the article but it's since been expanded to over 3,000 bytes so it's no longer applicable. I've therefore removed it. Malick78 (talk) 07:27, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Great! Thanks, CaliforniaAliBaba, for fixing both the article and the DYK hook so quickly. --PFHLai (talk) 13:39, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Everything checks out. Good to go. Truthanado (talk) 16:21, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Duskyshoulder trevally
Duskyshoulder trevally
alt hook :
Don't like the alt hook, since the main clause is about Islywn rather than the new article. Also, it should link to William Thomas (Islwyn) rather than Islwyn. jnestorius(talk) 13:48, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
OK, I've changed the link. The hook is mentioned in the article but I think the alt is probably unnecessary anyway ♦ Jongleur100 talk
How about '*... that Ynysddu was the birthplace of the poet Islwyn, who once wrote a poem over 9,000 lines long? ♦ Jongleur100 talk 18:38, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
File:Portrait Of Madame Riviere.jpg
all ok except hook fact may need rewording - see talk. print ref. Title changed to Louvre version. Pic also changed at article to Commons one, but not here. Johnbod (talk) 03:42, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Clarified facts in the article and on talk. Hook reworded. Ceoil sláinte 20:56, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
"year" may have to be taken loosely, as we don't have months, but I'm ok with that. Johnbod (talk) 22:49, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Looks good! All checked out. BobAmnertiopsisChatMe! 15:26, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The word "special" was a typo. It should read "species". Have corrected accordingly. Thanks! --MChew (talk) 02:38, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Trading what? Computers? Or shares in the stockmarket? Pls clarify in the hook. --74.13.129.207 (talk) 15:27, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Just "of trading" - it doesn't need a follow-on. You could change it to "of existence", if you wanted, although that implies the company were alive, or to "in operation". If you want it rewritten, how about:
Might be a nice one to "save" for November 5th, just in case someone called Barack should be in the news that day? :-) 82.3.242.144 (talk) 20:22, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This article's hook is unsourced or too long or there are other content issues Length and date verified. Offline references accepted in good faith. The hook is too long though. A 200 character limit applies --Flewis(talk) 07:42, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Length, date and ref's verified --Flewis(talk) 07:37, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I think this might be more interesting - Alt Hook - ... that Norwegian industrial company Denofa used whale oil as a basis for refinement? --Flewis(talk) 07:35, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- the article is well written, however all of the inline citations provided do not contain the information listed within the article. The two external online references provided (tv.com + imdb.com) are driven by user-generated content - (see WP:EL for more info) which makes then unreliable as a primary point of information. The single offline ref 1960-1961 American network television schedule is a little vague, and it tells the reader nothing of how to access the information. I suggest finding some extra external Reliable sources to alleviate any WP:OR concerns and to get this article onto the main page. --Flewis(talk) 10:35, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on October 26

Date, length and reference verified. Olaf Davis | Talk 13:15, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Is this a hook for T. M. Nair? Save for later when the redlink Taravath Ammalu Ammal turns blue? --74.13.129.207 (talk) 15:36, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
the alt hook conflates and misleads. He only rode 1907 as a 'boucle de bouffe'. 1905 he raced, 1907 he ate, 1914 he raced and died. (He should have stuck with the MacTour). it would be more accurate to say something like ... Autodidactyl (talk) 00:16, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
that Henri Pépin, who rode the 1907 Tour de France by stopping in good restaurants and sometimes finishing 12 hours behind the leaders, died of athleticism in 1914? ... but it's a bit fussy, I prefer the simplicity of the original. Autodidactyl (talk) 00:19, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Length, date, hook's ref verified. --Rosiestep (talk) 16:50, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I have added a link to Gastrotypographicalassemblage as a second article for DYK consideration. Alansohn (talk) 03:43, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Date & length of second article verified, assuming ref is good in the first.
Length, date, hook's ref verified. --Rosiestep (talk) 16:58, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Doesn't this amount to saying there were no tropical storms in June 2004? Is this interesting? jnestorius(talk) 13:52, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Which of the refs verifies this hook? --Rosiestep (talk) 16:55, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I used another reference, but apparently I lost it. Perhaps I can rewrite it as follows so it's not too misleading. How about:
Then again, I have no idea whether or not I can text 911 or 112. But I think the rewrite is more factual given the current references. --Sky Harbor (talk) 22:25, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
all fine - check wording. Six stones for 5 regiments? Victuallers (talk) 17:54, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I wondered about that too, but it's what the source said. C'est la vive.--Gen. Bedford his Forest 20:32, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I added 10th Mississippi Infantry, which 8th Ohio Volunteers (talk · contribs) created; I'd get nom for the 10th, and create credit for the Monument.--Gen. Bedford his Forest 20:54, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This is a short article that barely makes it over the 1500 character minimum. Much of the text is not covered by inline citations. Perhaps work on expanding the article slightly and adding extra sources. Also work on explaining the concepts for the prospective reader who will be unfamiliar with the subject and avoid digression from the subject as much as possible --Flewis(talk) 03:14, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The Sigiriya rock and surrounding gardens
The Sigiriya rock and surrounding gardens
A little more context would help. Where is Sigiriya? When did this happen?... --74.13.129.207 (talk) 15:36, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The article's sentence reads: ..."making its outline practically invisible." The ref is unavailable online so, help, which is it (invisible vs. practically invisible)? --Rosiestep (talk) 17:03, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Practically, sorry had the FAC thing in my head that all adverbs are inherrently evil. :) --Mike - Μολὼν λαβέ 19:17, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Length, date verified. Offline hook reference accepted in good faith. --Rosiestep (talk) 23:02, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Length, date verified. The hook's foreign-language and offline references are accepted in good faith. --Rosiestep (talk) 16:42, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Downtown Troy, NY, in fall
Downtown Troy, NY, in fall

Articles created/expanded on October 25

This article's hook is unsourced or too long or there are other content issues Two concerns: first, the article's a little short; the prose comes to only 1350 characters which is short of the minimum of 1500. Perhaps the list of his previous appointments could be prosified? And secondly, I'm not sure the given reference supports the statement that he's the first Yorkshireman to take the post: it gives no indication that Gordon Fallows, for example, wasn't born in the county. It's a nice hook to use if we can deal with those two things, though! Olaf Davis | Talk 13:21, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
We have expanded article and added a further source (first source says the 3rd bishop was the closest the diocese had had to a Yorkshire-born bishop and that the 5th and 6th bishops were originally from Tyneside and Lancashire. Further source shows that 4th bishop [Gordon Fallows]was from [Barrow-in-Furness]. ChapterandVerse (talk) 21:12, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • This article's hook is unsourced or too long or there are other content issues Length (over 1860 characters) and date verified. However, the sources you have provided do not support the statement. The first source only mentions Steve Croft in one sentence. This sentence does not say that Croft was the first bishop born in Yorkshire. The second source doesn't even mention "Steve Croft" or Yorkshire. Cunard (talk) 04:45, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This hook works better if Kukruse has an article in English Wikipedia. Pls consider creating it and make this a double-DYK hook. You have ~4 days. --74.13.126.203 (talk) 17:12, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
verified the village that it is named after, but could not find 1362 in any of the references and one said early 1500s. It's real strange that over half of the web references are already inaccessible. Royalbroil 05:35, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for seeking clarification. The reference to 1362 AD is given in http://www.udaipur.org.uk/lakes/pichola-lake.html Pichola lake. I just opened it and verified the year as 1362. I will also add it in the text reference after the year. Please let me know any other reference about which you have some reservations.Thank you--Nvvchar (talk) 06:46, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Eligibility, length, and source for hook fact verified. However, I think it would be helpful to add an indication of where Tuam is, so I suggest the following alternate hook (omitting the date because I couldn't figure out where to put it:
that St Mary's Cathedral, Tuam in County Galway, Ireland, contains a 12th century arch which has been called "the finest example of Hiberno-Romanesque architecture"?
--Orlady (talk) 14:26, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
As an aside, does this break Unwritten Rule C2? :) GeeJo (t)(c) • 23:13, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I think it does...and it's not really notable or interesting. I would definitely go with the first hook. —Politizer talk/contribs 23:25, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Where to put "(pictured)"? --74.13.128.225 (talk) 14:51, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I took out the picture. Ceoil sláinte 21:31, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Canal du midi
Canal du midi
Much better, thank you. Nancy talk 11:04, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Where to put "(pictured)"?--74.13.128.225 (talk) 14:51, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
How's that? DurovaCharge! 08:21, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speaker iconThe Transit of Venus March

Which week? --74.13.126.203 (talk) 17:09, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Awards and achievements Preceded by Casablanca Academy Award for Best Picture 1944 Going My Way Succeedeb by The Lost Weekend

The 1944 Best Picture hardly needs special citation. Going My Way the film has no source but IMDB either. In fact, nearly all of the Wikipedia entertainment articles are from IMDb and little else.Billy Hathorn (talk) 02:04, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No source? No place on the main page!
"Kelly's only attempt at series television"? Do North and South (TV miniseries) and Sins (miniseries) count as Kelly's attempts at series television? Or was that some other guy with the same name? --76.64.76.218 (talk) 16:26, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Costa Allegra
Costa Allegra
  • Two possibilities here:
"Rip Van Winkle", by Waldo Peirce, in the Troy, NY, post office lobby
"Rip Van Winkle", by Waldo Peirce, in the Troy, NY, post office lobby
Troy post office
Troy post office
Bumpnose trevally
Bumpnose trevally
Let's remove one "Australian". Unless naturalized, siblings ought to have the same nationalities, right? --74.13.128.225 (talk) 19:53, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
extra one removed Assize (talk) 20:47, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Helen Westwood is the sister of Frank Bennett I believe, and not the brother? Chamal talk 13:33, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

See also