Jump to content

User talk:Ser Amantio di Nicolao

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Dr. Blofeld (talk | contribs) at 22:13, 2 November 2008 (Blofeld). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Archive

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Beaver Creek State Forest, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.stateparks.com/beaver_creek_columbiana.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 04:22, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Brush Creek State Forest, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.stateparks.com/brush_creek.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 04:22, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Dean State Forest, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.placesohio.com/ohio-state-forests/dean. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 04:22, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Fernwood State Forest, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.placesohio.com/ohio-state-forests/fernwood/index.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 04:22, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Hocking State Forest, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.dnr.state.oh.us/forests/hocking/tabid/5156/Default.aspx. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 04:23, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Harrison State Forest, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.wildernet.com/pages/area.cfm?areaID=OHSFH&CU_ID=1. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 04:23, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Mohican-Memorial State Forest, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.dnr.state.oh.us/forests/mohican/tabid/5160/Default.aspx. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 04:23, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Perry State Forest, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.dnr.state.oh.us/forests/perry/tabid/5161/Default.aspx. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 04:24, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Scioto Trail State Forest, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.dnr.state.oh.us/parks/sciototr/tabid/787/Default.aspx. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 04:25, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Shawnee State Forest, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.dnr.state.oh.us/tabid/5166/default.aspx. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 04:25, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Yellow Creek State Forest, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.dnr.state.oh.us/forests/shawnee/tabid/5166/Default.aspx. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 04:25, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Stubs

Please, please, please stop creating articles simply for the sake of creating them. Articles such as Pike State Forest are completely useless. I'm trying not to be rude, but many of the articles you have created are worthless in the state they're in. These articles consist of one simple sentence restating the article name and then telling what it is. That's it. It would be useful to have coordinates, an external link/reference, or something'. While yes, these could be expanded in the near or distant future, I feel there is a better way to handle this, such as a WP:List. How about List of state forests in Ohio? Or instead of having 100+ articles like Inglecress, Virginia, a much better alternative would be List of unincorporated communities in Albermarle County, Virginia. Then an independent article could be created later when there's enough information to warrant one. Please, it would be much easier for everyone to have a concise list rather than needing to go through tens or hundreds of one-liners which provide no unique information. Reywas92Talk 21:03, 15 October 2008 (UTC) I'm watching this page[reply]

Yeah, and a list of the places with relevant redirects to it is completeness as well. Really, the general public would rather see an actual article instead of one sentence. There is NO reason to have thousands of one-liners for "completeness" when a) these one-liners are obviously not complete, as a they contain no useful information, and b) a list would serve the exact same purpose but more concise. I see that you have been working with Blofeld; he also creates place stubs, but they include beneficial external links and an infobox, such as Guthu. These places are in the US; population, etc. should be accessible and included. We really aren't kidding when we say Quality, not quantity. Thanks, Reywas92Talk 21:20, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Just another comment, please don't do this again. §hep¡Talk to me! 00:50, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As someone who has encouraged Albert, I must comment on this. While I agree that very short stubs in certain areas (e.g. fictional characters, businesses) are undesirable, such stubs are, in my view, very helpful with respect to town and location articles. These are clearly notable subjects and articles on them are desirable. Having even a short stub is therefore helpful in terms of providing some basic information on the town and is a fantastic way to draw in new editors into contributing in desirable areas. A prospective new editor is far more likely to contribute to a stub article then they are to attempt to create a whole new Wikipedia page. Therefore, I respectfully disagree with your premise and your admonition to Albert.--Kubigula (talk) 15:57, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to argue aginst you on that one. I can look at an infobox and see of XYZ is an unincorporated community in State. A one liner article reiterating the title and info in the infobox is undesirable in all aspects. I'd rather see one article like Pike State Forest be created by you than an article like Perry State Forest which we have to agree is quite useless. Not one external link, reference, footnote, infobox, or talk page banner. IMO many of these qualify for CSD. We don't have to create one-liners because we don't have an article on the subject. Either wait until someone takes the time to create a decent article, or please make these ones worthwile. §hep¡Talk to me! 17:10, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Even something like Siegenthaler-Kaestner Esker State Nature Preserve would be okay, minus pic. It didn't even needs refs, but that way the new guy who wants to edit but is afraid to create an article (or is an IP) atleast has 1 resource given to them so it can be expanded. §hep¡Talk to me! 17:36, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I see the many stubs Alfred created on Virginia towns and natural areas as having added significant value, though admittedly many had more content than the ones you cite. Personally, I view almost any beginning of an article on a notable subject as having value, though I see your side of that argument as well. You may well think that his time would be better spent elsewhere. However, we are all volunteers here and we all have different things we like doing and ways of advancing the ball. A simple suggestion that he add a little more meat to his stubs or giving specific ideas on additional content are perfectly fine - I suspect Alfred would have embraced that. Telling him to stop and calling his efforts completely useless and worthless are not the right way to address this.--Kubigula (talk) 04:51, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bots and translation

Hi Albert. I've mentioned something to User talk:Jimbo Wales about it. Blofeld of SPECTRE (talk) 15:40, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You mean because of your useless creation of articles like Pike State Forest? Duh. I of course am being sarcastic, if you didn't read that!! Blofeld of SPECTRE (talk) 16:32, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. However you need to maximise the possibility of it being expanded by at least adding an external link to the Ohio Forest Resources site and another others. Try to add a fact or two such as :"The forest covers an area of 3456 acres and was founded in 1952" etc. For instance something like Acadia Cliffs State Nature Preserve Blofeld of SPECTRE (talk) 17:07, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going on a wikibreak now for a day or two, best of luck Blofeld of SPECTRE (talk) 17:51, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Albemarle County locales

You created a metric pantload of entries for locations in Albemarle County, Virginia, most of which don't actually exist, whether in the historical or contemporary records, lacking any specific citation. But that's not my complaint. My complaint is that, in all of these dozens and dozens of identical, single-sentence entries, you've misspelled "Albemarle County" as "Albermarle County." I can only assume that you used some sort of an automated tool to create these. If you don't intend to delete these things, would you at least please correct them to spell "Albemarle" correctly? If you're going to go making mistakes en masse automatically, I just can't see fixing all of these by hand. --WaldoJ (talk) 03:01, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:CumberlandForestEntry.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 00:22, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Juvenaly of Alaska, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.stjuvenaly.org/juvenaly.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 15:01, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Đorđe Bogic, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.orthodoxwiki.org/Djordje_Bogic. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 04:33, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Biographies

Looks interesting. Oh I'll be sorting through buildings and structures by asian country to make the building and struct cats viable so they to hit 60 articles e.g Category:Afghan building and structure stubs. Do you think you could help me like you did with Antarctica and create some stubs on landmarks by country in Asia if needs be. I've done Afghasnistan, Armenia and Azerbaijan, Bangladesh is next. First of all they need stub sorting and then seeing if they are viable like Category:Armenian building and structure stubs. Right now though I am stubbing some articles on Croatian architects Blofeld of SPECTRE (talk) 21:03, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've recently created a set of Asian structure tenmplates here. What we need to do is completely get rid of the "Category:Asian building and structure stubs" by splitting by country. In order for this to be valid we need 60 articles on buildings for each asian country. It was ridiculous I came across an article on an Azeri TV tower and it had an "asia-struct stub" tag attatched to it with a picture of Angkot Wat Cambodia. I was saying to Alai the other day that it would be like an Irish pub in Dublin having a Euro-struct tag on it depicting Hagia Sophia mosque in Istanbul!

What needs doing is to stub sort first e.g go through all the articles for e,g Category:Buildings and structures in Bangladesh and stub sort them by adding Bangladesh-struct-stub and removing any general stub templates being used like bangladesh-stub or asia-struct-stub. Once you have gone through all of the articles in the relative cats e.g bridges, mosques, dams etc there should be over 60 articles in the stub category. If not then they need topping up to ensure they do, The other day I generated a few stubs on Afghan mosques, Armenian monasteries and Azerbaijani airports. Its quite straightforward to do and is actually a good way of browsing through what we already have. Let me know if you can help out, start backwards with Yemen if you like with sorting Yemen-struct-stub Blofeld of SPECTRE (talk) 21:17, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A good way is to look in the commons and see if there are any interesting buildings in cities etc that are missing. There should also be numerous red links in articles on the major cities plus lists like List of airports in Bangladesh etc.Blofeld of SPECTRE (talk) 21:22, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes the idea is to do one or two at a time rather than the whole of Asia, I work best that way too. I'll set up all the categories in a minute. On a quick check it looks like we need another 10 articles for Uzbekistan but its probably best to top them up after they have all been tagged. Thanks Blofeld of SPECTRE (talk) 17:01, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yemen? Probably mosques and well... more mosques! Full of Arabs, I remember seeing it on the Tudor Parfitt documentary. Tajikistan and Turkmenistan might be difficult but some of the others should be easier if they dont have 60 already which Bangladesh didBlofeld of SPECTRE (talk) 17:15, 23 October 2008 (UTC) Urgh I'm having spware trouble again which is affecting my PC. Highly annoying, keeps freezing all the timeBlofeld of SPECTRE (talk) 17:17, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I see what you mean about Yemen. Practically empty Blofeld of SPECTRE (talk) 17:23, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Ivan Albright.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Ivan Albright.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. dave pape (talk) 01:24, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also Image:GraceAlbee.jpg & Image:EllsworthKellyPortrait.jpg. There are two things you should be aware of - 1, the Smithsonian is a half-government, half-private institution, and so claims that all their work is not PD-USGov, but copyrighted; 2, these photos are not even work of the Smithsonian, they are simply part of its collection, and were created by private photographers. --dave pape (talk) 01:24, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

French fluency

Yum yum

Hi Albert, I read on your userpage that you are fluent in French. Could you please translate This for me at User:Editorofthewiki/Sandbox/Hubert Maga. I'm working on Hubert Maga to Good and (hopefully) Featured article status and given there is not much on him, this would be an excellent source. ~one of many editorofthewikis (talk/contribs/editor review)~ 16:06, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I thought you could use a hamburger as you seemed hungry. Eat up boy!Blofeld of SPECTRE (talk) 18:58, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hehe. Yes SPECTRE are renowned for doing things like that! Unless you have been guilty of embezzlement however, I think you are safe. Heheh that burger reminds my of the Foo Fighters Learn to Fly video. Blofeld of SPECTRE (talk) 19:08, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I was thinking of shortening by user name to Dr. Blofeld. SOunds more evil. What do you think? Blofeld of SPECTRE (talk) 19:14, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've filed a request to change it to Dr. Blofeld as it is partly Dr. Evil isn't it LOL. SHould crash wikipedia for an hour or two while it changes all those edits! Blofeld of SPECTRE (talk) 19:26, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Its undergoing change now I think. Wow check out the server lag 293 seconds!! Is that a record? Blofeld of SPECTRE (talk) 20:21, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"I've been expecting you" Dr. Blofeld (talk) 20:30, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cool. I feel just that little bit more evil and ready to dominate now. LOL did you see my SPECTRE world logo with the blown up middle east! (not that you can miss it) The Turkish government failed to deliver the shipment of Turkish delight to Kyoto, Japan so naturally I sought revenge by blowing up the Bosphorous and Istanbul! As a result Europe, particularly Eastern Europe and western Russia looks like frickin Tierra del Fuego LOL. Anyway back to more serious stuff Dr. Blofeld (talk) 20:45, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh I agree, didn't want to come across as a clown thats all! Hey you should be full after that burger. How about a nice British meal of Bangers and Mash? (although I must admit that image looks like somebodys shat twice on a birds egg).Dr. Blofeld (talk) 20:59, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I just checked on cologne blue and it looks crap (I'm using modern at present). Try it on monobook or modern, it looks much better. Yes I also think the featured picture should go on the top right but I'm rather restricted in my knowledge of computer /web designing. Its only because they are going to change the main page soon enough and are whittling down the candidates. It was a suggestion to User:Pretzel's proposal See Wikipedia:2008 main page redesign proposal/straw poll 2008-10-18. Dr. Blofeld 17:32, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Another idea combining two of the best entries Wikipedia:2008 main page redesign proposal/Dr. Blofeld 2. The alignment is cocked up but you get the idea if there was no gaps or double borders Dr. Blofeld 22:09, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Translation

Hi AlbertHerring! Would you please translate the following text into english for me, "Alors nos producteurs respectifs se sont arrangés". Thanks, sincerely Condamine (talk) 18:09, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Jacob Netsvetov, and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: Jacob of Alaska. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 21:24, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Olga Michael, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://orthodoxwiki.org/Olga_Michael. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 21:45, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Maga

Are you still working on the translation? ~one of many editorofthewikis (talk/contribs/editor review)~ 19:54, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blofeld

Count de Blojean. O Count of Piz Gloria

LOL Blofeld look alike. Doesn't he look a lot like Telly Savalas!Dr. Blofeld (talk) 22:09, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]