User talk:87.202.128.46

What the hell is wrong with you?

For the last time, quit spamming the Anzu section. Geg 15:54, 8 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

i don't know if i am doing this right, so i don't know if you will ever see this, i wish i had a way to talk to you directly so i would tell you why i am doing this. Anyway, i hope you can see this.

I am not spamming the Tea page, if you weren't deleting this i wouldn't post anything else. It's just that i don't feel that i am saying anything bad, why my post can't stay on the page ? Anyway, hope you know that i am not spamming and i am not a spammer.

This is Wikipedia, meaning it's an information site. In other words, there can't be an opinions or opiniated articles or parts in an article. Which is what you were doing. Geg 18:48, 8 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

What makes what i am saying an opinion ? Maybe that what really is ....

This message is regarding the article Anzu Mazaki. Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. [ contribs • block • block log ] Rob e rt 04:13, 9 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

It's not nonsense .... It's True, But still, ok, i won't change it again. Sorry if it was considered "vandalism", "spamming" or whatever, it wasn't meant to be, only wanted to tell people that Tea is the best ....

You still readded it, and I had to revert it again. Having an opinion about her is all fine and well, but this is a strictly neutral point of view encyclopedia. Please do not add it again, or I will have no choice but to block you. Rob e rt 15:31, 9 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry, i said i won't change it again and i won't i only changed it one last time, before i read what you said. No reason to do that anymore .... If it is so important to you then it's ok. I didn't know that articles can't have opinions included. But why does it have to be so neutral anyway ? I Believe opinion articles would be better and more informant. Anyway, opinion always counts ....

Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. I'm not disputing that. It's not so much that this specific article is so important to me, it's the fact that allowing opinions in any article makes other users think that they can add their opinions anywhere. Take Encyclopædia Britannica for example; it's written in NPOV, because it's an encyclopedia being distributed to many people that have different opinions about certain subjects. Wikipedia works the same way. If Wikipedia allowed opinions to be posted, than the George W. Bush article would be riddled with people saying "He is awful" or "He is the greatest President ever." The bottom line is that not everyone agrees with everyone else's opinion, and therefore an encyclopedia must be written objectively and with a NPOV. Rob e rt 18:08, 9 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Ok then i get it. You got your reason to have such a policy and that's respected by me then. It's nice to have a respected opinion but not to say it here i get it. Maybe i will make a post with more information then and i hope you won't delete that too.

It's not really my policy, it's Wikipedia's policy. If you have some good info to add to any article, by all means do so. Rob e rt 18:41, 9 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.