Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moral realm
This phrase was coined by Michael E. Berumen, a philosopher who appears to be non-notable. All my research has failed to turn up anything establishing his notability. Thus, this article is non-notable at best, and original research at worst. Please be aware that there have been suspicions of sockpuppet-ish activity regarding articles pertaining to Mr. Berumen. Consider comments on this AfD page accordingly. --Ashenai (talk) 12:24, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
- Delete: Berumen is self-published and appears to have had no public recognition/acceptance/criticism of his work. ElectricRay 13:26, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
- Delete - pseudo-philosophy and also a concept which has been better elucidated elsewhere. --MacRusgail 17:07, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Dottore So 09:42, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
- Merge brief notes into Michael E. Berumen; Berumen is notable enough to deserve a mention on Wikipedia, but he's not so notable that we need separate articles on all his theories. Of course, if the consensus decides that Berumen himself isn't notable (see separate AfD for Berumen above), this should be deleted too. Haeleth 12:33, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
- Keep I don't know why MacRusgail (above) calls it a psuedo-philosophy. I rather suspect he hasn't read his book, so that strikes me as an excessive claim. It is very much a real philosophy. His idea of the conjoint princile impartial rationality extending to all who can suffer has not, insofar as I am aware, been elucidated better or at all elsewhere. He does have a public that comes to listen to him speak at many kinds of venues. icut4u