Talk:Castlevania (1999 video game)

Sorry, I should have put my reason for the NPOV tag before. Anyway, the second paragraph just bashes the game and praises IGA's LOI for correcting all of the CV64's flaws. Although LOI fixed some of CV64's problems, it also created several new ones (I will name them if you want me to).

"However, years later IGA set out to fix those problems and unleashes Castlevania: Lament of Innocence for the PS2 which improves everything that plagued this game, and even surpasses it in a lot of ways."

That sentence is all ones opinion and this article shouldn't be a comparison of the two 3D games. This article reads more like an IGA Castlevania fanboy review on GameFaqs. Maybe add a "Critisms" section and talk about the game's flaws and briefly mention how IGA took a different approach with the cameras in LOI. Buzda 10:36, 27 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that this shouldn't be included. There's no source provided that shows Igarashi developed Lament of Innocence with the intention of addressing what he felt was wrong with the N64 games. (And even if he did, it belongs on the LoI page, not here.) Also, the whole part about "improves [...] surpasses [...]" is opinion and bias. It is enough to say that this game has been removed from the official timeline. Guermantes 15:24, 28 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Someone removed all the inappropriate commentary. I've removed the NPOV tag, re-written the introduction (in part), added some cited facts. Guermantes 05:03, 13 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]