User talk:Mr-Natural-Health

John Gohde, aka Mr-Natural-Health

Richmond, Virginia, USA, Planet Earth, The Sun, Milky Way galaxy

Welcome to my talk page. If you would like me to reply to anything, this is the best place to drop me a line.

Wikipedia:Requests for comment/RK has been created as structured way to gather support in the Wikipedian community for action to be taken against user:RK for his consistent use of aggressive editing tactics that are counter productive to the development of high quality encyclopedic articles. Now, is your chance to voice your grievances against user:RK. Please take a few minutes of your time to air your comments. Feel free to expand the list of problem areas by adding problems or grievences of your own. -- John Gohde, aka Mr-Natural-Health 13:58, 12 Apr 2004 (UTC)

Why do judges and lawyers scream so much in court?

I noticed you were wondering about this topic. It has fascinated me for years, being a lawyer and someone with a naturally loud voice I have been accused more than once for "yelling" when I was speaking in my normal voice. I think that judges get very frustrated when lawyers in front of them don't agree with their approach to the law and lawyers scream at judges because there are some judges (especially at the trial level) that are not always right and appeal is such an expensive undertaking that it frustrates lawyers to be forced into such a position by a judge. Also keep in mind that many judges are elderly and their hearing may not be that great so a lawyer may have to resort to yelling to get heard. But by far the most common reason that there are "screaming litigators" (note that not all, or even many lawyers, are litigators) is that their clients scream at them or demand they do the impossible. Just some observations. — Alex756 [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Alex756 talk] 18:11, 28 Mar 2004 (UTC)

League of Trollz!

We should unite under the banner of the League of Trollz! Trolling for truth and justice! Lirath Q. Pynnor

Yes! In my user pages I have correctly defined troll. And, I have even started a documented list. Due to her recent activities, I will have add a certain person to yet another documented list. -- John Gohde, aka Mr-Natural-Health 18:22, 4 Apr 2004 (UTC)

I concur, Im an old "troll/Gadfly" lets call ourselves the red faction! Comrade Nick

They are trying to delete Dan Waniek at vfd. Please come vote. Lirath Q. Pynnor

Alternative medicine

I have protected the alternative medicine page and set up a mediation dialogue on the talk page in hopes that you and RK can come to a compromise. Please see Talk:Alternative_medicine#Page_protection. --Αλεξ Σ 16:06, 11 Apr 2004 (UTC)

I need Evidence

Show me evidence that RK is involved with vadalism and i will do what you say thanks. Comrade Nick

I'm going to try to work with you, as much as possible I seen you and RK, involved in a lot of edit wars, my suggestion is to cool it a little, so i could work with you (PS Great Webpage John i love the way you cover the topic of alternative medicine on your website). Comrade Nick

Wikipedia:Requests for comment/RK has been created by me as structured way to voice your grievances against the editing tactics of user:RK. It is not just about vandalism. A list of identified problem areas has been developed. Feel free to expand the list of problem areas by adding problems or grievances of your own. -- John Gohde, aka Mr-Natural-Health 14:10, 12 Apr 2004 (UTC)

OK

I'll look into this issue between you and RK and I will voice my grievances against if i feel there is a violation of Wiki's rules, I see he did violate the 3 revert rule but it's hard to tell if he knew about it {you did too :), but it's hard to see who is on the defence and who's on the offencive}. Comrade Nick

"Controversial" notice

Quoting Wikipedia:List of controversial issues: "Type {{msg:controversial}} on top of the controversial article's discussion page". This has always been the guideline for the simple reason that such a message is permanent. We write for our readers, not for other editors, and notices that are only of interest to editors belong on the discussion page, not on the article. The NPOV dispute notice goes on the article because it is useful to readers, and because it is not permanent (any such dispute should be resolved within a reasonable time framework).--Eloquence * 00:06, Apr 14, 2004 (UTC)

Lets Make a Deal

i have seen that Robert, gotten in to many edit wars with a lot of users, that's why im proposing cease-fire between you two, my suggestion is to avoid one another don't point fingers, and i will try to resolve your differences. tell me if you approve Comrade Nick

I will pass on that. I doubt that RK will respond to anybody, anyway. My public comment efforts on RK have proved quite successful. And, as I will follow through on the dispute process, I need to ask him a few things directly. I am not going to avoid him, and I will point fingers. -- John Gohde, aka Mr-Natural-Health 04:37, 14 Apr 2004 (UTC)