User talk:Bonaparte

Multumesc :) Nu e usor sa faci dezbatere cu rusi si cu tradatorii aia de basarabeni care isi scuipa poporul si istoria neamului romanesc, dar asta e. --Anittas 01:35, 9 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Sa stii ca ma consider Roman (desi traiesc in basarabia) si ceea ce tu ai spus, in special "tradatorii aia de basarabeni" chiar m-a ofensat...

Imi place mult comparatiile care le-ai facut intre limbi si constitutiile celor doua state. Tot inainte! :) --Anittas 20:36, 9 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Bonaparte

De ce Bonaparte daca esti roman? Nu mi se pare corect! --Dacodava Ar trebui totusi sa-ti exprimi identitatea de roman. Chiar daca si eu il simpatizez pe Napoleon, nu cred ca e cazul sa-mi asum istoria unei alte natiuni.Dacodava

About the "so-called Moldovan language" and Romanian

Hi Bonaparte,

Yes, you're right, every linguist knows what you're saying is essentially correct. However, there are minor distinguos to be made in terms of: (1) What is the difference between a language and a dialect; (2) standard language vs. dialects; (3) national language vs. language from a linguist's point of view, and so on and so forth. Romanian, or more precisely Daco-Romanian, is obviously one language, but it has some dialectal variation (not a whole lot, really, compared to some other European languages), among Oltenian, Muntenian, Transylvanian, Moldavian dialects, etc. (I am referring to the Moldavia, or Moldova, that is part of Romania, not to the old province of Bessarabia, which corresponds more or less with the present-day country of Moldova).

When the Soviets decided to invent a "Moldovan" language, they essentially took standard Romanian, wrote it in Cyrillic (to be fair, that is the way Romanian was written up until the mid-nineteenth century anyway), and gave it just a little regional flavor by adding some dialectal features, characteristic however of the Moldavian dialect within Romania, not specifically of the Bessarabian dialect). But these dialectal features are not very significant.

As a result, there is no question that Moldovan and Romanian are essentially the same language. So, what is the difference between a language and a dialect? "A language is a dialect with an army and a navy" (a quote from Antoine Meillet, but also -- erroneously??? -- attributed to Max Weinreich, Uriel Weinreich, and Joshua Fishman). That's it. Consider the case of Dutch. Technically, linguists should consider it a dialect of German, specifically the Netherlandic subgroup of the Lower Franconian dialect group (there is of course huge variation among the dialects of German), but imagine telling the Dutch that. They are a very proud national group. And what about the difference between Dutch and Flemish? Of course, the Flemish dialects are a distinct subgroup of Lower Franconian dialects than the dialects of Holland, but in Belgium they use the same standard language as in Holland, so, despite the dialectal differences, the Dutch/Flemish standard language is the same. Finally, one additional complication: all the dialects from the eastern part of the Netherlands aren't even Lower Franconian, but Lower Saxon dialects, just like the Plattdeutch dialects of the German state of Niedersachsen.

So, what do you want me to say? Historically, whether Moldovan and Romanian will be considered different "languages" (not, of course, from a linguist's point of view, which they will never be really, but in the sense of "national languages") will depend on whether they will remain as separate countries in the centuries ahead. So, ultimately, this whole question has a lot more to do with politics than with linguistics.

I hope I didn't disappoint you. Îmǐ place foarte mult limba romînǎ. Pasquale 22:31, 9 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, Bonaparte, most linguists consider Aroumanian (or Macedo-Romanian), Istro-Romanian, and Meglenitic as separate languages, not dialects. That's why I said above: "Romanian, or more precisely Daco-Romanian, is obviously one language". By specifying Daco-Romanian, I was precisely excluding Aroumanian, Istro-Romanian, and Meglenitic. As far as the dialectal variation within Daco-Romanian, well, it's not completely insignificant. I remember looking at a Romanian Dialect Atlas once and finding considerable variation, especially within Transylvania, if I remember correctly. Anyway, these are minor points.

I am very sorry about the vandalism you're complaining about. However, I am a little tired right now of Wikipedia fights and I would rather not get involved in another one, if you don't mind, especially knowing how vicious some of these can get. Sorry! Pasquale 17:18, 10 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Bonaparte, Please don't push me. I've had a couple of bruising Wikipedia fights recently and my conclusion is that they lead nowhere. Besides, I am extremely busy with work right now, and I know this kind of effort takes A LOT of time, because you have to explain things VERY, VERY clearly to convince people. But, if something needs to be voted on, I will vote. Pasquale 18:04, 10 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

 Thanks for your nice words. Unfortunately I can not be so much time on net.
 You make a good job. Keep doing it!!! Dacodava

Thanks

Thanks for the useful comparison. Maybe the difference is like the difference between Swiss German and (Standard) German. I have a clearer picture now. How did you find my question anyway? :) Best, Dpr 03:31, 13 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome! Glad to help you. Bonaparte talk & contribs

Barnstar

Salut. Mulţumesc pentru barnstar! Ronline 09:43, 21 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Mersi si eu pentru stea. --Anittas 09:49, 21 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Salut, Bonaparte. Multam' fain pentru barnstar. User:Dpotop

Thanks man!

I like this star :)
EvilAlex 12:46, 21 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Admin

You know, if you start changing your edit tactics now, you can be an Admin in the future. That is, if you want to. It's not too late to change, and if you do, I'm sure many people would vote for you in the future, including me. Alexander 007 12:33, 11 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Remember, you chose the name Bonaparte. Alexander 007 12:42, 11 December 2005 (UTC) Multumesc Alexandru. Bonaparte talk 12:50, 11 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Orioane's RfA

Pe tine te-am lăsat mai la urmă, ca să scriu un mesaj personalizat. Iată-l pe cel standard:

Hey Bonaparte! Thank you very much for your support on my RfA. To my amazement there were no negative or neutral votes and the result was (28/0/0). I am now an administrator so I'll try and do my best in this new position. I'll be happy to answer any comments or requests from you. Thanks one more time!

Acum, în plus, ai fost cel mai puternic suporter al meu şi pentru asta îţi mulţumesc în mod special. Cu siguranţă o să mai lucrăm împreună la articole, aşa că sigur o să discutăm şi în viitor. Eu o să intru într-o Wikipauză şi sper să ajung pe acasă, aşa că îţi urez "Crăciun Fericit" şi "La Mulţi Ani!". --Mihai -^talk 20:39, 13 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

Secrets of Effective Leadership

I like very much what Fred Manske once said: "To me, a leader is a visionary who energizes others. This definition has two key dimensions: (1) creating a vision of the future and (2) inspiring people to make the vision reality".

Bonaparte talk 17:28, 16 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Your personal vision should do three things:

1.It should incorporate your dreams and passions; the things that excite you.

2.It should be authentic and true to your realities, anchored in who you really are. It doesn't have to meet anyone else's standards.

3.It should continue to evolve. Personal vision is not static, like a photograph, but rather like frames from a videotape that change slightly from day to day. It reflects where you are in your own evolution and where you think you are heading.

Take a moment here to reflect a bit your personal vision.

What are you passionate about?

What are your dreams?

Where do you want to be in five years? Ten years?

If you live your life to its fullest, what will you have accomplished?

What impact do you want to make?

Bonaparte talk 17:38, 16 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Israel

Hello Bonaparte,
What I can find about Romania's ascension to the EU is at the BBC. You may also want to see Enlargement of the European Union, it has sections on both Romania and Israel. Regarding Israel and the EU, I don't know much. I live in England and therefore already am a European citizen. In 2007 you will be too :-) Izehar (talk) 11:52, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Izehar for your link :) Bonaparte talk 14:38, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Un raspuns intarziat

Multumesc din nou. Keep in touch.Dahn 20:13, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Couplet I

Allons enfants de la Patrie,

Le jour de gloire est arrivé !

Contre nous de la tyrannie,

L'étendard sanglant est levé, (bis)

Entendez-vous dans les campagnes

Mugir ces féroces soldats ?

Ils viennent jusque dans vos bras

Égorger vos fils et vos compagnes !

Refrain

Aux armes, citoyens,

Formez vos bataillons,

Marchons, marchons !

Qu'un sang impur

Abreuve nos sillons !

Couplet II

Que veut cette horde d'esclaves

De traîtres, de rois conjurés ?

Pour qui ces ignobles entraves

Ces fers dès longtemps préparés ? (bis)

Français, pour nous, ah ! quel outrage

Quels transports il doit exciter ?

C'est nous qu'on ose méditer

De rendre à l'antique esclavage !

Refrain

Couplet III

Quoi ces cohortes étrangères !

Feraient la loi dans nos foyers !

Quoi ! ces phalanges mercenaires

Terrasseraient nos fils guerriers ! (bis)

Grand Dieu ! par des mains enchaînées

Nos fronts sous le joug se ploieraient

De vils despotes deviendraient

Les maîtres des destinées.

Refrain

Couplet IV

Tremblez, tyrans et vous perfides

L'opprobre de tous les partis

Tremblez ! vos projets parricides

Vont enfin recevoir leurs prix ! (bis)

Tout est soldat pour vous combattre

S'ils tombent, nos jeunes héros

La France en produit de nouveaux,

Contre vous tout prêts à se battre

Refrain

Couplet V

Français, en guerriers magnanimes

Portez ou retenez vos coups !

Épargnez ces tristes victimes

À regret s'armant contre nous (bis)

Mais ces despotes sanguinaires,

Mais ces complices de Bouillé

Tous ces tigres qui, sans pitié

Déchirent le sein de leur mère !

Refrain

Couplet VI

Amour sacré de la Patrie,

Conduis, soutiens nos bras vengeurs

Liberté, Liberté chérie,

Combats avec tes défenseurs ! (bis)

Sous nos drapeaux que la victoire

Accoure à tes mâles accents,

Que tes ennemis expirants

Voient ton triomphe et notre gloire !

Refrain

Couplet VII

Nous entrerons dans la carrière

Quand nos aînés n'y seront plus,

Nous y trouverons leur poussière

Et la trace de leurs vertus (bis)

Bien moins jaloux de leur survivre

Que de partager leur cercueil,

Nous aurons le sublime orgueil

De les venger ou de les suivre !

WP:TINMC

Hi, you're down as being an an active cabalist. Is that still true? There are plenty of cases awaiting mediator response, please drop by if you can! Dan100 (Talk) 11:01, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Yes is true. I will do it. Bonaparte talk 12:55, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Oooh...

Multilingual page! I love it! Want Portuguese here? ε γκυκλοπαίδεια* 18:54, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Yes! Why not? -- Bonaparte talk 19:06, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Eu não sei o que eu devo dizer. Algumas coisas no português são difíceis de escrever. Talvez, escreverei algo no espanhol tambem! ε γκυκλοπαίδεια* 19:23, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

You may say everthing you like. What's your interest and how can we collaborate. Is not a problem for me, you may write in any langauge as you wish. I have to admit I would like not to be in English :) since I want to practice other languages as well. Thank you. -- Bonaparte talk 19:26, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

So far I see German, French, Italian, Romanian, now Portugues, naturally English; Spanish should be here too.... Y lo puedo hacer, me gusta hablar en el español...pero es un idioma muy fácil, entonces, no creo que hago algo tan especial.ε γκυκλοπαίδεια* 19:28, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly how many languages do you speak, I really admire people that speak a whole lot of them...ε γκυκλοπαίδεια* 19:29, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

sockpuppet accusations

G'day Bonaparte,

I notice you left a note on a vandal's talkpage, explaining that you believed the vandal to be a sockpuppet of User:node ue. You presented no evidence other than your well-known dislike of node_ue. This is the second time in the past few days that I, despite concerted efforts to avoid seeing any place you or node_ue are likely to edit, have seen you say something nasty about node_ue. If it keeps up, and I do not care what your reasons are, I will block you. Is that clear? fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 16:30, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Is clear. Anyway I would like to thank you so much for blocking the eventual vandal. It was very quick and I would like one more time to tell you that I appreciate this. Bonaparte talk 16:32, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks to some smart and talented ArbCommers willing to spare a few minutes, you have your answer: the vandal is definitely not User:node ue. There's your answer. What I'd like you to take away from this discussion is two simple things: don't accuse others blindly, and for Pete's sake shut up about node_ue, especially on unrelated users' talkpages or WP:AN/I. It's starting to cross over into "harrassment" territory, and I have a history of getting rather upset with people who harrass other users. Okay? fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 16:56, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I am not satisfied until I see the numbers. I want to see the IP adress. -- Bonaparte talk 17:03, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Tough. I can't see the numbers either; only six people can, and they're all from the Arbitration Committee and very careful not to give them out. However, I have their word that the vandal could not possibly be node_ue. If the word of the Arbitration Committee isn't good enough for you, I'm surprised you trust anything you hear. fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 17:09, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to see if it is from Arizona. Can this be checked please? -- Bonaparte talk 17:11, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The IP has been checked, and two members of the ArbCom are satisfied that the vandal is not node_ue. You may not know the IP address, and you may not know the location of any logged-in user unless they choose to reveal it to you . Now, drop it. fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 01:42, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Nein, ich fuerchte nur developers und arbcom members haben Zugriff auf die IP-Adressen von eingeloggten Usern. dab (ᛏ) 17:02, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Re:RfA

Thanks : ), but I have to decline. I do not wish, on any terms, to be an admin. Thanks for thinking I would be good for the job. : )

Take care, ε γκυκλοπαίδεια* 00:18, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Mihai Eminescu

Look Bonapart I don’t have anything against Romanians, I do have many Romanians friends. But In Moldova Eminescu recognised as a Moldavian poet and to say that he is a Romanian it is the same as to take him from us. Alternative would be to say that he is a poet of both Romania and Moldova; in this way we will not put one country in superior position over onather.
EvilAlex 12:07, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Now you do the same with me as for Anitta/Anittas. It's Bonaparte. Not Bonapart. I'm glad that you have romanian friends. As far as it is internationally recognized as a Romanian poet, fact that is also in Moldova recognized as a Romanian poet I have the opinion to let Romanian poet. Let it like this, in this way it's affirmed one more time the strong relationship between Romania and Moldova. I see no problem to state like this. I read today that the majority of people from Moldova wants to join EU. Bonaparte talk 12:35, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Transnistria

Some issues concerning Transnistria

Transnistria’s ethnic composition is unlike the rest of Moldova, and the region does not share the same interwar history as the rest of the country as part of socalled ‘‘Greater Romania.’’ Moreover, many of the ethnic Russians and Ukrainians that currently reside in Transnistria were not born in Moldova and only recently came to the country in the 1980s and 1990s (Note: Significantly, much of the current Transnistrian leadership, including Igor Smirnov, were born and raised in Russia and therefore not surprisingly have a different and hostile view of Moldovan identity and culture.)

The leadership has used these issues to cultivate a separate Transnistrian identity among youth and to socialize the population towards a Russian political space, rejecting European demands for democratization and conflict resolution. Transnistrian socialization has used traditional instruments including the media and school.

Indeed, one of the important agents of identity formation and socialization is education. There is a large political science literature that examines the impact that education has on group identity formation as well as on the process of individual political socialization. During the Soviet period, the education system in Moldova was used as a means to russify the indigenous titular population through the use of Russian language as the principle means of instruction.

Tudor Vladimirescu

Next block

Blocked for 1 week for persistent and fully aware distortion and deletion of official info, e.g., in Republic of Moldova, Tighina and in other places. This is considered persistent and malicious vandalism. Persistent removal of Cyrillic spelling of moldovan toponyms is an intolerable censorship of information. mikka (t) 21:38, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Read here very careful mikka: I was just reverting Node's edits which are considered persistent and malicious vandalism. So you have to block Node, not me! And your persistent adding of Cyrillic spelling of Moldovans toponyms is also persistent and malicious vandalism. Moldovan (Romanian)'s official spelling is in LATIN ALPHABET. So, block yourself! Bonaparte talk 08:26, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

You accused me for "persistent and fully aware distortion and deletion of oficial info, e.g., in Republic of Moldova, Tighina, and in other places"

Now, what about your "persistent and fully aware distortion and deletion of official info, e.g. the Cyrillic spelling for cities even if you know and you are aware that the official spelling is in LATIN?"

Someone block now Mikka because he blocked me for the same reason. Bonaparte talk 08:55, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Izehar's RfA

Hi Bonaparte,

I would like to thank you for your kind support on my RfA. I'll do my best to be a good administrator. If you need anything or if I ever do something I shouldn't have, please, don't hesitate to drop me a line. Izehar 16:44, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Unblocking

Yes, can you unblock me? -- Bonaparte talk 17:02, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I won't unblock you outright. I want you to promise that you will not edit-war on those articles again, but use the talk pages. If the edits you are trying to make are true, then I'm sure you can find the appropriate sources to back them. I'll see that you get unblocked when you promise to stop edit-warring. IMO mikka's block was excessive, but so is blatant edit-warring. Izehar 17:13, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Izehar, they are not happy because they lost the battle for Moldovan language. The article state now very clear that they are identical. Of course we have brought sources and proofs and we have discussed first on the talk page. But from time to time Mikka enjoys to block me and yes, he did it before. He remembers that he lost and he take advantage that he's Admin and can block me. For example right now he tries to push a POV (Moldovan is not write officially in Cyrillic. Why is he trying to make false statements?). Of course that not only me has reverted that "false data" but he blocked me when he feels that his arguments are not taken into account. We bring arguments, facts, sources and he brings the argument of force. I will never agree with such barbarian approach. Bonaparte talk 17:44, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Look Bonaparte, I don't know if Mikka or you are right. I want you to stop edit-warring. That's why Mikka can block you, because you edit-war. I don't know why he wants the Cyrillic place names as well, probably because of historical significance. Didn't Romanian used to be written in Cyrillic (500 years ago, whereas in Moldova 15 years ago). If you say that you'll stop edit-warring, I'll see to it that you are unblocked. Discuss your edits on the talk pages, don't edit war, because that can lead to sanctions from the Arbitration Committee. Izehar 18:17, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

We are right, Mikka is wrong.

As you can see he doesn't want consensus or talks. He just blocks. And yes, he did that before. As far as you can see also he was edit warring because he didn't brought any argument except for the argument of force (blocking). You think I don't want to be discussed? Definitely the Arbitration Committee can judge very well his bias measures. I am not afraid and I am open to any solution. I hope that this can be judged in a fair play manner. Bonaparte talk 19:03, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

And the Mikkalai's problem is that he always loose control of his temperament and instead of talking and discussing he is just using his privileges and power as Admin to block me because I have strong arguments. Bonaparte talk 19:13, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Look Bonaparte, I will not unblock you until you tell me you will not edit-war - that is why Mikka is allowed to block you. If you stop edit-warring, then I will be able to unblock you. Izehar 19:11, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

As far as we concern he should not edit-war. That's why he keeps blocking me. Take this as my defense statement I was just reacting to his provocking and false edits. Bonaparte talk 19:15, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Let's make a deal. If he makes revert war you block him. And if I make you block me. It's OK with you? Bonaparte talk 19:17, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

No Bonaparte, tell me that you will stop edit-warring and I will ask Mikka to also stop edit-warring and use the talk page. If you tell me that you will not edit-war, I will get you unblocked. Izehar 19:19, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Jmabel told mikka and he still continued in his approach (out of line blocking). I tell you that I stop edit war but in the same time I will defend the truth. The problem is that I believe that he will continue in his approach. No matter what. When the time comes I will remind you Izehar. You know, once I believed that he will change, but he didn't. So, even if I'm an optimistic person the relation with this Admin was rather pesimistic. Bonaparte talk 19:34, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

You may watch my moves if you want. Bonaparte talk 19:35, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Mikka blocked you for editing official info. If it's official, don't remove it. And yes, Mikka should have blocked Node a long time ago. Mikka, if you play by those rules, apply them to all. And I don't think it was nice to block Bonaparte on Christmas Ave. --Anittas 19:38, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid that I don't know Mikka or what he does. I do disagree with your block Bonaparte; a week is too long. You have already been blocked for almost 24 hours, that's how long we block vandals who make worse edits that you. One week is totally out of line IMO. I will unblock you if you say yes to the following:

If someone reverts you when you remove the Cyrillic names, don't revert back, even if it is true. Discuss it on the talk page.

I'm not doing this because I agree with Mikka, I'm doing it to ensure that the policy that Mikka enforced is actually observed. Edit warring is not allowed. If you agree to that, I will unblock you and have a word with Mikka about this situation. Remember what I said earlier, I cannot use administrative privileges to perform personal favours - only to carry out policy. Izehar 19:54, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Yes! Of course Izehar. I will discuss first on talk page and if it's not solved I ask you to block the vandal who makes revert war. Bonaparte talk 20:04, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Unblocked. If your IP address is still blocked, list it here or e-mail it to me (you can see how to e-mail me on my userpage). Izehar 20:20, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Izehar. I've send you also an email since my IP adress is still blocked. Bonaparte talk 20:29, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree with your unblocking without alking to me first. I am watching this user for a long time and I am doing what is right: eacalating punishment for persisiting in improper behavior. Your interference without knowing history is unwelcome. I am resetting the block for 48 hours as a trade-off. Please read the rules about blocking/blocking wars and don't do it. mikka (t) 20:30, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Well I didn't expect you to agree since you just used always the "argument of force". You never tried to be more flexible, I don't agree to be blocked for another 48 h. You're hating me or what? Bonaparte talk 20:33, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

And how many times and how many users told you also to block node, for eacalating punishment for persisiting in improper behavior. You asked for proofs and when I presented you, what did you done? Nothing. You erased my proofs. If you have some issues there are other methods except for blocking. Bonaparte talk 20:35, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Calm down, mate!

You really need to chill out, my friend. I know others are adding contentious content, I suspect it is as you say against consensus, but you know Mikka has an itchy trigger finger and you know that whoever is behaving badly it's always you who ends up blocked. Use the Talk pages, martial your arguments clearly and concisely, keep the passion to a minimum. Beware of the WP:TIGERS! Happy Christmas, Just zis Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] AfD? 21:39, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I will Guy, thanks for your message! Happy Christmas to you too Guy! :) You made me happy -- Bonaparte talk 21:50, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Are my edits so passionate? Bonaparte talk 21:52, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Sometimes, yes. And your comments definitely. Nothing wrong with that, as long as you temper your passion with prudence :-) - Just zis Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] AfD? 22:27, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I will be honest with you. I didn't realized this :-) Bonaparte talk 09:22, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Romanian diaspora dispute

Ai vreo idee ce am putea face in cazul disputei de la Diaspora Romaneasca? Nu cred nici o cifra pusa acolo! Ar trebui sa ii oprim cumva. Daca shtii ce am putea sa facem, zimi te rog. NorbertArthur 26 December 2005

Prin negocieri. Numai asa merge. Bonaparte talk 07:12, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Link: http://www.freedomhouse.org/research/nitransit/2003/moldova2003.pdf

An estimated one million of people from Moldova—or half the country’s workforce and potential voters—have migrated to Portugal, Spain, Italy, Romania, Russia, and other countries in search of better jobs. In Italy alone, there are over 200,000 people of Moldova.

Voi sunteti fraieri. Voi vreti sa aratati ca multi romani sunt in diaspora. De ce? Cu cat mai multi romani in Romania, cu atata mai bine. --Anittas 04:35, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Da, aici agreez 100% cu Anittas. Nu ştiu dece este aşa mare lucru să fie mulţi români în diaspora... acesta este un lucru rău în părerea mea, nu unul de laudă!

Ronline ✉ 07:07, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Doar am sustinut estimarile oficiale. Ele sustin ca sunt peste 10,000,000 de romani in afara granitelor. Atata tot. Bonaparte talk 07:12, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Antidote and User:Zordrac/Poetlister

I note that you are involved in the above RfC. Please see my sub page for evidence of the entirety of the dispute and related issues. Zordrac (talk) Wishy Washy Darwikinian Eventualist 12:49, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

OK thanks, I will do it when I will be unblocked. Tomorrow. Bonaparte talk 12:51, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

România va participa la forţa de reacţie rapidă a UE [[1]]

România, Bulgaria, Grecia şi Republica Cipru au convenit să constituie un „grup de luptă“ ce va face parte din forţa de reacţie rapidă a Uniunii Europene care va interveni în situaţii de criză în diferite puncte de pe glob. Decizia a fost adoptată luni, la reuniunea miniştrilor apărării din statele membre ale Uniunii Europene desfăşurată la Bruxelles, iar grupul de luptă va fi unul dintre cele aproximativ 20 similare la nivelul UE.

Basescu

I think you noticed that I did not say "the Moldovan people" but "the people of Moldova"-Basescu [[2]]

http://www.freedomhouse.org/research/nitransit/2003/moldova2003.pdf

http://www.freedomhouse.org/research/nitransit/2004/moldova2004.pdf

http://www.freedomhouse.org/research/nitransit/2005/moldova2005.pdf