Talk:Kitsch
This seems like more of a dictionary entry than an encyclopedia article, and I can't see how it can develop into a good one. --Robert Merkel 13:12 Oct 2, 2002 (UTC)
Thanks for the comment, Robert. I'm pretty sure Kitsch becomes a lengthy article, since #no decent dictionary definition can give anyone a clue what it is #without plenty of examples, it's meaningless, #it's a cultural/artistic phenomenon, not just a word.
When this becomes a full-size article, it should include:
Types of Kitsch
...
Examples
...
Kitsch Cultural Phenomena (by country)
...
Links to Kitsch Art, Commentary, and Fan Clubs
...
Also, For those trying to do a better job on defining Kitsch, (or myself when I have some time) I've found some good thoughts here at http://clover.slavic.pitt.edu/~djb/aatseel/1999/abstract-28.html
My excerpt:
- (kitsch is) art or literature of a cheap, garish, or sentimental
nature, while allowing that kitsch may be utilized in a work of art without having to relegate that work to the status of "bad art" or "anti-art."
- Second, I will treat kitsch in its aesthetic context only, and
largely ignore the socio-historical question (with its attendant and important questions of cultural relativism, elitism, imperialism, etc). Finally, I will propose a definition of kitsch specifically for the written work of art. I suggest that kitsch as a literary device is a function of irony. Often it is sentimentalism or mawkishness put to use by the narrator, whose ironic tone is a signal to the reader to "read this as kitsch." In the absence of an ironic narrator or subtext, the sentimentalism; or mawkishness (the kitsch as such) stands. This may be called "unmitigated kitsch." In an effort to further elaborate this kitsch-irony interaction, I will draw on the categories of irony that Wayne Booth sets out in his Rhetoric of Irony, namely his threefold criteria of stable/unstable, local/universal, and overt/covert. If kitsch and irony are as closely related as I postulate, then it will be possible and productive to apply these categories of irony to kitsch.
I promise, if nobody else does, to use this stuff and more to make a worthy article out of Kitsch. Steve Rapaport
OK, I'm glad you intend to turn this into a decent article. A couple of points:
- Wikipedia isn't the place for original research (so if you are
presenting your own new theories of kitsch, this isn't the place to introduce the world to them).
- Can you achieve a neutral point of view discussion of kitsch?
I've no doubt you can, but I think these are important things to keep in mind as you write the article. --Robert Merkel