Jump to content

User talk:Titoxd

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Fenice (talk | contribs) at 18:05, 1 January 2006 (→Hapy New Year). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome to my Talk Page!

Communication

IRC

Please post new messages to the bottom of my talk page. Please use headlines when starting new talk topics. Thank you.
My time zone is GMT -7:00. Please have that in mind if leaving time-sensitive comments.

Archived every 50 sub-headings:
Archive 1 (July 7, 2005 to October 8, 2005)
Archive 2 (October 9, 2005 to October 22, 2005)
Archive 3 (October 23, 2005 to November 5, 2005)
Archive 4 (November 6, 2005 to November 19, 2005)
Archive 5 (November 20, 2005 to December 7, 2005)
Archive 6 (December 8, 2005 to December 18, 2005)
Archive 7 (December 19, 2005 to December 29, 2005)
Archive 8 (December 29, 2005 to January 8, 2006)
Archive 9 (January 8, 2006 to January 29, 2006)
Archive 10 (January 29, 2006 to February 11, 2006)
Archive 11 (February 11, 2006 to March 3, 2006)
Archive 12 (March 4, 2006 to April 2, 2006)
Archive 13 (April 2, 2006 to April 22, 2006)
Archive 14 (April 23, 2006 to May 11, 2006)
Archive 15 (May 12, 2006 to June 10, 2006)
Archive 16 (June 10, 2006 to July 4, 2006)
Archive 17 (July 4, 2006 to July 31, 2006)
Archive 18 (July 31, 2006 to September 14, 2006)
Archive 19 (September 15, 2006 to November 11, 2006)
Archive 20 (November 11, 2006 to December 23, 2006)
Archive 21 (December 24, 2006 to February 24, 2007)
Archive 22 (February 24, 2007 to April 12, 2007)
Archive 23 (April 12, 2007 to July 10, 2007)
Archive 24 (July 11, 2007 to November 12, 2007)
Archive 25 (November 13, 2007 to March 3, 2008)
Archive 26 (March 9, 2008 to June 21, 2008)
Archive 27 (June 28, 2008 to September 30, 2008)
Archive 28 (October 1, 2008 to June 23, 2009)
Archive 29 (June 27, 2009 to July 2, 2010)
Archive 30 (July 3, 2010 to June 9, 2011)
Archive 31 (June 10, 2011 to December 30, 2012)
Archive 32 (January 1, 2013 to January 7, 2016)
Archive 33 (January 8, 2016 to March 18, 2020)

Wikipedia:Wikipedia DVD/Temp

Although you deleted Wikipedia:Wikipedia DVD, you forgot the old temp page (a redirect) at Wikipedia:Wikipedia DVD/Temp. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 05:45, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Titoxd(?!? - did you read this?) 05:46, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
A few more things left over, like Wikipedia DVD/Temp and Wikipedia DVD. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 05:50, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
All of those are now redlinks. Titoxd(?!? - did you read this?) 05:52, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Edit Counter

Ah, and here I was about to reply to your last version. :-) Good work! Here's my thoughts on 3.10 (I'll try 3.20 in a minute...): The GUI is pretty nice, and it's great that you can read and merge from more than one htm file. However, the GUI needs some work - for instance, no "exit" button (only the X and cancel), and an output besides System.out would be nice. If you haven't changed some of those things in 3.20, I'll see what I can do. Let me get back to you after I try out 3.2. Thanks a lot! Flcelloguy (A note?) 16:13, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

3.20 looks good! I especially like the "New query" and outputs. I'll see if I can add some buttons (i.e. "Done", etc.). Right now, I've spent some time with the edit summary - it's working pretty well, except that the editing sections with or without edit summaries is a bit of a pain. I need some more time with that and I'll work on it later tonight and later this week. Anyways, I was thinking it's time to move to project off of user subpages and move it to a subpage of WP:TOOLS (like the popups), merge the two pages, and call it "Statistics Tool" or something like that, created by Flcelloguy and Titoxd. What do you think? Thanks! Flcelloguy (A note?) 17:14, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Wow, you sure get a lot of messages in one day. :-) I'll start merging the two pages and moving it, and while I like that name, I'll see if I can improve on it. :-) Thanks! Flcelloguy (A note?) 21:35, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
The output of that page looks interesting. I'm sure we could design a GUI that could produce a pie chart of percent breakdown by namespace - I remember I did something like this last year, but I'll have to dig it up from old files. :-) The number of distinct pages edited looks to be a bit harder to do - we would have to keep track of each distinct page edited as another variable, and then check each page to see if it matched. I'm getting some progress done on the edit summary, but I still need some time. It works right now except that the section edits can't be properly parsed. Once the program identifies it as section editing, I'm having a bit of trouble with the unicode arrow, but I should figure it out in the coming days. Thanks! Flcelloguy (A note?) 15:58, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

IRC

Hello there, hope you are well. Today I was able to register my nickname, FireFox, on IRC which I haven't been able to do in the past. I have been told you have the ability to raise access levels, so if you wouldn't mind, and if it isn't against any policy, could you please raise my access level to 11 (which is what I've been told most admins have) or higher on irc://irc.freenode.net/wikipedia-en-vandalism - Thanks, FireFox 20:02, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I echo that sentiment, hope you are well. I just registered my nickname too! It's all just a little to hetic. I'm like a lost puppy in there :-D so I'm just observing. Could you explain how it all works? Thanks KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 20:27, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for that ;D Alf melmac (aka "a c*ck") 20:22, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

PLEASE HELP ME

Hi. I am the user user:Bucephalus. I was trying to make navigation popups work for me but I am inept. I edited (= broke) my monobook page and now I can't access it to change back because I have broken that user name. The page is protected, so only me (but my user name is broken) and admins can fix. Please could revert this page:

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Bucephalus/monobook.js&action=history

to the 30th march version. Sorry. I really am this stupid. --Bucephalus1 20:49, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for reverting vandalism on my userpage!
FireFox 21:17, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Vandal Blocking

(I'm posting this so you have it written down for your scrapbook someday... :)

17:07, December 19, 2005 Titoxd blocked "User:(*)Stars(*)" with an expiry time of indefinite (don't you have something better to do than vandalize?)
17:09, December 19, 2005 Titoxd blocked "User:No I don't actually" with an expiry time of indefinite (good, then go play somewhere)

Nice job, Tixoxd...I was laughing out loud as I watched this progress. Nice vandal blocking, by the way!--ViolinGirl♪ 22:25, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I try to help with the vandal whacking, but I need to read up about it...there isn't much non-admins can do, right? Before that, though, it looks like I need to learn how to make headers. I can just see you clicking on the history..."Where IS that "new message"? ha ha! Sorry about that!--ViolinGirl♪ 23:40, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

PS Beethoven's Symphony No. WHAT???!

Well, I was just kidding about learning how to make headers...sorry for not making that clear...I did fix it, anyway, though...oh, yeah, and String Quartet...I must be very ignorant...Beethoven didn't write 131 SQ's, did he? And thanks, I'll keep you in mind if I need help sometime...For now, ViolinGirl♪ 00:11, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Whew, you scared me! I was thinking, "Beethoven isn't THAT old, is he?!!" LOL--ViolinGirl♪ 00:18, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you so much! I remember reading that somewhere, but it will be helpful having it on my talk page for a while so I can learn how. So even though I can't block people, I can at least now revert changes...(at least, as long as I remember how!) Thanks again!--ViolinGirl♪ 00:38, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, I will take you up on the offer of blocking vandals for me, if I need it. Maybe someday I will consider becoming an administrator. Thanks again for everything today. Have a nice rest-of-the-day!--ViolinGirl♪ 01:15, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reverting my user page.

Subject line says all. Dpbsmith (talk) 02:23, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou

Thanks for blocking Ropo. --Alexs letterbox 02:35, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Learning the ropos

Heh. That's what I call tag teaming :) nice work. Radiant_>|< 02:39, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]


Holocaust Denial

Vandal is back with new IP, want to protect the page and block offenders? -- Jbamb 05:48, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks but wasn't the tag his addition to the page? -- Jbamb 05:50, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Peer review

The remainder of the Big Four: (in order of readiness) Rita, Wilma, and Katrina. 2005AHS eventually. Right now, Rita first, that article's close. Then Wilma. Then I want 2004AHS to be renominated. Ivan needs to be renominatated. Then we should look at the other articles for 2004 storm and see if any have and hope of being an FA. Ivan should be desiganted a good article very soon. Rita too. Then we'll go from there. Thoughts? -- Hurricane Eric - my dropsonde - archive 05:54, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

User:Titoxd'

I was looking through the user creation log and found User:Titoxd' (note the apostrophe at the end of the name). If this is an imposter, you might want to block him/her. -- Daverocks 07:26, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

PS No sweat Titoxd, that was the impostor you saw in the IRC channel while eating, blocked by Curps. NSLE (T+C+CVU) 07:32, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

ROAK...thank you so much!

Woot! I finish my Wikipediating, turn in for the night. Next morning, I go to my userpage, behold! I'm PURPLE!!! Thank you SO MUCH for your kind act!--ViolinGirl♪

Hey, Tito...that would be AWESOME if you could do it to my talk page...if you have time! I just realized about the color scheme...how thoughtful! So yeah, if you have time...thanks!!!!--ViolinGirl♪ 23:02, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Woo hoo! Messages...beautiful, thanks so much!--ViolinGirl♪ 23:10, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Vandal complaint

What? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.42.7.170 (talk • contribs) 20:55, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Calling it as I see it boss, sorry if your kilt is all messed up. I'll cease. I thought Wiki was open for any edits.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.42.7.170 (talk • contribs) 21:42, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki markup for headings

You recently (03:26, 19 December 2005) removed spaces from the markup for headings in the list of environment topics, but spaces are shown in the examples at Wikipedia:How to edit a page#Examples. Wavelength 21:09, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

That shouldn't be an issue with the MediaWiki software, but I'll bring it up at WP:AWB, which is what I was using when I did it. Titoxd(?!? - help us) 21:11, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

{{Unimage}}

I have rewitten {{Unimage}} so it merely asserts copyright ownership, and isn't an ambigious license tag. Please take a look at the rewrite, and at my comments at WP:TFD#Unimage, and consider whether you wish to modifiy your comments. DES (talk) 23:38, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your support in the numismatic poll.

Thank you for your support in the numismatic poll. As I am a very serious numismatist, I have always started coin & banknote denominations with a capital letter. See Cypriot Pound as an example, or my article Coins of Cyprus. - (Aidan Work 01:37, 21 December 2005 (UTC))[reply]

malo's RfA

Thank you!
Thank you!
Titoxd, thanks for your support on my RFA. I was rather suprised at the overwhelming support I received. Thank you for your confidence in me. I hope that I'll live up to your expectations in the future as well. -- malo (tlk) (cntrbtns) 05:06, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Userpage Vandalism

Hi Titoxd,

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my userpage! :)

- Cheers, Mailer Diablo 20:10, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

User:Bobby1005

Bobby edited your commnets to his talk page. I reverte dthem and explained tha such was considered rude. You may wish to watch this one, as he appears to be a vandal, only finally acquiring a user name. - CobaltBlueTony 20:33, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

User:Zordrac/Fortuneloungegroup

Please can you let me know what you think of the neutrality of the article. Also can you advise me what to do with links that aren't making it through the spam filter. Ironically, somewhat, it is in relation to proving that they weren't spamming anyone lol. Sorry, there's a lot of irony there, since their current main claim to fame is that they may soon be closed down forever due to spam abuse. But they are the biggest online casino in the world, which is another claim to fame. Its a current event too. They were shut down *YESTERDAY* for spam abuse - AFAIK the first ever online casino to be shut down for spam abuse, and for this to happen to the biggest one in the world is a major news story. Let me know what you think. Zordrac (talk) Wishy Washy Darwikinian Eventualist 20:42, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Why shouldn't there be an awards section? I had such things for rap stars like ie.Merge. What is the difference? These are official awards given to the best online casino in the world. It demonstrates the high prestige that this casino has (or had, as the case may be). They are referenced in all other articles about the group. Note words such as "It is surprising that a group as well reputed as Fortune Lounge Group could have been engaged in spam" (sic). The awards are official, they are not just some web site or something. Note that all 3 groups that gave them awards have been in the forefront of prosecuting them for spam. Quite relevant. Zordrac (talk) Wishy Washy Darwikinian Eventualist 20:58, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm. If you saw how much I cut out of the "awards" page, you'd see that these ones ARE the only non-advertisement ones :). I was tempted to link straight to the awards, but was wary of doing so. Oh, and as I said before, what do I do with the 2 important links not being displayable due to Wikipedia's anti-spam software forbidding them? They were the 2 bits that prove their innocence. Seems a bit unfair that they aren't allowed to prove their innocence. Not very neutral then. Zordrac (talk) Wishy Washy Darwikinian Eventualist 21:02, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

They're not just not clickable - it won't even let me type them in with nowiki. I have to have spaces, thus giving the wrong web address. So what do I do? Zordrac (talk) Wishy Washy Darwikinian Eventualist 21:10, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Stop vandalizing my talk!

Enough said! Stop removing my messages and vandalizing my page!!!

It's a legitamite question dude. Stop it!

How about this?

Changed the message bar to just say (diff) - can't get more concise than that, eh? BDAbramson T 00:37, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Looks quite good. :) Titoxd(?!? - help us) 01:12, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The Movement

What do you think of the movement? Reply here. Thanks. --Kin Khan 02:57, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

My RFA

Hey Titoxd! Thanks for your support on my RfA. The final outcome was an unanimous (45/0/0), so I am now an administrator. If you need help, or have a question, please don't hesitate to let me know! Again, thanks! :D --Eliezer | £€åV€ m€ å m€§§åg€ 03:18, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Way to go on reverting my vandalism, dude

You so listened, you like totally rawk! --205.188.116.5 05:18, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

At least you actually act when you see my vandalism accouncements, unlike that Ichiro guy with his reverting program. Hey, do you know Curps well or something, because he seems to quickly revert all of the vandalism that I announce on pages you revert? --152.163.100.5 06:30, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection

When you semi-protect a page, use {{sprotected}}. Also note that semi-protection isn't meant to be on full-time. Ral315 (talk) 07:18, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I know, I just was doing 10 things at the same time, and I was about to tag the page with {{sprotected}} when you did it. You beat me to it. Titoxd(?!? - help us) 07:19, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

WP:PP#Semi-protection

Howdy, mate. Could you add GWB to here, as you're the protecting admin? If any others are semi'd as yet, those could go on too. Blackcap (talk) (vandalfighters, take a look) 08:11, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind, Woohookitty's just done it for ya. Blackcap (talk) (vandalfighters, take a look) 08:14, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas

I'm not expecting to be online as much over the next few days so...

User:Francs2000/Christmas

-- Francs2000 09:25, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

How long should an article be semi-protected?

I've raised this question here, as now it's actually real and happening I expect more people will want to comment. Dan100 (Talk) 14:58, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Status messages

I am here to tell you I am going to be using your groovy status messages. FireFox 17:33, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas

I would like to wish you and your family a Merry Christmas and all the best for the New Year. Guettarda 18:47, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanx for the notice!

That (User:68-39-174-238)'s the 3rd impostor I've had ;D! 12.75.98.167 22:09, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Status Messages Question

Hello Titoxd. I saw your cool status messages, but I had a question. Is there an automated way to update the time/date stamp whenever you login or make an edit or must you manually change the date with a ~~~~~ command? --R6MaY89 23:53, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

UNITED cRACKING fORCE

Hi there. Can you please help out with the UNITED cRACKING fORCE article, there is some guy who is creating fake accounts to make edits, one of which have already been blocked (User:Raul656) for impersonating an administrator. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 05:37, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Gamerstrike

hi, why did you remove the speedy tag from this article? i couldnt find anything indicating notability in there. can i put nn-club tag back? Zzzzz 16:51, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Crimbo!

Have a Proper and Merry Crimbo. File:Pressie.gif, in fact here is a pressie from the Doctor to you. Ho. Ho. Ho! File:Unclecrimbo.gif Dr. McCrimbo 22:39, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the cheer! Ho. Ho. Ho! File:Unclecrimbo.gif Dr. McCrimbo 22:41, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Happy holidays!

File:CandyCane.JPG
A candy cane for you!

Hi, Titoxd! I hope you have an enjoyable and relaxing winter break. :) Take care, Sango123 (talk) 00:21, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion

Please stop vandalizing; I will continue to revert. --SPUI (talk | don't use sorted stub templates!) 02:04, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This MFD you closed has been reopened, please visit it, and the associated page history: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Stub_types_for_deletion&action=historyxaosflux Talk/CVU 03:04, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Reverting Dallas Edits

I'd discussed removing all that content with RJN.. is there a reason it was reverted to its previous state? There are already pages that have all that information on it and it only takes up space on the Dallas page. If there are other articles to deal with neighborhoods, there shouldn't be subsections with possibly interfering information in the main article. drumguy8800 - speak? 04:11, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas!!

MERRY CHRISTMAS, Titoxd! Hope it's a wonderful one! (happy New Year, too!)--ViolinGirl♪ 15:25, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]


Merry Christmas!!

MERRY CHRISTMAS, Titoxd! A well deserved pressy!--Santa on Sleigh 22:01, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

AfD closing question

Ahoy! I would like you to reconsidder the AfD here: Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/SourceryForge. There were five delete votes, two keep. One of those keeps was conditional, the other had a rationale of "fun name." There was an additional delete vote stricken, more because of my admittedly half-assed nomination then the veracity of the article - I illicited further comment from that user but was ignored. I won't do a full DRV or relist or anything here, just asking for a reconsideration. Thanks for your time! --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 08:59, 27 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Esparenza Elections: Question

Moved to the statement/questions page, as it is more appropriate there. Titoxd(?!? - help us) 23:26, 27 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Help?

Hey, Tito, I was working on CryptoDerk's Vandal Fighter program today, and I noticed I was on the temp blacklist, and also, that none of my contribs were being listed in my contrib list. Am I on a temp. block that I can't see or something? I don't think I did anything wrong, except I added {{d}} to an article by User:Ron becker, who had been causing trouble. Hope I'm not in trouble...I didn't mean to do anything wrong...--ViolinGirl♪ 23:52, 27 December 2005 (UTC) PS I posted this on Banes userpage, but I don't think he's on...[reply]

Thanks a lot! I was a little worried! Thank you!--ViolinGirl♪ 23:57, 27 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, I didn't think so, because you'd get a message, right? Thanks again for being there (literally, online!) for me!--ViolinGirl♪ 23:59, 27 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Mfd top

Oh, I was unaware of that. I must say I find the difference between {{vt}} and {{mt}} extremely trivial, why exactly does it need two templates? Radiant_>|< 00:06, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Birthdays

Ack! I won't be 39 for another thirty-six minutes here in Eastern Standard Time! (thanks anyway) ℬastique▼parℓer♥voir♑ 04:24, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

RfA thanks from Deathphoenix

Hi Titoxd Wacko Phoenix,

I just wanted to thank you for supporting me in my RfA. To tell you the truth, I was surprised by all the support I've gotten. I never saw myself as more than an occasional Wiki-hobbyist.

My wife sends her curses, as Wikipedia will likely suck up more of my time. She jokingly (I think) said she was tempted to log on to Wikipedia just to vote Oppose and let everyone know that she didn't want her husband to be an admin.

It means a great deal to me to get a cliché vote from you. I'll make sure your trust in me is founded. --Deathphoenix 14:49, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thank you for vigilantly reverting vandalism on my talk page. It's much appreciated. Cookie? :)

-- Hinotori(talk)|(ctrb) 00:39, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Award

For your help and expertese in helping me make Flag of Mexico into one of the best articles on WP, I give you this Barnstar. Gracias, mi amigo. Zach (Smack Back) 04:33, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Counseling... :)

Thank you for your terrific advice and for the links and stuff. Recently I've been getting more involved with the CDVF program, and also a little bit of RfA and AfD...so I guess I'm on the right track. I definitely agree with what you said. Your advice was very much appreciated...between you, User:Banes, and Sango, I have an excellent group of mentors. I can't thank you enough. I'll be working where you suggested. I agree, the user_talk page edits could go against me...but I'm working on a few of my own articles right now, so...we'll see. Thanks again!--ViolinGirl♪ 12:54, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

AWB

Hi, there is an option in the menu to mark all edits as minor, but just clicking the minor edit tickbox in the browser to do a one occasionally won't do any harm. Martin 21:55, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Color schemes

All right. Don't tell me, but they probably kept 1 or 2 of those stupid Easter egg colors. "...strong hint noted." ?? I'm stupid, could you enlighten me?? :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by E. Brown (talk • contribs) 00:07, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, oops, I did forget to sign the above comment, sorry. I do want to be an admin one day, mainly because I want to help and feel I can add a lot of value. I'm also tired of feeling helpless every time I come across a prolific vandal that has been warned several times but gone unblocked. And many other users have been very supportive of me. But I'm still working on the feedback given to me by my last RFA. Again, I do want to be an admin one day, but that's not the reason I made that comment. I was merely pointing out that I felt kind of weird speaking so authoritatively and thinking so big among a group I wasn't a part of. I felt kind of alone, you know, like a visiting-team member in the home team's locker room. It was just me being a worry wart again. (And this is me talking too much again ;) ) -- Hurricane Eric - my dropsonde - archive 00:23, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, maybe I can stop fretting now (it runs in the family) :). -- Hurricane Eric - my dropsonde - archive 00:39, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Will do. Thanks again. Hurricane Eric - my dropsonde - archive 00:43, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Congradulations!

You have been chosen by Esperenza to participate in the Advisory Council. As a member of the election staff, I wish you good luck.

...Make Wikipedia prosper with your leadership...


Wikizach 00:54, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I'm waiting for the rest of our volunteers to report back before certifying the results. The announcement above by Wikizach was a little bit premature, but I'm sure the results now are correct anyways. More on this once the results are certified. Thanks! Flcelloguy (A note?) 01:29, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I've replied on the talk page and on the mailing list. Thanks! Flcelloguy (A note?) 02:05, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Sure, and thanks! I apologize for any confusion this has caused. Flcelloguy (A note?) 02:11, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Another Vandal

Hi there Tito. Was wondering if you could do the honors in blocking this vandal, Ham Kazerooni, another one of the vandals from earlier today. Thanks for all your help. SWD316 talk to me 04:35, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Tito. SWD316 talk to me 04:41, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
If I could, can I just start a list of socks he creates here so you can block them, if you don't want me too thats fine but your the only one I know who is here right now to deal with him, so can I or do you want me to list it somewhere else? SWD316 talk to me 04:54, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Mister Marbles
I posted it at WP:AIV like you suggested. Thanks for all your help today in putting up with me. :-) SWD316 talk to me 05:07, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Got your message

Thanks for the advise, and this message is to you, the other messages were not to you, nor your business, so get a grip and mind your own business. Thank-You Order of the phoenix 06:03, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

open proxies

Actually, it was User:Fvw who had some code for checking open proxies, but he just ran it in batch mode, not in response to each IP that got blocked. However, I was under the impression that the developers actually put in code for this behind the scenes and were running it at one time, but got some ISP complaints and stopped. However, it could presumably be revived, and at developer level the code would undoubtedly have access to the underlying IPs of blocked registered accounts as well as blocked anonymous IPs. So that's probably the thing to pursue. I recall this being discussed with Brion or Tim Starling but don't recall the outcome... maybe it was left up in the air. -- Curps 07:00, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Negroponte edits

I'm the one who edited the John Negroponte page that you reverted. I stopped cycling the edits once I realized that you are an Admin. Nevertheless, I believe that if you take your role seriously, you should take a hard look at that page and take action on your own. I have absolutely no axe to grind in this one, and don't know Negroponte from Adam. On the other hand, as a fair-minded, rational person, seeing an article that consists virtually COMPLETELY of partisan attacks (and no, just footnoting someone else's attack doesn't make it 'verifiable') makes a mockery of Wikipedia's 'peer reviewing'. If you look through the history of that page you will see quite a few questions about the NPOV issue, and calls for peer reviews. Unfortunately, the only people spending the time to write (surprise, surprise) are the partisans. What I did in the large edit that you reverted was simply to exise the attacks (which were COMPLETELY unbalanced. By no conceivable stretch of the imagination could they be considered remotely neutral.) What I left were purely the objective, verifiable facts, along with the dozens of links to the attack pages that say the same thing as the attack verbiage in the article.

If you really want to help Wikipedia, take a serious read of that article, and consider it from the perspective of a truly objective academic. If you were a university professor, and some student handed in a paper that relied primarily on that "wisdom of crowds" Wikipedia entry, you would give him or her an F. I would have no problem with that 1500 word hatchet job if it were balanced with a 1500 word supporting piece. But it isn't, so where is the neutral point of view? As a result, what is a fair-minded, NON-partisan Wikipedian supposed to do? I'm neither a fan nor a critic of Negroponte. As I said, I don't know him at all, or even much about him. But I do know a pure attack screed when I read one, and I was simply trying to help keep Wikipedia neutral and useful. So I ask you: if I'm not enough of an expert to quote chapter and verse in praise of Negroponte, but I'm reasonable to know that the existing entry is clearly UNreasonable, what am I supposed to do? Leave it so some impressionable elementary school kid researching a term paper swallows all that stuff without hearing any objective facts? I guess that under the concept of 'incremental revision' you were right to revert my wholesale edit, but now that you have stepped in, I think it is incumbent on you to carefully review that whole article you just replaced and determine whether it is, indeed, written with a NPOV. And if you don't believe it is, then YOU edit it in a way that would be acceptable to the Wikipedia community.

Images

It's actually not hardcoded anywhere as its not really egregious. It is considered good style to right-align images at the beginning of a section as it becomes easier for the eye to read the text. Most of the top ten-fifteen people on this list avoid the left-alignment at the beginning, or do away with it completely. Regards, =Nichalp «Talk»= 08:05, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Just wanted to give you a heads-up regarding images and works published by the Mexican government. These weren't in the public domain as per the "Ley Federal del Derecho de Autor" as it was written before July 23, 2003. Even with the current rendition of the law, it isn't entirely clear what is the copyright status of works by the government. This in relation to this image in commons and any others you may have seen around or uploaded yourself. Thank you. -- Rune Welsh | ταλκ | Esperanza 18:43, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I point you to this edition of the law, in article 29. That article was modified to remove the explicit reference to the Mexican government and the change was effective on July 23, 2003. I was hoping the Diario Oficial of that day would offer any commentary on the issue, but I was found wanting.
I'd remove the image just to be on the safe side, unless you have the image's exact date and source. The fact that you've seen the image floating around campaign websites is not too encouraging either. Given the lack of culture in Mexico regarding copyright law, they might as well be in violation of somebody's copyright.
My lawyer says that without any explicit reference the copyright situation of works produced after that date would have to be defined by the courts now. In any case, we currently have a "Ley de Transparencia" request on the matter.
Let me know if you have any questions. Congrats for your successful candidacy in the Esperanza elections! -- Rune Welsh | ταλκ | Esperanza 22:15, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Advisory Council meeting

First, let me congratulate you on becaoming a member of the new Advisory Council. I would like to arrange a meeting with the Advisory Council in IRC either on Saturday or Sunday and wondered when it would be possible (taking time zones into account). Please could you respond on my talk page as soon as possible. Thank you. --Celestianpower háblame 20:59, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats!

Congratulations, Tito! :D Best wishes, Sango123 (talk) 21:25, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
File:Cake.JPG
Some vegan cakes to congratulate you on winning the Esperanza council election! ➨ ❝REDVERS❞

Congratulations

Congratulations on winning the Esperanza council election.--Dakota ~ ε 22:05, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats :) - hope you stick around! WhiteNight T | @ | C 00:38, 31 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats to you and yours, and thanks for stickin' around (I don't hope, I beg, that you stay around for a good long while)! -Mysekurity(have you seen this?) 00:49, 31 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, and you're very welcome! I know you'll do a great job. --King of All the Franks 01:07, 31 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

AWB?

Are you sure that AWB thing is cleaning up correctly? Sections using the "new section" tool (like this one) create titles that have a space between the ==s and the words, but the AWB thing removes them. --AySz88^-^ 22:17, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. :) And congrats on that election. :) --AySz88^-^ 14:56, 31 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Esperanza election

Thank you for your support in the Esperanza Election. I was unsuccessful in the end of the election but I would like to thank you for having confidence in me to be a future admin general/ advisory council member. SWD316 talk to me 23:15, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Esperanza Election

No, thank you! I look forward to working with you on the Advisory Council. karmafist 00:49, 31 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations

Congratulations on your success in the election! the wub "?!" 00:59, 31 December 2005 (UTC) P.S. I think you might want to update the wikistress meter on your user page :-)[reply]

Thanks

Hello Titoxd,

I wish to thank you for your vote on my RfA. It has passed with a final tally of 59/0/0. If I can ever help with anything or if you have any comments about my actions as an admin, please let me know! KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 04:15, 31 December 2005 (UTC) [reply]

yay! more newbie questions. (aren't you glad you're in esperanza?)

Hey Tito! Hope you had a good Christmas. I don't know if you enjoy stopping the vandals but you were very helpful to me last time so I have another question for you. I found another one! 202.63.168.43 has done 3 blankings. Should I skip to a substtest 2a? maybe a 3? It seems like letting them vandalize like 10 times and hoping wikipedians aren't too lazy to warn them 4 times before we do anything is not very efficient. Is this up to the admins or is there a strict policy governing this? What do you think?

Also, someone blanked my comment on a talk page and several things have been added since then. Would reverting it take away the recent legitimate things? What do I do in this situation?

thanks tito!

--Victoria h 08:55, 31 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Esperanza Elections

Titoxd

Thanks for voting for me at the Esperanza Elections.

I've made my way into the Advisory Committee, so if you ever need any help or have any queries about the stuff we do, please do not hesitate to ask me. Thanks again, FireFox 11:51, 31 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
P.S. Thanks for doing that edit count thing :) FireFox 12:02, 31 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Congratulations, and I look forward to working with you! Flcelloguy (A note?) 16:07, 31 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hapy New Year

For last year's words belong to last year's language
And next year's words await another voice.
And to make an end is to make a beginning.
T.S. Eliot, "Little Gidding"
Happy New Year! ≈ jossi ≈ t • @ 20:24, 31 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]


Inverse Spanish Translation
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Titoxd&oldid=33496619"