Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/History of saffron
A peer review here saw no comments. All the material here was once part of Saffron when it passed through FAC — that is likely why. But at 91 kb when it became FA, Saffron was begging to be split up, lest it be put up as a WP:FARC. Even this daughter article is 36 kb. Saravask 20:55, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
- Not really an objection, but IMHO it could use a bit more tweaking with the flow of the article WhiteNight T | @ | C 21:09, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
- Ah. I'll withdraw this momentarily and leave it in peer review for another two weeks. I hope someone will comment there on flow specifics. You are invited to elaborate on your comments there as well. Thanks.