Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/National Anti-Vaccination League
This isn't really an article, and doesn't have any useful information to be organized CDN99 15:43, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
- Googling yields 267 hits; it's a defunct group --CDN99 13:36, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
- Keep and Expand to contain some slightly more useful information Jcuk 19:05, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
- Please keep; it's an important lesson to remember that such a group existed and had support (anon)
- Keep Important historical organisation, and seeing as all vaccination pages are biased and vaccination criticism gets deleted off Wiki eg Lily Loat, --attempts Viera Scheibner, Vaccination critics, there needs to be a source of present day anti-vaccination people, seeing as Vaccination critics looks to be going. And since my research is vaccination I would appreciate it if other editors didn't try to delete my work. john 17:44, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
- This isn't a present-day organization. John's "research" is described here, as well as his numerous articles created to support his criticism of vaccines. --CDN99 18:42, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
- Keep I have no sympathy for the anti-vax position, but this contains valuable information for those of us who attempt to counteract the damaging influence of anti-vax fanatics like John (whaleto).
- History needs to be preserved. Unless we understand our history, we will be doomed to repeat it. Even the rantings of misinformed anti-vaxers should sometimes be preserved. They just need to be labeled for what they are: rants, misinformation, dangerous, prejudiced, one-sided, etc.
- Wikipedia needs to be more than an ordinary encyclopedia, which includes the concept of being a relatively unlimited source of information. Bytes fill less than paper.....;.) -- Fyslee 21:21, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
- keep: Noteworthy. Ombudsman 21:38, 6 January 2006 (UTC)