Jump to content

Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections January 2006/Vote/Jayjg

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Fred Bauder (talk | contribs) at 03:06, 9 January 2006 (Support). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

I'm Jayjg. I joined Wikipedia on June 15, 2004, was made an administrator on September 13, 2004, and in July of 2005 Jimmy Wales appointed me to the Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee. I'm a pretty active Wikipedia editor, having made over 30,000 edits.

I believe the Arbitration Committee is an unfortunate, but necessary, last step in Wikipedia's dispute resolution process. In the past I've felt and raised concerns about the effectiveness of all of the formal dispute resolution mechanisms (including mediation, RfC, and RfAr). RfAr in particular has suffered from slowness (mostly related, I believe, to having far too many inactive members), and from decisions that tended to be too narrow to be effective (e.g. prescribing remedies on one specific article, when the issue is an editor's behaviour in general). I think it's important for Arbitrators to keep in mind that our primary and ultimate goal here is to create a great encyclopedia.

I have found the Arbitration process itself quite interesting, but extremely time consuming; reading through the evidence on a single case can take many hours. I've been actively involved in almost all cases started after my appointment to the committee; in addition to regular involvement in votes on whether to accept or reject case, and regular contributions to the Arbitration Committee mail-list, I've also worked on the Skyring, Alfrem, Gabrielsimon, Ed Poor, AI, Coolcat, Davenbelle and Stereotek, Rktect, Rainbowwarrior1977, DotSix, Keetowah, Onefortyone, BigDaddy777, Everyking 3, Regarding The Bogdanov Affair, jguk 2, Louis Epstein, REX, Polygamy, Stevertigo, Lightbringer, Maoririder, Rex071404 4, Silverback, and Ultramarine cases. In the future I'd like to get even more involved in trying to build the workshop pages, which is where the decisions are crafted by the arbitrators, the involved parties, and any other member of the community who wants to make suggestions.

Questions

Support

  1. Support. David | explanation | Talk 00:04, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support. Mo0[talk] 00:05, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support. Antandrus (talk) 00:06, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Zach (Smack Back) Fair use policy 00:07, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. --Sean|Black 00:08, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Guettarda 00:11, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Michael Snow 00:11, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. --Ancheta Wis 00:12, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Strong Support. --Eliezer | £€åV€ m€ å m€§§åg€ 00:12, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Kirill Lokshin 00:17, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Support without reservations. – Quadell (talk) (bounties) 00:18, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. --Jaranda wat's sup 00:22, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Babajobu 00:26, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Support. --GraemeL (talk) 00:26, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Cryptic (talk) 00:31, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Strong support. Knowing that Jayjg was my likely replacement made me feel much happier about resigning. Ambi 00:38, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Support. Has proven to be an outstanding editor, conflict-resolver and member of ArbCom. Will, I am sure, continue to be as good at all three. Batmanand 00:43, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Support. Evil Eye 00:48, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Support ➥the Epopt 00:48, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Strong Support. Carbonite | Talk 00:50, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Nunh-huh 00:50, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Support - Mackensen (talk) 00:51, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Support, SqueakBox 00:57, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Support. KHM03 01:03, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Tony Sidaway|Talk 01:08, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Support. EWS23 | (Leave me a message!) 01:30, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Support--Duk 01:37, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  28. cookiecaper (talk / contribs) 01:40, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Support--ragesoss 01:46, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  30. SupportBunchofgrapes (talk) 01:47, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Support --Wgfinley 02:03, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Support per Batmanand. Kit 02:39, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Support -- Arwel (talk) 02:33, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Support - An editor that I'd like to carry around in my pocket - Wikipedical (talk) 21:27, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  35. --Ryan Delaney talk 03:01, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Support Fred Bauder 03:06, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose

  1. Oppose, questions. See my voting rationale. Talrias (t | e | c) 00:07, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Everyking 00:08, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Haukur 00:12, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. ugen64 00:13, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Ben 00:14, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Owen× 00:30, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Weak oppose based on questions. JYolkowski // talk 01:08, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Oppose didn't answer on several questions --Angelo 01:10, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Oppose. -- Миборовский U|T|C|M|E|Chugoku Banzai! 01:13, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. WhiteNight T | @ | C 01:16, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. TacoDeposit 01:21, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Strong Oppose --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 01:36, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Strong Oppose abuses admin powers Dabljuh 02:12, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Oppose. -- Dlyons493 Talk 02:20, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Oppose karmafist 02:22, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Oppose. Divisive. Grace Note 02:34, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Oppose - Edit wars, uses rollback in edit wars. --Phroziac . o º O (♥♥♥♥ chocolate!) 02:58, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Oppose Xoloz 03:03, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]