User talk:Jamyskis

Welcome to Wikipedia!

Hello Jamyskis, welcome to Wikipedia!

Here are some tips:

Read the Tutorial, How to edit a page and the Manual of Style.
Create a User page.
Sign your posts on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~).
Read the Policies and guidelines.
Add yourself to the New user log.
Ask questions at the Village pump or Help desk.
Be bold!
Use the Show preview button
Provide an Edit summary.

If you feel a change is needed, feel free to make it yourself! Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone (yourself included) can edit any article by following the Edit this page link. Wikipedia convention is to be bold and not be afraid of making mistakes. If you're not sure how editing works, have a look at How to edit a page, or try out the Sandbox to test your editing skills.

If, for some reason, you are unable to fix a problem yourself, feel free to ask someone else to do it. Wikipedia has a vibrant community of contributors who have a wide range of skills and specialties, and many of them would be glad to help. As well as the wiki community pages there are IRC Channels, where you are more than welcome to ask for assistance.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me on my talk page. Thanks and happy editing, Alphax ^τεχ 00:47, 13 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Willie Morris Bioff

The above is now a fat little article. Cheers. -- BDAbramson ^thimk 20:19, 2005 May 13 (UTC)

When changing your vote on VfD, it's customary (and helpful to the discussion closer) to strike out your previous vote(s) with <s></s> tags. Cheers, android↔talk 21:03, May 13, 2005 (UTC)

USS Constellation

Are you thinking of the "USS Constellation" in The Doomsday Machine by any chance? AlistairMcMillan 22:01, 28 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki-Hell

Unfortunately, Wiki-Hell is not in the article namespace - but feel free to send vandals and spamvertisers there nonetheless! Cheers. -- BDAbramson ^talk 04:24, 2005 Jun 2 (UTC)

I had wondered if it was worthwhile creating a seperate page on Wiki-Hell :-p Jamyskis 12:18, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Tongrentang

Hi. Tong Ren Tang is rewritten. Cheers. -- BDAbramson ^talk 16:56, 2005 Jun 13 (UTC)

Tom Barnard

Howdy. You voted to delete the initial version of Tom Barnard (VfD) , and rightly so, but I've made some substantive improvements to the article. I don't have any particular attachment to the article or its subject, so if you still feel that it ought to be deleted (not notable, etc.), that's fine by me; just thought I'd let you know. Cheers, AиDя01DTALKEMAIL 03:42, Jun 21, 2005 (UTC)

Wiki Hell

Like the idea - you might like some fire to keep it burning: Image:Large_bonfire.jpg :) A curate's egg 15:22, 14 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image source/licensing for Image:C64gs.jpg

The image you uploaded, Image:C64gs.jpg, has no source information. The image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, ie in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. Unless the copyright status is provided, the image will be marked for deletion on 24 October 2005.

This message notification has been automatically sent by NotificationBot managed and run by AllyUnion. Please leave comments regarding bot operations at AllyUnion's talk page. Please direct all comments regarding licensing information at Wikipedia talk:Images for deletion. --NotificationBot 13:29, 17 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

re:Toni-ann byfield

I didn't vote delete...I voted to KEEP and cleanup....[1]--MONGO 09:15, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

No problem...article looks better now anyway...happy editing!--MONGO 09:18, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Lord of the Rings Peer Review

Thank you for your enthusiasm in nominating LOTR for peer review. However, I fear that you were (in the words of the Ents) "hasty". The entire directions on nominating an article for peer review were at the top of the peer review page. Here they are, for future reference:

===How to make a request===

Anyone can request peer review here. When posting your request, include a brief description of the kind of comments/contributions you want, and sections of the article you think need to be reviewed. The best way to get lots of reviews is to reply promptly and appreciatively on this page to the comments you do get.
Procedure for adding nominations:

Place {{peerreview}} at the top of the article's talk page (not the article itself) to let other editors of the article know that the article is being peer reviewed.
From there, click on the link request has been made that appears in the new "peer review" box. This will open a page to discuss the review of your article.
Place ===[[name of nominated article]]=== at the top (do not forget the link brackets).
Below it, write your reason for nominating the article and sign by using four tildes (~~~~).
Place {{Wikipedia:Peer review/name of nominated article}} at the top of the list of nominees found on this page (Requests).
Politely request feedback on the discussion pages of one or more articles in the same or a related field, and/or send messages to one or more individual Wikipedians who have contributed to the same or a closely related field.

I have already fixed your peer review (since I was watching the George Washington Peer Review which you added it to), and the LOTR peer review can now be found here, or at the top of the peer review page. Thanks, and happy editing! --Trevdna 17:33, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your comments

I would like to point out to you that I never offered WP:IAR as a justification for my actions. That you say that I do suggests that you haven't actually read any of my statements on the affair. Please read what I've wrote, rather than what my detractors are saying about me, and reconsider whether your vote and your comments are grounded in fact. Thank you. Kelly Martin (talk) 14:03, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]