User talk:The stuart
Please feel free to leave The stuart any comments, suggestions, complaints, inquiries, concerns, friendly or other on this page. Also please incluid a signiture and timestamp for archival purposes. --The_stuart 18:45, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Your archive
You created your archive in the main article space; I've moved it to your User space, at User talk:The stuart/archive 1. Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 18:46, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Bush's popularity & 9/11
[1] [2] (from George_W._Bush#Public_Perception_and_Assessments) Kevin Baastalk 17:44, 2005 Apr 3 (UTC)
![[2]](http://www.pollkatz.homestead.com/files/pollkatzmainGRAPHICS_8911_image001.gif){kind=link}
You asked for sources. Kevin Baastalk 05:15, 2005 Apr 4 (UTC)
/scratch
those formulas are for this page on www.wikinfo.com. The site has only rudimentary TeX support, due to some XML compatibility issues. Thus, I used wikipedia's TeX support to create the images for the formulas, downloaded them, and uploaded them to the wikinfo article. (TeX is what's used to generate pretty math formulas) the page those formulas are for explains what the formulas about as best as I can. Kevin Baastalk 21:05, 2005 Apr 8 (UTC)
Thanks for creating the redirect List of Kings of England, of Scotland, of Great Britain, of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland, and of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. I was being sarcastic, you know! (and it should probably be List of monarchs of England, of Scotland, of Great Britain, of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland, and of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland :) -- ALoan (Talk) 17:37, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading Image:Razorback.JPG. Its copyright status is unclear, so it may have to be deleted. Please leave a note on the image page about the source of the image. Thank you.
This category should be moved to Category:Greatest American nominee --brian0918™ 15:13, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
I don't understand this category and can't see an article explaining it. Can you tell me the basis for its creation? Thank you. Ted Wilkes 15:28, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Thanks. Interesting. Ted Wilkes 15:39, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- This category was already created by another user, but was deleted via VfD. Don't be upset if someone decides to delete it again. — Frecklefoot | Talk 18:23, Jun 13, 2005 (UTC)
Stuart, I must take HARD exception to Michael Jackson being on any list with Harry S. Truman and Dwight D. Eisenhower. Truman and Eisenhower came from extreamly hard backgrounds, to put on uniforms, and risk their life for our country, then dedicated their lives to making things better for other people. They wanted to stop waring nations from ripping society apart, to make things safer. They wanted to build roads, courthouses, etc., to make the life of their fellow countrymen better. They faught hard to make policies to protect our borders. You need to take a hard look at history and values in men, and know the difference. If Mr. Jackson would have taken all the money he has spent on toys and needless medical procedures and given it instead to help homeless children. I hope that you reflect on the difference in character in these men, and men like them. Thank you for your time. WikiDon 01:00, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
| Image deletion warning | Image:Pea Island Semaphore.JPG has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. If you feel that this image should not be deleted, please go there to voice your opinion. |
Superm401 | Talk July 6, 2005 02:09 (UTC)
I see you have done some editing on Oz-related articles, so I thought I would let you know I have created a new WikiProject about Oz: WikiProject Oz. I hope to create a community to help guide the continued development of the articles about the series and its authors, characters, etc. toward even more quality articles. If you are interested, please add your name under the "Participants section" and please leave any comments or questions on the project's talk page or my user talk page. [[User:JonMoore|— —JonMoore 20:24, 29 May 2006 (UTC)]] 23:57, 12 August 2005 (UTC)
VfD/List of people stung by jelly fish
Haha I was searching what links to my name under User: pages and I saw yours and saw that VfD I closed. I never realized how funny that VfD was! Thanks for that history page :P Redwolf24 21:42, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
Hey! What's wrong with that category? It's every bit as useful as ""Fictional squirrels"! Wahkeenah 02:25, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
Bless you, my son, for deleting that stupid joke in that article. Wahkeenah 02:25, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Onze-Lieve-Vrouw-Waver.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Onze-Lieve-Vrouw-Waver.JPG. I notice it currently doesn't have an image copyright tag, so its copyright status is therefore unclear. Please add a tag to let us know its copyright status. (If you created/took the picture then you can use {{gfdl}} to release it under the GFDL. If you can claim fair use use {{fairuse}}.) If you don't know what any of this means, just let me know on the image description page where you got the images and I'll tag them for you. Otherwise, see Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. Thanks so much. --Secretlondon 19:08, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
What does beraid mean?
On Seven minutes in heaven you reverted a line that said 'beraid'. I initially changed it because I didn't know what the word meant. I can't find anything in a dictionary. What does it mean? KeithD (talk) 20:25, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
Re: Message you left for me
Thanks for the heads up, but as you probably noticed, I have created several articles and fixed the ones that originally I had pasted as a framework to work from. I usually just post as my IP, without logging in ( 24.98.198.164 ), so if you look at the history of all the pages, you can see that I have fixed them all. Thanks for the lookout though!, just be more careful in the future before accusing. :-) (sorry if the tone was a bit harsh, I have spent many, many hours editing and creating on here, and users who edit, and use wikipedia in the way that you do sometimes make me a bit angry sometimes. No ill will intended!) :-)
You tagged this with {{POV}} a while back. What is the reasoning? Can you explain yourself please. Thanks. --Lord Voldemort (Dark Mark) 18:22, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
- Something being not sourced hardly makes it POV. I'm going back to have a looksie, and if it's truly POV, I'll leave the tag, but if it's not, the tag goes. --Lord Voldemort (Dark Mark) 18:39, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
I placed the appropriate references in the article. Your reply on my talk page seemed a little hostile. I am truly sorry if I cam off hostile, that was never my intent. I will try to look over the article for POV, and take your comments into consideration. Once again, my humblest apologies. Cheers my friend. --Lord Voldemort (Dark Mark) 18:52, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
Image:Ben stein.JPG, which you uploaded, has been tagged as {{unverified}}. Please update this image as to its copyright and source, or else it will be deleted as per the new wikipedia policy. Thanks. --Rogerd 19:31, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
Hi, noticed ur suggestion about the meteorite on the above page. you seem to have forgotten to append your signature to the suggestion. You may want to do it now. Also, you may want to embolden the name of the article, as it is the convention followed on that page. --Gurubrahma 06:09, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
DYK
|
Did you know? has been updated. A fact from the article Paragould Meteorite, which you recently created, has been featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page. |
Hello, could you please add a licence and a source for that picture (please consider a change also on http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Cinnamon_roll.jpg], Thanks, Scriberius 05:27, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
List of movie cliches
Hi. No real harm done, but please discuss on the talk page before splitting a large page like that. Also, use good edit summaries and create a reciprocal link and talk note back to the original page. I covered all this on the LoMC talk page, but wanted to make sure you saw it. Thanks! Turnstep 00:18, 27 October 2005 (UTC)
Univ of Arkansas page / HogCall.com
On the University of Arkansas page, why did you remove the words "The very first" from the description of HogCall.com? It is a fact that I had the first Razorback website dedicated to the Razorbacks - even before the University had a page up. It has undergone a few name changes over the years, but it was still the very first.
M.A.D. is an acronym for "Mean and Dirty"
In answer to your question on Inspector Gadget, Yes, MAD stands for "Mean and Dirty". I don't think there is "official documention", and I don't recall it ever mentioned in the show, but a some of the toy mechandise like the Galoob Inspector Gadget doll, and a coloring book mentioned this on the packaging. It might not be "canon", but then again - It's just a cartoon. Cyberia23 21:09, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
- Dude, it's a KID'S SHOW, and that's what it means. I can't believe you're willing to argue about it. Cyberia23 18:47, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
- So with that analogy, just because you "never heard about it" means it's wrong? Cyberia23 02:08, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Image:Cinnamon roll.jpg
A tag has been placed on Image:Cinnamon roll.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a copyright violation and has no credible claim of fair use or permission. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.
Image Tagging Image:Jonti Picking.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Jonti Picking.JPG. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use {{gfdl}} to release it under the GFDL. If you can claim fair use use {{fairuse}}. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by going to "Your contributions" from your user page and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thanks so much. --Agnte 15:33, 20 November 2005 (UTC)
SEFOR
Hi, I stumbled across your article about SEFOR and cleaned it up a little. I find it very interesting! Can you provide any references (online or otherwise) for things like the pamphlets or the quote in the second paragraph? Thanks. Slicing 11:14, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
|
|
Did you know? has been updated. A fact from the article SEFOR, which you recently created, has been featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page. |
SEFOR
Look, I don't know how to put this "gently" so I won't try; your article on SEFOR was crap. It was a highly biased anti-nuke propaganda piece, violating everything that the Wiki is all about.
I don't even know what SEFOR was before I clicked the link. Regardless I was able to discern within seconds that the article had little to do with SEFOR. There was no technical discussion, nor did the article even mention that it was a FBR, which is why they built it in the first place.
From what I can tell, nothing bad ever happened at the reactor. Yet the article was written to make it out as a deathtrap and accident waiting to happen. In an attempt to "provide support" for this position you noted that the mass spec went down. Do you even know what a mass spec is, and what it's used for?
Check your biases at the door next time.
Maury 13:29, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
Image:Krispie.jpg has been listed for deletion
| An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:Krispie.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. |
Arkansas Images for deletion
Hey there, thanks for the heads up on the images being deleted! I did not upload all of those, but I will try to get all the source info I can to keep them from deletion. :) Later. (Cardsplayer4life 23:03, 6 January 2006 (UTC))
New main page draft
Hello! I noticed your negative comments regarding the proposed redesign, and I'd like to invite you to review a radically revamped revision, and to post your opinion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Usability/Main Page/Draft#Proposed_version. Thanks! —David Levy 22:00, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
Fouke Monster
The article has some kind of glitch in the Wikipedia: Catagory. You got the Arkansas one to function. The other one is redlined. Do you want me to ask a Admin. to correct this for you ? Martial Law 06:37, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
I've been there myself. The creature is still there, and the residents don't appreciate other people telling them that they're liars and such because they have seen a "non-approved" object. I nearly got shot by someone there who thought I was a skeptic. I am no longer there. I've been trying to fit the "Catagory: Cryptozoology" into the Wiki catagories, and failed. As to the "non-approved" commentary, see Robertson Panel. This was initiated by the CIA to "reduce" interest in UFOs and/or other paranormal phenomena by a system of intentional ridicule and abuse, such as this:"You,ve seen a Bigfoot ?!", one guy says to another. The other says,"(expletive) yeah.", the first guy says,"You tell others about this, they'll say you're (expletive) nuts.". The other guy reports this, and the police, etc., even his family says he is some kind of nut, and needs psychiatric care. The Robertson panel does indeed use psychiatrists to help discredit and ridicule people who has had these encounters.
If I had offended you, I do humbly apologise to you. Martial Law 06:37, 18 January 2006 (UTC)