Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James W. Prescott

James W. Prescott

Prescott isn't notable. Nothing in this entry is remarkable or encyclopedic. --Jason Gastrich 04:43, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Strong delete. Per nom. --Jason Gastrich 04:43, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep Dripping with notability, nominated probably because his views on sexuality are more tolerant than some. We've finished the atheist series and now we're doing the pro-LGBT series. Ruby 04:46, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep, bad faith nomination, Prescott is a well-known and notable behavioral psychologist, widely published in his field, and the developer of S-SAD theory. Check his c.v. - WarriorScribe 04:49, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Ruby. Crunch 04:50, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as above, clear WP:POINT nomination --keepsleeping quit your job! slack off! 04:52, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep A poor nomination. Dlyons493 Talk 05:06, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per all of the above except nominator. -- Dragonfiend 05:36, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Yet another bad faith nomination/WP:POINT violation from Gastrich. Guettarda 06:07, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep another bad faith nomination. Anybody checked to see if he just working through the "atheist" category, nominating every entry? Mark K. Bilbo 06:29, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - looks notable to me. Canley 09:50, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - clearly notable. --Bduke 11:34, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - from reading the article, it seems like he's made notable contributions to psychology. --Pierremenard 12:12, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I see also that his work is repeatedly cited by academics. --Pierremenard 12:14, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per WP:POINT and Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Jason Gastrich Just zis Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] AfD? 13:38, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep CalJW 14:12, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep notable per article and c.v.. --FloNight 15:12, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, notable --kingboyk 17:08, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Yet another bad faith nomination/WP:POINT violation from Gastrich. --Censorwolf 17:49, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep - quite notable. Jim62sch 18:07, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep due to notability and WP:POINT. Latinus 18:34, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --NaconKantari (話)|(郵便) 18:45, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]