Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xboy (2 nomination)

Rant speculation and see previous deletion debate Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Xboy. Unfortunately, the current article does not meet a speedy criteria, non-notable allegations just don't belong in an encyclopedia. --Mysidia (talk) 16:31, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete. Actually, the article does meet speedy criteria. Tagged for recreation of deleted material (CSD G4). SYCTHOS^talk 16:45, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's not a repost... CSD G4 refers to content that actually reached a delete consensus or had a legitimate CSD; in any case, it doesn't apply to this. --Mysidia (talk) 17:38, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete CSD G4. Rumors, heh. feydey 17:20, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This is not a speedy deletion, unfortunately. CSD:G4 only allows re-deletion of something which was already deleted by AFD or other consensus. This article was originally speedied; it must still meet a criterion for speedy deletion in order to be deleted again. It doesn't. That said, Wikipedia is not a crystal ball, so delete. Stifle 16:53, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This is a real thing; keep. Not speculation. WikiFanatic 23:45, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. This article isn't completely baseless. What about Halo 3, then? It's on wikipedia too. --Fire 19:36, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Complete bollocks. When the rumors become reality, then someone can write an article that is verifiable. —Cleared as filed. 23:41, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]