User talk:Jersey Devil

Damn, still learning how to use this thing.--Jersey Devil 00:43, 22 May 2005 (UTC)

Speak! Damn you wikipedians, I haven't had one comment yet. I order you to speak! Do not disobey your czar! Jersey Devil 18:58, 4 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Yes

This is Rangeley from BoR, proving it is a depressingly small internet. Rangeley 18:45, 5 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Oh hi man, you still in high school? IIRC you are in you should be in your last year right??? Anyway, check out U-P every once and a while. Jersey Devil 03:39, 9 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently your email is blocked. I can't email you.

Anyway, I don't care if you did it or not, though Lib tells me it was kylie that did it. I just think that you need to take a gigantic metal dildo, and fuck yourself up the ass for 4 whole days.

And by the way, you are not a centrist, nor will you ever be. You claiming otherwise does not make it so. Accept your orientation, liberal.

User:ro4444 21:22, 9 September 2005 (EST)

Yes...because a fascist sympathizer, who thinks anyone who smokes tobacco should be stoned to death, telling me that I am a "liberal" really offends me *rollseyes*. Why did you leave U-P anyway, there is a British clone of you named "Ryan Lian" taking up your trolling duties. Jersey Devil 20:40, 10 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

ROFL. Typical of you Y2A, to label anyone to the right of Jon Stewart as a fascist. I also enjoy how you have a tendency to put words into people's mouths; I have never said that anyone who smokes tobacco should be stoned to death, at least seriously. And Ryan Liam is your intellectual superior; I'd reder to him with more respect if I were you. User:ro4444 23:07, 10 September 2005 (EST)

PS Massachusetts and Boston pwn New Jersey (aka New York's landfill) and Newark.

obeys drug czar*

ro4444 has not told you people who do not know him, but he actually became a woman. I saw for myself, and he is just as hideous now as he was as a man! 168.18.147.68 02:53, 12 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Holloway

u said in the Natalee Holloway article.. Who gives a shit about this bitch? .....seriously Jersey Devil 02:02, 28 September 2005 (UTC)..., while the media attention is a bit much, it is by no means her fault, she does not deserve to be called a bitch, this is not appropriate to be discussing on a talk page, and im sure that if you were missing most likely raped and murdered, i dont think that you would mind the media attention and i also dont think that you would want to be called a bitch. Mac Domhnaill 00:52, 9 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Bolivian presidential election, 2005

Thanks for creating Bolivian presidential election, 2005. It seems to have taken off. Hopefully once the results come in, we can get them on there. I don't know where exactly on the internet official results would appear, however. Possibely here? --Descendall 00:47, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Your article just made the front page. --Descendall 13:57, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Fellow Rutgers student

Wassup Jersey Devil...

Just thought I would greet a fellow wikipedian that attends Rutgers. Would also like to congratuate you on your Bolivia Presidential election article. --dirtyliberal 21:34, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

New Jersey Legislature

Thanks for noticing all (or perhaps some) of the New Jersey Legislature-related edits! I've been devoting a great deal of time to ensure that each and every State Senator and Assembly member page has been created and updated and that each municipality reflects its elected representatives at the federal, state and county level (plus local, where availability and patience allow). That's what Wikiproject New Jersey is all about! Alansohn 19:16, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ollanta Humala

Hi Jersey Devil, I am Gonzalo and I am Peruvian. I saw what you wrote in the spanish article about this guy and I can tell you that his life before 2000 is not known. The few things we now about him is that he studied in a Chinese school in Lima and was a soccer player (he quit because he sucked) and then was member of the Peruvian Army.

Well, personally I dislike him completely , as many peruvians I support Lourdes Flores Nano (she is the best candidate but is in second place). Ollanta Humala is an "anti-sistema" and admires Juan Velasco Alvarado (the worst President ever) and Hugo Chávez. Well, that's it. Take care and say hi to all Peruvians there in the USA!. Bye . --Gonzalo (AvLa!) 22:11, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Political Parties of Peru

Hello there! Thanks for your help in the article. if you can, take a look at the one in Spanish Wikipedia and try to give an accurate statement in the dispute. Cheers! Messhermit 17:37, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Martha Chávez

You edited Martha Chávez to say that her party is Cambio 90. However, I'm not sure that's the case. I was under the (possibly mistaken) impression that Cambio 90 doesn't exist anymore. Even the article uses the past tense. I know that Chávez's official political party for the 2006 presidential race is Alizana para el Futuro, but I think that might have just been made up out of thin air after the JNE kicked Si Cumple off the ballot. I'm not sure if either Alianza or Si Cumple are parties in the Congress. Could you clarify this for me? Thanks. --Descendall 05:49, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I just checked out her page and it says Cambio 90, so I guess it still does exist. I have no idea when that thing was updated, though. I imagine that I'm not the only one who has a hard time keeping track of the ever-changing political alliances of Peru. --Descendall 05:53, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Belated 1st Barnstar

On behalf of the Wikipedia community, this Exceptional Newcomer Award is hereby presented to Jersey Devil for exemplary contributions to Latin America related articles, in particular for the addition of a list of graduates from the School of the Americas article, and for displaying exceptional enthusiasm, skill, and boldness beyond your experience. Keep up the great work! Ombudsman 04:35, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Jersey Devil is a Rangers fan?

Your user page shows so much beautiful Jersey pride until that vile R*ngers logo on the bottom. For shame. -- D.M. ^(talk) 14:43, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sonny Guerrini

I'm just curious. Did you just follow my listing of Driving rock movement because that was the next article I was going to list for deletion? =)

SpinnWebe page deletion

Not that it matters at this point, but just wanted to point out that the page was not made by me, as I take the "don't create pages about yourself" wiki rule to heart. I did expand on it, but wasn't the primary contributor to it. (I am the only SpinnWebe webmaster.) Unfortunately I didn't see this until someone just pointed out to me that it'd been deleted already. --Spinn 19:06, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about the "recreation of deleted material" but when I went to the site it did not say that it had been deleted ... it just said that no article existed (and I knew one did, so I looked it up in my webcache and replaced it). I didn't see any link to a mention of a vote for deletion.JohnRussell 17:20, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

SpinnWebe removal of speedy delete notice

Just to let you know, I have reverted your removal of the speedy template again, citing the following from the box itself:

If you disagree with its speedy deletion, please explain why on its talk page or at Wikipedia:Speedy deletions. If this page obviously does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, or you intend to fix it, please remove this notice, but do not remove this notice from pages that you have created yourself.

As you can see here, the article has been improved since its restoration. I also doubt that Spinn has recruited people. The site does, however, have a following, and the article likely was on several people's watch-lists before being AFD'd, and then surprisingly reappeared on our watchlists after a user created an entirely new article about the same subject.

This is not "sinking so low" - this is the way Wikipedia works, and it appears there is consensus that the SpinnWebe article should stay. SchuminWeb (Talk) 00:19, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Spinnwebe

If an article is recreated even after an AFD decided to delete it, it can be tagged as a speedy deletion candidate. Check out WP:CSD, it is rule 4 under "General". Or notify the admin that closed the AFD on his talk page. ;-) — Kimchi.sg | Talk 00:58, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. I came here via your comment on Terenceong1992's talk age.

P.P.S. I'm surprised and sad that no one welcomed you for four months... so for completeness' sake, a belated welcome template follows:

Welcome!

Hello, Jersey Devil, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! — Kimchi.sg | Talk 01:07, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Spinnwebe AfD

With regards to your "Strong Delete" at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SpinnWebe - can you please address the question of why Spinnwebe does not meet criteria 1 of WP:WEB? Per WP:WEB this alone merits its inclusion, regardless of the previous AfD vote which did not take this criteria into account or what you think of the various editors weighing in and their motivations. I find the wording of your criticism to be not very accepting of good faith.

I can assert that the site was a popularly trafficked site 10 years ago on the web, in addition to the various reviews and articles cited within the article and AfD page showing non-trivial media mentions. I think it's established that it's notable. In addition, the article is detailed and not "web directory" or advertising material. It clearly describes a (once very popular, now slightly popular) site with a long history. Do you have any counter-argument to that? KWH 08:39, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]