User talk:Nichalp

About this page...

POST A NEW MESSAGE

Archives
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27

Please do not reply to topics more than 3 days old. I may miss it. If you wish to revive an old topic of discussion, copy the entire text of that topic (including any WikiSyntax) and put it at the bottom by following the edit link above.
I will usually reply on your talk page
I usually archive every 15 days or if the page size > 30kb.
Since I am pretty busy these days, I may be able to reply only after a week or so.

Bangalore Peer review

Hello Nichalp,

A peer-review for the Bangalore article is currently under way. I invite you to please provide your thoughts and valuable insight to help improve the quality of the article before we push the article for a FA nomination. Details of recent work done to consolidate and clean-up the article can be found on Talk:Bangalore ("To-do List"). Thanks! AreJay 18:48, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem of Mahuri

Hello Mr. Bhadani & all Wikipedia_User, I have already indiacated the source of this content on site www.mahurivaisya.com. And i am sorry about this. And i want to say thanks to all of you to informing about this source indication on this site. Thank you, Sanjeev — Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.16.179.100 (talk • contribs)

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Genisock2

I'm pretty sure I never proposed useing a bot.Geni 05:52, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pizzadeliveryboy

Hi Nichalp, I believe you've interacted with this user. He has been making lots of changes to articles such as Bollywood but does not discuss them or address concerns raised on talkpages. He has manually copy-paste moved Mahatma Gandhi to Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi despite a discussion as recent as one week in which the consensus was not to do so. I have reverted his changes, but I am wondering if there is any thing else that can be done to put a stop to his ways so far? He also comes across as incivil, imo. --Gurubrahma 07:12, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

He has blanked my message to him and left this [1] on my talkpage. Should I take it to WP:ANI to request a block or should I file a RfC?? I am not very inclined to do the latter, however. TIA, --Gurubrahma 17:53, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Festivals/Classical dance

Your edit left only S Indian classical dance standing, while pruning all the N Indian ones!!! I have reverted some of them, and classified to make sense. The argument is that only those patronized by classical art institutions such as the Sangeet Natak Akademi and such need (and should) be included.

If parochial fests such as Onam and Pongal are to be included, so do DP and GC. ofcourse expats from TN and KL celebrate them all over India, but the same argument apps to DP and GC too.

May be concentrating on adding non-Hindu fests/folk art ought to be the focus now.

Pizzadeliveryboy 15:30, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation

You are invited to take part in Wikipedia_talk:Changing username#Dropping inactive user names. Ems2 17:43, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

my rfa

just to clarify did the rfa finish on fail, or no conseus?Benon 11:05, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

cuisine of india

forget art for now, lets talk about cuisine - I tried looking into the wikipedia:WikiProject countries page - Can you show me the link/section which says Cuisine should be in the Culture section. Moreover, the main article item should then inc Cuisine of India

Pizzadeliveryboy 17:39, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Indian geography

best regards Tobias Conradi (Talk) 05:17, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:List_of_Indian_districts#X_District - I moved your notes to the points they refer to. So we can easier reply to each other. Hope this is ok for you? "X Empire" is used consistent for articles. There is only one "X kingdom" - maybe change your comment. Tobias Conradi (Talk) 11:23, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Inactivity

I will be definitely very inactive for next 4 weeks, till mid-March, because of exams :( After that, I have 4 days (only!?) holidays, during which I will (hopefully) be super-active. After that I begin my 10th grade n what with the boards n all, I don't expect to ever be as active as I was.--May the Force be with you! Shreshth91($ |-| r 3 $ |-| t |-|) 10:17, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cape Horn

Hi, Thanks for your comments in the Cape Horn FAC. I believe I've addressed them -- do you have any further comments? — Johan the Ghost _seance 16:17, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

why don't start Wikiproject Geography of India

Hi Nichalp, Why don't we start a Wikiproject Geography of India.That will generalise several Wikiprojects like Indian states and Indian cities and also will incorporate other Indian geography related articles.Ofcourse, there are advantages of separate projects of States and Cities,but I feel Geography of India will be a broader project in which may be more Wikipedians will join ! Bye--Dwaipayanc 16:31, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Indian Independence Movement

Could you take a look into it? Some anon has started ranting against wikipedia inside the article!!! The guy yesterday tried to put a large amount of discussion on Jules Verne's novel somehow being related to IIM, which was reverted. Then he added a lot of personal commentry, which Deepak and Sundar reverted. Now he is inserting rants which include words like The stupid traitor dogs", and also censorship in wikipedia. Since I've already done two reverts today, I'm not going to rv further, so could you look into the matter? Thanks. --Ragib 01:20, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

source request

The Atlas moth was first discovered in the Sanjay Gandhi National Park, Mumbai, India. I am curious about the source of this information. From what I see, the species was described by Linnaeus in 1758. Shyamal 04:44, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, this confirms my view. We get the Atlas moths in many places in India. When the reporter wrote it, s/he meant that it was seen in SGNP. I think the mention in the Atlas moth article implies that it was first described from a specimen that came to the hands of Linnaeus and that this specimen was obtained from SGNP. I am taking off the line from Atlas moth but the statement in the SGNP article is correct ! Shyamal 10:27, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Political integration of India

Have you seen Talk:Political integration of India/Comments? -- ALoan (Talk) 11:32, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

I miss you! --Bhadani 07:42, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

:( I'll try and hang around more often in the future. :)

Actually, I wanted your suggestions about nominating few more editors for adminship, particularly those editors who are familiar with Indian reality as our India-related contents are growing and perhpas we require few more administrators. --Bhadani 14:55, 24 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanx very much for the page-move Nichalp -- lets hope not to have more problems. But hey, no danger of ever lacking for those: somehow, the talk-page did not get moved! Maybe because the fork had developed its own talkpage -- does it need cut-paste and another move? Happily, all the archives connect to the correct name. Sorry to come back with trouble. Regards, ImpuMozhi 18:50, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest we let the talk pages remain as they are to maintain the history. We can copy and paste the text to the Rajput talk page with a pointer to the redundant page. =Nichalp «Talk»= 04:33, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pages about India in other language Editions of Wikipedia

Here is a page India in Mahl Language. (202.1.193.14 15:57, 20 February 2006 (UTC))[reply]

Thanks, I've added it to the India article. However, since it is a RTL script, I can't point to the exact name of India. Would you be knowing how to do this? Thanks, =Nichalp «Talk»= 04:33, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Victoriamemorial.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Victoriamemorial.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Thuresson 20:30, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've tagged and relicenced the image. Regards, =Nichalp «Talk»= 04:33, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your help. Somebody uploaded the photo to commons:Image:Victoriamemorial.jpg. I have updated the image description there so that you are credited. Regards, Thuresson 10:11, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. =Nichalp «Talk»= 18:21, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your wishes

Thank you for the wishes, Nichalp. And I love your birthday present. :) -- Sundar ^{\talk \contribs} 05:34, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lothal

Hi Nicholas - Lothal is awfully close to FAC. If/when you have time, can you please give it a final look? The last time you commented you said the FU images and lack of multiple refs were a problem. I've worked to address both issues, but the core ref is a guidebook which gives most of the details, while the FU images are integral despite my adding other properly licensed images. I certainly value your advice. Rama's Arrow 13:07, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Howdy

Thought you may wish to take another look at Glacier retreat. I added some more to the Asia section and we have trimmed the N.American and Alaskan sections as well. The TOC is no longer TOCleft. Much of the Asia information is very hard to get and that is a shame as I know there is much that can be learned by it, but I managed to find three more excellent pieces of evidence. If you get a change, you may wish to revisit the article to see if it is in more compliance with the excellent issues you raised. Thanks!--MONGO 21:14, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't look trimmed to me. Move the details to daughter articles and provide a summary here. Regards, =Nichalp «Talk»= 08:46, 24 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Indef blocking

I indef blocked Chutiyaallah (talk · contribs) for inappropriate user name, and also for vandalism on Pakistan. Let me know if that was ok (I've seen several precedents on usernames). Thanks. --Ragib 04:30, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Perfectly executed block. =Nichalp «Talk»= 08:37, 24 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ragib did a correct block. I can not believe that a person may be so perverted in his outlook...--Bhadani 14:48, 24 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Derivative & commercial use for images

Hi, I saw that at User talk:Pizzadeliveryboy#Maps of Mumbai copyright and Wikipedia talk:Notice board for India-related topics/archive4#Template:PD-IndiaGov you have stated that for all the images uploaded into Wikipedia derived and commercial use should be allowed. As is usually the case, IANAL but AFAICT this is only true for those images for which fair use is not being claimed. Such images can also be uploaded into commons:, but for images used under fair use derived and commercial use are not allowed. It might not always be legal to include even unmodified fair-use in copies of Wikipedia content, e.g. if the copy is not in the USA and the image is such that US fair-use law allows it but the fair-use law in the country in which the copy resides doesn't. Commercial use of fair-use images is obviously prohibited. I'm skeptical about the legality of modifying fair-use images, i.e. derived use of these images (except for personal use). -- Paddu 16:28, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Since PDB did not have a complete understanding of copyright issues, I mentioned acceptable wiki licences in plain English. There are many free images available for the Mumbai article, so uploading fair use images are rather redundant. To upload an image under the FU clause, one must: 1. Justify its usage 2. Use it in context. 3. Not dwell on the subject of the image. Since the issue on FU is a picky issue on WP, my first goal was to prevent newbies from uploading unnecessary images to WP till they had completely grasped wikipedia rules.

I just wanted to make sure you understood the slight "exception" to your statement for "fair-use" images. I was afraid people might misunderstand you or WP:FU due to those statements.

WRT if the copy is not in the USA and the image is such that US fair-use law allows it but the fair-use law in the country in which the copy resides doesn't. I'm not conversant with international copyright laws, but since the servers are based in Florida, local laws apply. (This also applies to other transnational laws.). Images in commons: are governed by the the nationality of the uploader or the source nation of the image. =Nichalp «Talk»= 17:33, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Neither am I conversant with international copyright laws (or even national copyright laws for that matter :) ). I was just saying derived use of a Wikipedia image outside of the US might not be allowed if the derived image is outside of the US. -- Paddu 17:48, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

True. But since local laws do not have original jurisdiction over another country, little can be done by the aggrieved country. =Nichalp «Talk»= 18:00, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

More Admins

Nothing to be sad about - you are working in a wider field now and thanks for the suggestions. --Bhadani 13:45, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lothal is finally FAC!!

Hi Nicholas - please take a bit of time to vote up-or-down at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Lothal. Its finally FAC!! Thank you for your advice and help - I've removed some non-essential FU images. Rama's Arrow 06:35, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My RFA

Thank you for supporting my successful Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Raven4x4x request for adminship. I'll try to put the admin tools to good and responsible use. If I do anything wrong you know where to find me. Raven4x4x 07:25, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Portal:India COTW

It looks like the Indian portal stands a good chance at becoming INCOTW for next week. Even if it dosen't, as you say, we should probably clean it up and allow for better organization. I would like to propose a change in the color combination used in the portal main page — it currently looks dull. The Australian portal's fontpage is interesting and perhaps we can model our frontpage based on that. I will work on some layouts this week and probably over the weekend. I don't think the entire cleanup process should take that long. Let me know what you think. Cheers! AreJay 22:16, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yup, I agree the colours are a bit dull. What colours do you suggest? =Nichalp «Talk»= 09:52, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pakistan peer review

Thank you for your comments on the Pakistan peer review. You made a comment about removing all fair use images from the article. May I ask, out of my own ignorance, why they should be removed? Pepsidrinka 13:51, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

thanks

Hi Nicholas - thanks for the link! I've incorporated it into the article. Rama's Arrow 13:27, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Holi 2006

Hello, Nichalp. I'm back with the same question from last year: When is Holi this year ? March 14th or 15th ? BTW, is there such a thing as "Sikh New Year" on March 14th / Chēt 1st ? -- PFHLai 17:04, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]