Jump to content

Paradox

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Lorenzo Martelli (talk | contribs) at 16:42, 24 June 2004. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

This article is about the logic concept. Borland Paradox is a database management tool.
File:Monty-hall.png
The Monty Hall paradox: which door do you choose?

A paradox is an apparently true statement that seems to lead to a logical self-contradiction, or to a situation that contradicts common intuition. The identification of a paradox based on seemingly simple and reasonable concepts has often led to significant advances in science, philosophy and mathematics.

In moral philosophy, paradox plays a particularly central role in debates on ethics. For instance, an ethical admonition to "love thy neighbour" is in (not just contrast but) contradiction with an armed neighbour actively trying to kill you: if he or she succeeds, then, you will not be able to love them. But to preemptively attack them or restrain them is not usually understood as very loving. This might be termed an ethical dilemma; another example is the conflict between an injunction not to steal and one to care for a family that you cannot afford to feed except with stolen money.

Types of paradox

Common themes in paradoxes include direct and indirect self-reference, infinity, circular definitions, and confusion of levels of reasoning.

Not all paradoxes are equal. For example, the Birthday paradox is more of a surprise than a paradox, while the resolution of Curry's paradox is still a matter of contention.

W. V. Quine [1] distinguished three classes of paradox.

  • A veridical paradox produces a result that appears absurd but is demonstrated to be true nevertheless. Thus, the paradox of Frederic's birthday in The Pirates of Penzance establishes the surprising fact that a person may be more than N years old on his Nth birthday. Likewise, Arrow's impossibility theorem involves behavior of voting systems that is surprising but all too true.
  • A falsidical paradox establishes a result that not only appears false but actually is false; there is a fallacy in the supposed demonstration. The various invalid proofs (e.g. that 1 = 2) are classic examples, generally relying on a hidden division by zero. Another example would be the Horse paradox.
  • A paradox which is in neither class may be an antinomy, which reaches a self-contradictory result by properly applying accepted ways of reasoning. For example, the Grelling-Nelson paradox points out genuine problems in our understanding of the ideas of truth and description.


List of paradoxes

Not all paradoxes fit neatly into one category. Some paradoxes include:

Veridical paradoxes

These are unintuitive results of correct logical reasoning.

  • Paradox of entailment: Inconsistent premises always make an argument valid.
  • Apportionment paradox: Some systems of apportioning representation can have unintuitive results
  • Averaging - the mathematical concept of an average, whether defined as the mean or median, leads to apparently paradoxical results - for example, it is possible that moving an entry from Wikipedia to Wiktionary would increase the average entry length on both sites - Will Rogers phenomenon
  • Arrow's paradox/Voting paradox/Condorcet paradox: You can't have all the attributes of an ideal voting system at once
  • Banach-Tarski paradox: Cut a ball into 5 pieces, re-assemble the pieces to get two balls, both of equal size to the first.
  • Birthday paradox: What is the chance that two people in a room have the same birthday?
  • Borel's paradox: Conditional probability density functions are not invariant under coordinate transformations.
  • Burali-Forti paradox: If the ordinal numbers formed a set, it would be an ordinal number which is smaller than itself.
  • Elevator paradox: Elevators can seem to be mostly going in one direction, as if they were being manufactured on the roof, and disassembled in the basement.
  • Galileo's paradox: Though most numbers are not squares, there are no more numbers than squares.
  • Gabriel's Horn or Torricelli's trumpet: A simple object with finite volume but infinite surface area. Also, the Mandelbrot set and various other fractals have finite area, but infinite perimeter.
  • Hausdorff paradox: The exists a countable subset C of the sphere S such that S\C is equidecomposable with with two copies of itself.
  • Hilbert's paradox of the Grand Hotel: If a hotel with infinitely many rooms is full, it can still take in more guests.
  • Monty Hall problem: An unintuitive consequence of conditional probability.
  • Monty Hell problem: Positive daily profits yield zero assets in the limit.
  • Raven paradox (or Hempel's Ravens): Observing a red apple increases the likelihood of all ravens being black.
  • Richard's paradox: A complete list of definitions of real numbers doesn't exist.
  • Simpson's paradox: An association in sub-populations may be reversed in the population. It appears that two sets of data separately support a certain hypothesis, but, when considered together, they support the opposite hypothesis.
  • Statistical paradox: It is quite possible to draw wrong conclusions from correlation. For example, towns with a larger number of churches generally have a higher crime rate - because both result from higher population. A professional organization once found that economists with a PhD actually had a lower average salary than those with a BS - but this was found to be due to the fact that those with a PhD worked in academia, where salaries are generally lower.
  • Abilene paradox: People take actions in contradiction to what they really want to do, and therefore defeat the very purposes of what they were trying to accomplish.
  • Buridan's ass: How can a rational choice be made between two outcomes of equal value?
  • Control paradox: Man can never be free of control, for to be free of control is to be controlled by oneself.
  • Paradox of hedonism: When one pursues happiness itself, one is miserable; but, when one pursues something else, one achieves happiness.
  • Epicurian Paradox: The existence of evil is incompatible with the existence of God.

Falsidical paradoxes

These are incorrect results of subtly false reasoning.

Paradoxes that show flaws in accepted reasoning, axioms, or definitions. Note that many of these are special cases, or adaptations, of the Russell's paradox.

Antinomies of definition

These paradoxes rest simply on an ambiguous definition.

Conditional paradoxes

These are paradoxes only if certain special assumptions are made. Some of these show that those assumptions are false or incomplete, others are other types of paradoxes.

Other paradoxes

  • Giffen paradox: can increasing the price of bread make poor people eat more of it?
  • Kavka's toxin puzzle: Can one intend to drink the nondeadly toxin, if the intention is the only thing needed to get the reward?
  • Moore's paradox: "It's raining but I don't believe that it is."
  • Low birth weight paradox: low birth weight babies have a higher mortality rate, babies of smoking mothers have lower average birth weight, babies of smoking mothers have a higher mortality rate, but low birth weight babies of smoking mothers have a lower mortality rate than other low birth weight babies.

References

See also