Talk:Lashkar-e-Taiba
Appearance
RFC
Terrorist or Militant ?
LET is definitely a terrorist organization. It has been added to the US list of terror organizations
definitions as per Merriam-Webster:
militant -
- engaged in warfare or combat : FIGHTING (LET is not involved in warfare nor combat - suicide missions don't qualify as either, neither do massacres)
- aggressively active (as in a cause) : COMBATIVE <militant conservationists> <a militant attitude> (does not apply)
terorist -
- the systematic use of terror especially as a means of coercion
LET is a terror organization, not a militant organization.--IMpbt 17:05, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)
alleged involvement
LeT has claimed responsibility of some of these terrorist acts. Why still say "India accuses......." for other incidents?
- Because as you said "some" of these acts. India has accused them for several things, infact if it were possible, it would probably blame the group for a lot of its problems. Regardless, there need to be sources for definite acts by the group. Btw, there is also a source needed for the "pamphlet" material that you added otherwise those sentences will be removed. I will leave the material as it is for now, but unless a source is provided, it is objectionable. Thanks. --Anonymous editor 02:20, Jun 26, 2005 (UTC)
Changed the meaning of Lashkar-e-Toiba to army of the pure, it had been changed by someone to a derogatory word in Hindi- fkh8
All the millitants should be made to stand in a row and shooted rite on the head , they dont have self pride also , can they see us rite in the face ? if they have guts face us straight, dont hide and hurt the innocent.......................