Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User talk:So1oman

User talk:So1oman

Copyvio attack page against a Florida gubernatorial candidate; editor's only edits were one to this page and a handful to the candidate's page. BDAbramson T 03:36, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Without the copyvio content, page is empty anyway. Xoloz 04:23, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete composed entirely of cpvio content AdamJacobMuller 18:30, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
so1oman 20:30, 14 March 2006 (UTC) There is no copyright violation. I am the original author and editor of both articles and have posted them elsewhere as well. All content is fully supported by the linked 'pdf' (Adobe) files. I can add copyright notices to the related articles if that would help. email4hill@comcast.net[reply]
- so1oman I have added my copyright notification to the related articles.
The copyright issues seem to have been resolved. This is nevertheless an editorial that seems to have little to do with the creation of an encyclopedia. We allow some latitude on userpages but they are still provided for the benefit of Wikipedia. Unless you can make a claim that this is contributing to the creation of an article somewhere, this does appear to be a misuse of the userspace. Please read Wikipedia:User page. Rossami (talk) 22:42, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Wikipedia is not a free webspace provider, especially for political messages. --TantalumTelluride 23:07, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- so1oman Do whatever you feel is appropriate. No sense arguing with you. I assume you'll be deleting all other contributions that can be interpreted as containing political messages, right? So much for encyclopedic entries that reflect varying viewpoints. At least readers will have access to YOUR viewpoint, if no one else's. Seems like a rather hollow legacy to leave behind.