User talk:Derex/1

on break. can be emailed if needed. Derex 18:25, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You are right and I was wrong

I was jumping around between the main page and the cat-"adopting" page. I should have added the category to the main page in the first place. I was wrong and I admit it. Thank you for reminding me of my error so that I will know to check my work on Senator Frist's page once more time. I am a bit under duress because I am dealing with a non-communicative reverter. -- Pinktulip 00:44, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wookies

Cyrus is notable mostly for his fight with the Metafilter crew over the greenlighting hoax and their extraordinary efforts to vandalize his Wiki article and the other non-WP bizarre acts of stalking and vandalism perpetrated by that gang. The Wookie reference and vandalism would be trite for almost any other bio, but not for Farivar, because the retaliatory vandalism is such a central part of his story. Morton devonshire 02:26, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

yo

graduating in 4 weeks, but I'll be around until june. you coming by my area anytime soon? --kizzle 01:43, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the welcome

Derek, thanks for the kind welcome; I assumed that sockpuppet was a generic (and funny) slur, thanks for setting me straight.

(Metamessage: I'm guessing that this is how I send a message back to you (the edit-everything paradigm takes a while to get used to...). If not, sorry.)

Lauren B. Weiner

Please don't leave on account of a POV warrior. We need as many sensible people as we can get. Gamaliel 04:37, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly what I was going to say. Every day I fix stuff, and every day I find more stuff that needs to be fixed. If you get too frustrated, consider that Rex is gone. JamesMLane t c 09:06, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

By "sensible" I presume you mean the same POV as you have? I like to think I bring NPOV where there was none before. Please AGF. I am no more of a "POV warrior" than Gamaliel. In fact I think I am quite a bit less of one.--Tbeatty 01:47, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Derek I hope you stay. Because you have challenged the aricle on Weiner, I have started a more general article on the DSCC Credit Report Scandal. I think that is a more appropriate place. --Tbeatty 01:47, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for coming back. I agree with your comment except I think it deserves it's own article on the incident rather than have Michael Steele's bio saddled with the controversy and details. THings like this tend to swamp bio's and it's not fair to either Steele or Weiner to dominate their life over incidents like this. --Tbeatty 02:01, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Thank you for commenting on my recent request for bureaucratship. I deeply appreciate the comments and feedback that you left me. I hope that I can improve and gain your support in the future. Thanks! Flcelloguy (A note?) 23:18, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]