Jump to content

User talk:ILBobby

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 61.18.170.47 (talk) at 17:02, 13 March 2012 (AfD for Chronology_of_diplomatic_recognitions_and_relations_of_South_Sudan). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome!

talk

need to telling you some stuff Ijanderson977 (talk) 19:07, 2 June 2008 (UTC) MSN ;) Ijanderson977 (talk) 16:51, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

MSN ja? Ijanderson977 (talk) 21:04, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

BTW i archived your talk page > > > > >
Hope you dont mind ;) Ijanderson977 (talk) 21:12, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Gordon Brown

Gordo goes to the doctors and says "every time i look in the mirror i get aroused". The doctor replied "Im not suprised, your a c*nt" lol. Chat? Ijanderson977 (talk) 18:42, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yo! Bobby, chit chat? msn yeh. Let me know when your online, then i'll come on msn ;) Ijanderson977 (talk) 15:32, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Where are you? Ijanderson977 (talk) 19:00, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. In light of the fact that it is the first book the U.S. government ever went to court to censor before its publication(!), I was hoping you could help improve the The CIA and the Cult of Intelligence article as part of an effort to make it worthy of becoming a featured article candidate? --Loremaster (talk) 14:11, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

End of Diplomatic Missions by country Category

Hi, Russavia is currently removing the "Category:Diplomatic Missions by country" tag from these articles. His reason relates to putting articles in categories and sub-categories - you may read it on his talk page. I do not share his view, nor do I think it was prudent for him to make the changes without consulting first. Please make your judgement on this matter and advise him on his talk page. Kransky (talk) 12:03, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notwithstanding protests by others, and without providing a reason that we can be satisfied with, Russavia has continued to implement his changes that degrade the Diplomatic Missions by Country the articles. Most recently he has added a list of ambassadors to Diplomatic missions of Russia.
I have written to him a sterner note on his talk page, stating that the Diplomatic missions by country tag belong to articles, not to category pages. Unless a consensus emerges it will remain this way.
I would appreciate if you remain seized of this issue for the time being. Kransky (talk) 10:54, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Request for Comment

As per advice on WP:EAR I have moved issues of Russavia's behaviour and its effects on the Diplomatic Missions by Country articles to Wikipedia:Requests for comment/User:Russavia. Please provide comment - by all means seek his side of the story. Please confirm on the talk page within 48 hours that you have tried to resolve a dispute with Russavia and have failed Kransky (talk) 12:03, 26 June 2008 (UTC).[reply]

MSN

You online mate? Ijanderson977 (talk) 20:17, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

talk? Ijanderson977 (talk) 17:24, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
im online mate, but let me know when to come on to msn yeh? ;) Ijanderson977 (talk) 10:23, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Im comming on msn now Ijanderson977 (talk) 14:57, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
you online? Ijanderson977 (talk) 16:53, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Shall i come on msn? Ijanderson977 (talk) 18:25, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
MSN ja? Ijanderson977 (talk) 11:08, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Let's chat sometimes on MSN Ari d'Kosova (talk) 03:54, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Im Back

Egypt was ace. Let me know when your online mate Ijanderson977 (talk) 18:54, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hia

So i go to Amsterdam for 5 days. Come back home and i find out the world has gone chaotic, war with Georgia and Russia, coup in Mauritania, UK economy shit ect. At least recognition for Kosovo and Olympics is cool Ijanderson977 (talk) 12:53, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In 5 min mate, you stupid bastard! Ijanderson977 (talk) 18:33, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I got in man. Well good. Brap! Msn? Ijanderson977 (talk) 11:15, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Malaysian Liaison Office denies freezing the recognition procedure. (in Albanian) English version]. Ijanderson (talk) 15:32, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
check this out User:Evlekis. Ijanderson (talk) 22:17, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
[1] chat? Ijanderson (talk) 08:28, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Czech Rep

Im back. Msn? Ijanderson (talk) 17:21, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'll be on msn in 10-15 min. Be there lol Ijanderson (talk) 18:34, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Kosovo is lobbying

[2] Speaker of Parliament of the Republic of Kosovo, Jakup Krasniqi met with many foreign ambassadors in a visit to the US. Apparently the "Haitian government is in the process of recognition of Kosovo independence.". HAHAH! go on. Also i saw your thing on the site ;) Let me know when your online mate Ijanderson (talk) 15:10, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oxford Wikimania 2010 and Wikimedia UK v2.0 Notice

Hi,

As a regularly contributing UK Wikipedian, we were wondering if you wanted to contribute to the Oxford bid to host the 2010 Wikimania conference. Please see here for details of how to get involved, we need all the help we can get if we are to put in a compelling bid.

We are also in the process of forming a new UK Wikimedia chapter to replace the soon to be folded old one. If you are interested in helping shape our plans, showing your support or becoming a future member or board member, please head over to the Wikimedia UK v2.0 page and let us know. We plan on holding an election in the next month to find the initial board, who will oversee the process of founding the company and accepting membership applications. They will then call an AGM to formally elect a new board who after obtaining charitable status will start the fund raising, promotion and active support for the UK Wikimedian community for which the chapter is being founded.

You may also wish to attend the next London meet-up at which both of these issues will be discussed. If you can't attend this meetup, you may want to watch Wikipedia:Meetup, for updates on future meets.

We look forward to hearing from you soon, and we send our apologies for this automated intrusion onto your talk page!

Addbot (talk) 23:00, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Message me

...as soon as you come online please. Then we can talk on msn ;) Ijanderson (talk) 18:10, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nicaragua recognised ABSO btw Ijanderson (talk) 18:17, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I'll be on msn in 2 min Ijanderson (talk) 18:19, 3 September 2008 (UTC):[reply]
MSN mate? Ijanderson (talk) 16:17, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Let me know when you've logged in please ;) Ijanderson (talk) 18:18, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
LOL! Ijanderson (talk) 12:20, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
MSN? Ijanderson (talk) 17:14, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Apparently Russian citizens are becoming more pro Kosovo [3] MSN? Ijanderson (talk) 15:27, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Im in Wales now. Uni is ace. Sooooo good. Let me know if your to go on msn. Laters Ijanderson (talk) 10:26, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yo msn? User:Mike Babic read this profile lol Ijanderson (talk) 11:06, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
[4] MSN mate? Ijanderson (talk) 11:28, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
seems ive missed you mate, i should be online tomorrow afternoon my time. Regards Ijanderson (talk) 22:50, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Nielsen

Oh, I completely agree with you, Nielsen is trying to keep information from the Wikipedian public....but, so it didn't look like I was getting to pointy, I was "nice" on the post there. If you would like to add something with a little more punch (not too much, don't want you to get in trouble), please feel free. Take Care and Have a Good Weekend...NeutralHomerTalk • October 11, 2008 @ 13:23

Perfect! Gets the point we all are trying to make across without making anyone upset. I like it :) Take Care...NeutralHomerTalk • October 11, 2008 @ 17:13
See, that's where the problem lies. All the legal department won't tell us even the very short version of what the OTRS ticket (the thing that caused the whole deletions to begin with) says. Some privacy thing. So, we are kinda left in the dark, I think intentionally, to rebuild everything. Alot of people are using regional information, like for "Washington DC" they are calling it "the greater Washington DC area", for "Johnstown/Altoona" it's "Central Pennsylvania and Happy Valley" and as people make templates with previous information, people are coming by and kinda "regionalizing" them.
So....I would wait until the templates are finished (which might take a couple) then rebuild the list with that information and not anything from Nielsen. Right now, most people are not having anything to do with Nielsen information. Please feel free to message back :) Take Care and Have a Great Sunday...NeutralHomerTalk • October 12, 2008 @ 19:53

Its been too long

When are you going to be online next mate? Ijanderson (talk) 17:56, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

your not online now? :( Ijanderson (talk) 22:14, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
get online dude Ijanderson (talk) 14:33, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Missions in Taipei

A contributor has suggested that diplomatic missions in Taipei belonging to sending states that do not recognise the Republic of China should not be listed with a flag of the Republic of China, should be referred to as "Taiwan" and should contain a caveat specifying sending state does not recognise the Republic of China. While he has made this change to Diplomatic missions of Ireland, it would be appropriate that whatever decision to made to this article also is made in all the other DMBC articles (both the receiving and sending articles).

  • I am against removing Taiwan's flag to the exclusion of others.
  • I am against including caveats about the status of diplomatic relations, as this is not central to articles about diplomatic missions
  • I am against a change to the self-identification principle, in which receiving states are listed according to their own name. I however acknowledge there is inconsistency in the application of this rule and would reconsider my position if there is strong support to apply the logical alternative (receiving states are named according to how sending states know them). This decision however is fiddlier and would put us in direct conflict with Taiwanese (and Macedonians) who would have other agendas.

In short it is not worth the extra work, and I am not certain that this new contributor is prepared for all the extra work (and edit wars) his change entails. Please provide your views in Talk:Diplomatic missions of Ireland

MSN

Are you online mate? Regards Ijanderson (talk) 16:05, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Embassy of Iceland in Nicaragua

Hi, just letting you know that there is an embassy of Iceland in Managua, Nicaragua. You can find the information here: Embassy in Nicaragua Aquintero (talk) 17:11, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Here's a list of all embassies in Managua on the website of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Nicaragua. list Aquintero (talk) 20:00, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Solomon Islands has recognised Kosovo

Hi Bobby, I've received an reply from the Solomon Islands Director of Immigration confirming that they have recognised the independence of Kosovo, and its passports. See here. (I'm feeling rather proud with myself!) Have you received a reply to your email also? Now all we need to do is convince people that this isn't OR... I've forwarded the mail to Kosovothanksyou - perhaps they will manage to get hold of something more official. Cheers Bazonka (talk) 21:34, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please help me with something similiar?Max Mux (talk) 11:58, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It has been about six months since Russavia's proposed new bold format was developed, using a table, smaller pictures, names of heads of missions and cross accreditations. We did not come to any consensus about using it - but it was a good opportunity to see how it would look. May I also add we were worn down by Russavia's persistence that his design stay, that we redo the taxonomy of the DMBC articles ("by sending state", "by receiving state"), and we allow all those articles of Russian missions (and missions to Russia) to exist, even if they just consist of the name of the ambassador and its address.

I am still not convinced that the design of Russavia's format is an improvement on the existing design, or that these articles are the right place to list heads of missions or accreditations. I have not seen any significant endorsement of his new format, nor anybody stating they wanted to make wholesale changes to all articles.

Please note what the Arbitration Committee states about MoS conflicts:

The Arbitration Committee has ruled that the Manual of Style is not binding, that editors should not change an article from one guideline-defined style to another without a substantial reason unrelated to mere choice of style, and that revert-warring over optional styles is unacceptable.

Where there is disagreement over which style to use in an article, defer to the style used by the first major contributor.

As the first major contributor of this article I intend now to revert the article back to its original style, including any subsequent updates.

Please add your views in the talk page of Diplomatic missions of Russia.

Kransky (talk) 03:51, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Chat?

I really would mate but I've got an essay due in on Fri morn on the Great Schism, its worth 30% of my module. Only started it 2 hours ago. Sorry mate. Did you get my letter btw? Ijanderson (talk) 21:25, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Come on msn please Ijanderson (talk) 19:10, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[5] Ijanderson (talk) 09:17, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
MSN mate? Ijanderson (talk) 12:53, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Come on msn mate Ijanderson (talk) 16:44, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kosovo

I haven't posted anything that is not important!Max Mux (talk) 18:50, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Call to Arms

Create a Rep of Kosova/o page. Kosova is a state with a disputed sovereignty...not a disputed territory aka disputed land. I need your help to create ROK since there is none. PS, I hate dab, dab suck hah lol. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.106.61.194 (talk) 00:23, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"Popped up out of nowhere"

I did not pop up out of nowhere. I made edits to a Cypriot section of an article, as I have done many times before. In response my edits were reverted first without explanation and then with an insult. You should maybe try looking at a situation before insulting people. Vizjim (talk) 09:54, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: others...

hahaha that was funny! :) Btw, I'm from Chicago but I'm currently overseas on a job assignment. --alchaemia (talk) 23:05, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kosovo Passport Template

Bobby, could you please go here [[6]] and make your opinion known? They want to lump Kosovo under Serbia and they (Avala and Hexagon) are claiming that they have "consensus" even though it's only two of them talking about it. Thanks. --alchaemia (talk) 12:34, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed Removal of all non de jure diplomatic Missions in List Articles

I would like to seek your view as to whether we should eliminate from the lists of diplomatic missions by sending/receiving countries all references to representative offices of sending states that do not have formal diplomatic missions with the host states. This would affect a large number of articles which relate to Taiwan, Palestine, Kosovo and other states. Please provide your views here. Thank you. Kransky (talk) 06:38, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey

I saw that you are active on Foreign relations of Montenegro article, could you say what do you think of my suggestion, I wrote it on talk page. Best regards! Rave92(talk) 19:56, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kosovan passport, Passport Note

You have new message/s Hello. You have a new message at Talk:Kosovan passport's talk page. kedadial 19:34, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Diplomatic missions of the European Union

User:Alinor An editor with a keen interest in the EU has proposed to modify the article to list all the countries that do not have a mission of an EU member state, or only have one such mission. I do not support this edit, as the information does not concern diplomatic missions of the EU, only the missions of its member staets.

We have discussed this issue extensively in Talk:List of diplomatic missions of the European Union. I think what Alinor is arguing is that the embassy of an EU member can represent the EU as a whole, or provide services to other EU members. I do not believe this is the case. And even if such arrangements exist, it would be outside the scope of the article.

If you feel inclined, please join the discussions, make your own mind up and share your views. Kransky (talk) 00:04, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Montenegro recognition

Hey, how are you? Thanks for updating the information about the states that recognized Montenegro even though it's not that much importing :) since it is not a problem, only diplomatic service need to inform states that MNE is independent :). Anyway what I wanted to ask you is that by the information I got, states that recognized Montenegro is 120, not 113. This is the information, which were presented officially by Montenegrin Government: http://www.balkaninsight.com/en/main/news/27446/

Could you please update the box. Thanks again!

Best regards.

Rave92(talk) 15:32, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a reviewer

This template must be substituted. Replace {{Pending changes reviewer granted ...}} with {{subst:Pending changes reviewer granted ...}}. Calmer Waters 19:11, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bobby with MA degree 2.JPG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bobby with MA degree 2.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --ARTEST4ECHO (talk|contribs) 15:57, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kosovo page

I don't know if it is vandalism as I don't remember that user being a regular editor, however it is hasty and should be reverted. At this point it is safe to doubt the news article as whomever spoke with journalists could have lied to them. Could you please contact diplomats of those two countries. Thanks.--Avala (talk) 23:37, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well it's not about Kosovo but about what Oman and Guinea-Bissau say. Do you maybe have some contacts in their embassies who could follow the story?--Avala (talk) 00:09, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please see my proposal and give your views and opinions

It is regarding "International recognition of Kosovo" and article size. It is not a POV proposal, just a purely technical matter regarding the KB size of the article which is currently too big. Please see my proposal here and give your views and opinions. Regards IJA (talk) 14:23, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Diplomatic Missions by Country articles

Hi Canadian Bobby, one new contributor would like the DMBC articles to list as diplomatic missions the representatives of Polisario, an organisation advocating for the Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic, within the Sahrawi DMBC article. I have no problems with genuine missions of the SADR being listed, but I think most of the representatives listed cannot be considered diplomatic missions under the loosest of definitions (such as the 19 in Spain). Do you think we should list as diplomatic missions the representatives of political organisations? Or do you think this would be a radical departure from the definitions we have been using? Feel free to investigate his side of the story at Talk:List of diplomatic missions of the Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic. Kransky (talk) Kransky (talk) 16:40, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

AfD for Chronology_of_diplomatic_recognitions_and_relations_of_South_Sudan

You participated in a related discussion before. The current one is here. Japinderum (talk) 11:52, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Republic of China article

Since you mentioned about the Republic of China in your user page, I guess you are interested to share your insights at Talk:Republic of China#Requested Move (February 2012). Thanks for your attention. 61.18.170.47 (talk) 17:02, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]