Jump to content

Wikipedia:Categories for deletion/Log/2006 April 14

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Doc glasgow (talk | contribs) at 10:38, 14 April 2006 ([[:Category:Establishments by year]] and all related sub cats: not useful). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

April 14

I stumbled upon this when a Scottish church denomination was categorised, and found that it had been out in a category with an Irish millitary regiment, a US university band, a railwoad company, and a Parisian writers' association - all unassociated except for their year of origin. Wikiperia is not an indiscriminate collection of information, so please delete these. --Doc ask? 09:58, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose. If it were a list article, I would be inclined to agree, but categorizing by date in some form seems reasonable to me. Should we also delete the "date births" and "date deaths" categories? Why not all the date related categories? — Eoghanacht talk 10:34, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
OK, so tell me what use this category could be to a reader, especialy if it developes to the point that you have every corporate entity on the encyclopedia so categorised? Let's not clutter articles with useless categories that distract from the useful ones. --Doc ask? 10:38, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Rename. Appears to have been a simple misspelling at the time the category was created. --Nlu (talk) 08:19, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

List it under requests for speedy renaming above. - Darwinek 08:27, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No, actually, it's about the Inheritance Trilogy, not about inheritance. Rename as such to Category:Inheritance Trilogy. Grutness...wha? 06:06, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

See: Category:Wagering, blanked by 2005 -- ProveIt (talk) 05:22, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Too narrow -- ProveIt (talk) 05:22, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Abandoned -- ProveIt (talk) 05:22, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
abandoned? Never used AFAIK. Speediable if it's been empty 48 hours, which seems very likely. Grutness...wha? 06:08, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
blanked by Visviva -- ProveIt (talk) 05:22, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Spam from Coach Marilyn -- ProveIt (talk) 05:22, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
blanked by creator -- ProveIt (talk) 05:22, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
See: Category:Rugby in Spain -- ProveIt (talk) 05:22, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
See: Category:Spanish futsal clubs -- ProveIt (talk) 05:22, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
blanked by creator -- ProveIt (talk) 05:22, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
blanked by Omniplex -- ProveIt (talk) 05:22, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There is already a category for this purpose, at Category:National Hockey League goalies who have scored in a game. Aottley 00:40, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

category with only one possible entry which is already in the parent category Sandpiper 00:37, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

misspelled, already at Category:Time Bomb Recordings albums Dan, the CowMan 00:49, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]