Jump to content

User talk:Tree Biting Conspiracy

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Computerjoe (talk | contribs) at 20:56, 17 April 2006 (community justice message using AWB). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Archives



Signature Question

I'd like to make mine a grey T, a maroon K and a grey E with just a talk tab. How dunnit? I know nothing about coding, and I tried practicing in my preferences. Could you help? TKE 02:43, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No I don't, but I'm a quick study. I was viewing other sources and trying to figure it out, such as yours since it's also three letters. If you can give me a step guide, I can do it! TKE 02:48, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Right, the problem was not using the Raw signature! Okay, talk in red? TKE 03:01, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
Sorry, got distracted. Now, I've got it how I like it. I tried to add the superscript, but got an HTML conflict. What do I need if I just want talk in gray?TKE 03:21, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is fun, btw.

  • GRR, not any more. I've got TKE working fine. I'm trying to add the last bit, and getting an HTML error. Any idea of what's wrong? Otherwise, this suits me fine for now :) TKE 03:50, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • I can put it in here and it works? This is nuts. Talk
  • Damn. I copied and pasted. 'S okay, I'll leave it without the talk. Thanks for the help!

Military history WikiProject Newsletter, Issue I

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter
Issue I - March 2006
Project news
From the Coordinators

Welcome to the inaugural issue of the Military history WikiProject's newsletter! We hope that this new format will help members—especially those who may be unable to keep up with some of the rapid developments that tend to occur—find new groups and programs within the project that they may wish to participate in.

Please consider this inital issue to be a prototype; as always, any comments and suggestions are quite welcome, and will help us improve the newsletter in the coming months.

Kirill Lokshin, Lead Coordinator

Current proposals

delivered by Loopy e 05:52, 30 March 2006 (UTC) [reply]

Denvilles railway station

Hiya you voted "Delete" on the Denvilles railway station article. I've provided a new source and possible explanation for the lack of other verification. Could you please review your vote? I appreciate that you may not want to change it after seeing the evidence, of course! Vizjim 10:38, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Portal Updates

Since you're spending time on food, I'll be more than happy to update Theatre. *Exeunt* Ganymead | Dialogue? 15:21, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks from a lurker

Hi! I wanted to thank you for the welcome message you left on my talk page; the information it has is quite useful. --Tyrdium 00:22, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Good job!

Good job on Afds!--Tdxiang 陈 鼎 翔 (Talk)ContributionsContributions Chat with Tdxiang on IRC! 05:06, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Arab Israeli Conflict

Just so you know, out of my grace I decided to not eliminate you with everyone else. Bow down to me. T K E 07:59, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think the sad thing is that I do get it. Nothing like an oxbow lake to get a conversation started. I'm off for a day, doing a lame April Fools in the meantime. Bienvue! T K E 08:31, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Hello TBC, how are you? Thanks for your support in my RFA. The final vote count was (88/3/1), so I am now an administrator. Please let me know if at any stage you require assistance, or if you have comments on how I am doing as an administrator. Once again thank you and with kind regards Gryffindor 17:18, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your interest in using VandalProof. I've added you to the safe list, and I will let you know as soon as a download becomes availabe (which will hopefully be before the end of the week). AmiDaniel (Talk) 06:13, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RFA Thanks

Thank you for your support vote on my RFA. The final result was a successful request based on 111 support and 1 oppose. --CBDunkerson 11:08, 3 April 2006 (UTC) [reply]

User talk:Tomkurts

Your welcome at User talk:Tomkurts accidentally included the {{helpme}} template - can you find out why?--Commander Keane 02:25, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It appears, as I wrote to CK here, that the "code" "/code" syntax was inadvertently removed by an editor using AWB for cleanup, resulting in the display of otherwise suppressed templates. Joe 02:34, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Yep thanks to Joe we have found the problem. Sorry for the disturbance.--Commander Keane 02:39, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My RfA

Hi TBC. Just a quick note to thank you for your support in my RfA, which recently passed 62/13/6. I will do my very best live up to this new responsibility and to serve the community, but please let me know if I make any mistakes or if you have any feedback at all on my actions. Finally, if there is anything that I can assist you with - please don't hesitate to ask. Cheers TigerShark 03:35, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Rfa?

Well, hi again, Afd master. I hope to nominate you for adminship. But fisrt, do tell me if you don't feel good about it. But ofcourse I do hope you'll accept! Leave me a message first. Thank you.--Tdxiang 陈 鼎 翔 (Talk)Contributions Chat with Tdxiang on IRC! 09:46, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings. I have made a series of contributions to the Humayun article, and was hoping you could take a look and make any fixes or additions you may feel are needed. Thanks. --Irishpunktom\talk 15:25, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A Download Is Now Available

I just wanted to let you know that a download of VandalProof has recently been made available. AmiDaniel (Talk) 09:51, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

VandalProof

Dude, I know. I use it too! Computerjoe's talk 08:59, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nintendo Wikiproject

Dear TBC, you recently logged a proposal to start a Nintendo Wikiproject, which has received 5 notes of support from various individuals. If you are interested in setting up this Wikiproject please tell me so as I'd like to help getting it started. Cheers, Highway Rainbow Sneakers 13:02, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

VandalProof Moderators

Thank you for your willingness in helping me out with VandalProof! You've now been made a moderator, so when you load VandalProof the next time, you should see 'Moderator' in front of your username, and you should also find the Moderate List item under the User Tools menu. I've made a very basic page explaining what's expected of moderators and how to do certain tasks, which can be found here: User:AmiDaniel/VandalProof/ModeratorTools. If you change your mind and don't want to moderate, please contact me. Again, thanks! AmiDaniel (Talk) 23:40, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Neopets Revision

Apparently, we reverted at the same time, and my revision undid your revision. I'm sorry about that. However, Tawkerbot2 undid my revision and the article is back to normal.—GH 01:38, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Moderating

Hi TBC. Yeah, I ran into similar (the same?) issues as you. I just left a note on AmiDaniel's talk page. I think I am going to hold back on approving users until AmiDaniel gets to take a look at things. --PS2pcGAMER (talk) 02:13, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Community Justice. Please take part in the meeting. Computerjoe's talk 06:54, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

General Mills characters

Alas, the name of Foxcat's category is probably slightly more correct; I don't think I've seen possessives used in a category name. But something like that should have gone through WP:CFR. I'll have a word with him, for all the good that'll do... tregoweth 15:42, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merge Vote on Ultraviolet map

Hi I was thinking about taking this whole merge discussion in an entirely different direction. Instead of merging the info on the poorly named Ultraviolet map into the unfocused The DHARMA Initiative. How about we expand on Silentplanet's idea and create sub sections on known Hatches?

Remember the "The DHARMA Initiative" article is supposed to focus on what it is. Adding more information to "the Swan" only shows that this hatch should be expanded upon in another article. The title of this article after all is not "The DHARMA Hatches." To me it looks like we should put in some information about what exactly the DHARMA Initiative is. We should give some history on it maybe include the information on the film and then some brief information about the hatches and what they are. Hatches that we know more about like "The Swan" should have its own page that would then contain information such as "the Map", "The Timer", etc... I think that this is a more reasonable solution and would also make it a more logical solution as an encyclopedia article. Please let me know what you think (in your talk page)! And if you do agree please note that on your merge vote! Thanks -- UKPhoenix79 04:09, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Attention Moderators!

Due to technical problems, I've removed all moderators other than myself. This bugs will be fixed in the next release, likely on Saturday, and I will then add you back as moderators. AmiDaniel (Talk) 22:46, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

VandalProof 1.1 is Now Available For Download

Happy Easter to all of you, and I hope that this version may fix your current problems and perhaps provide you with a few useful new tools. You can download version 1.1 at User:AmiDaniel/VandalProof. Let me warn you, however, to please be extremely careful when using the new Rollback All Contributions feature, as, aside from the excessive server lag it would cause if everyone began using it at once, it could seriously aggitate several editors to have their contributions reverted. If you would like to experiment with it, though, I'd be more than happy to use my many sockpuppets to create some "vandalism" for you to revert. If you have any problems downloading, installing, or otherwise, please tell me about them at User:AmiDaniel/VP/Bugs and I will do my best to help you. Thanks. AmiDaniel (Talk) 06:50, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

VandalProof

Hi, I decided to try out VandalProof (I currently use VandalFighter instead). I saw you were online, so could you add me to the list? By the way, it says you are most frequently online from 1:00 - 8:00 UTC. That's 8:00 PM - 3:00 AM (or 9 - 4 for DST). You're on until 3 AM ?!?!?! --M@thwiz2020 14:04, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm just curious, but you left Benon a welcome message to VandalProof (3, actually) saying you added him to the list but, in the past 10 minutes since the welcome, he remains on the "awaiting approval" list. --M@thwiz2020 14:24, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hm, that's an odd bug. Well, you better go to sleep at a reasonable time tonight, at least. --M@thwiz2020 14:28, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

VandalProof

Only when I've been welcoming multiple users. Computerjoe's talk 20:49, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As Wikipedia:Community Justice has over 30 members, we are beginning the elections process.

If you are interested in becoming the chairman, the chief executive or councillor please add yourself, and a statement, to Wikipedia:Community Justice/Elections.

Voting shall begin on April 24th, and end on May 1st. To see if you are eligible for a vote, please see Wikipedia:Community Justice/Elections.

Thank you,

Computerjoe's talk 20:56, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]