Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Researchers questioning the official account of 9/11
Appearance
non-notable fringe conspiracy theories have no place here, also they're hardly reasearchers anyway-RCT 04:42, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
- delete blatent misuse of an encyclopedia to campaign for the DNC by pushing insane conspiracy theories, soapboxing for fringe idiots isn't the job of a wikipedia article-RCT 04:42, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
- Keep, this isn't an endorsement of their theories, merely documentation of them. There are plenty of notable alternate theories, whether they're credible or not. --W(t) 04:45, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
- Keep per W(t). I remember that this was AfDed already (see also article talk), but can't find a link. Anyway, I am all for deleting non-notable conspiracycruft, but we do need to have a place to merge the individual conspiracystubs to that crop up from time to time. Sandstein 04:52, 22 April 2006 (UTC)