Talk:Armavia Flight 967

220.233.176.13 10:51, 3 May 2006 (UTC) - Multiple sources (Russian Govt, Airbus) have contradictory information[reply]

Why is this encyclopedic? Lots of planes have crashed over the years. - Brian Kendig 14:16, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

And a large number of them have been documented in Wikipedia _└^UkPaolo/_talk^┐ 14:45, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

True, I agree with UkPaolo. Besides, plane crashes are not that common nowadays. --S iva1979^{Talk to me} 16:58, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I concur as well, it is worthy of an article. Can someone please verify the times? The way it reads right now it was a 15 minute flight. Is that true? Davidpdx 18:20, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It was true that it took off at 1:45 local and was to land at 2:00 local. However, even though it was going north, Russia and Armenia are in different time zones. I'll fix the article. --Golbez 18:48, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Article revision deletion

I have removed one revision from this page's history because it (and its edit summary) contained personally idenfitiable information of a person. - Mark 02:35, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Protection

Was it really appropriate to put this article under protection after one vandalism? Quite often we go through 5 or 6 vandalisms before we do that. As the situation continues, I think anyone should be able to edit it. Please let me know if I missed something. Clarkefreak ∞ 03:23, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, there were several others that contained personal information about a Wikipedia member, so they were removed from the article's history. In light of that, semiprot is indeed reasonable. --Golbez 03:45, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Copyright Violation

I hope that someone contacted the photographer of this photo directly as many photographers on airliners.net have gotten very upset by the unauthorized usage of their images-Reid A. 03:47, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]