Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of musicians from Minnesota
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Magister Mathematicae (talk | contribs) at 01:58, 5 May 2006 (Closing debate; result was delete). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 01:58, 5 May 2006 by Magister Mathematicae (talk | contribs) (Closing debate; result was delete)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. -- ( drini's page ☎ ) 01:58, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This was deleted under prod and then recreated. I think it should be considered by the community, whether it's a useful maintainable list, or one that would be better handled with Category:Minnesota musicians and Category:Minnesota musical groups. No vote. GTBacchus(talk) 18:23, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as redundant, per nom. RGTraynor 19:20, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: "This was deleted under prod and then recreated"... doesn't that make it speedy-able under CSD G4? Is it a exact copy of the original category before deletion? Kimchi.sg | talk 21:03, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- That makes it absolutely not G4 speediable. A big part of the point of Wikipedia:Proposed deletion is that prodded articles may be recreated without prejudice. -GTBacchus(talk) 21:10, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- It depends. It could enable us to develop a list of notable musicians from Minnesota. At the start of my time here, I worked on developing the List of Australian musicians with many highly notable Australian artists lacking articles. This has been fixed now. On the other hand, it could be a target for red links of non-notable bands saying Prince is listed so we should be to. Capitalistroadster 21:48, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- I guess I would suggest that, if we just want a list of redlinks to indicate articles that need to be written, then a page at WP:MEA might be a better way to maintain that than a list article. -GTBacchus(talk) 21:57, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. A category is fine, but this is an unmaintainable list of musicians that threatens to generate a pile of articles about nn-bands, i.e. listcruft. Stifle (talk) 16:37, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.