Jump to content

User:Beland

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Beland (talk | contribs) at 04:52, 20 August 2004 (Policy questions). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Top priority

Politics

Sexuality

Multi-determination: A car owner notices the check engine light on their dashboard is on, but continues driving for 3 days. On the highway, the engine suddenly fails. A second car that has been tailgating crashes into the first one. A nearby philosopher asks whether the cause of the accident was the way the car was built, or the way it was operated by the owner. In fact, if the car had been built differently, operated differently, or followed differently, the accident would not have happened. The accident is "multi-determined". Cite that STS book.

Science

  • Elminate "fluid" metaphor from Electromagnetic field
    • E, B -> EMF -> EW -> QED -> Standard Model
    • Electromagnetic field should say it's part of electroweak theory and is special relativity-compliant.
    • Electric_field should say that it's part of EM/electroweak theory/standard
  • Peer-review Scientific_method and read Talk:Scientific_method
  • Scientific_skepticism: Categorize, check for accuracy, NPOV. Add to official list of Controversial topics?

Easy Meta Tasks

  • Special:Longpages (May need chopping up)
    • Are these listed for cleanup anywhere individually? Is this page pointed to with that in mind?

Supreme Court History project

West Springfield/Pioneer Valley History

  • Obtained source materials
  • Extract and summarize
  • Post full text of non-copyrighted content?

Meta-Categorization

Policy questions

  • Construct an automated tool to enforce the same-name article-category rule, if it's approved?

Initial categorization and conversion from "See also"

  • Convert all "See also" sections in to category associations (unless there's a good reason not to).
  • Do the same for "Related lists" sections as "See also".
  • To convert manually, for each item on the "See also" list, make sure that both the referred and referring articles are members in common of at least one category. Or, if they aren't that closely related, then make sure they are both members of "nearby" categories which are connected by intuitive links. (It may not be possible or easy to replace a given reference with the category system; skip and move on.) Then, delete any "See also" links you were able to obviate with category assignment.
  • Electromagnetic field, Electroweak force, Fundamental force, SU(3)XSU(2)XU(1), Standard_Model
    • E, B -> EMF -> EW -> QED -> Standard Model
  • Link from/to Category:Orphaned categories.

Fundamental automation

  • Construct an automated tool for hierarchical view of categories.
  • Post a dump periodically

See also automation

  • Construct an automated tool to find all See also: sections, and create a list of clusters (to be used as suggestions).
  • Clustering
    • Consider common See also links
    • Consider common categories
    • Don't consider "What links here"
  • Dump results onto a Wiki page.
  • Make a wiki-editable list of "Articles that intentionally have See also sections". The tool should ignore these.

Categorization automation

  • Produce a list of articles that have no associated category that aren't covered by "See also automation".
  • Cluster by "What links here"
  • Post this as a list of suggestions for category initialization
  • Special:Deadendpages (Don't have any inbound links?)
  • Suggest categories by content similarity? Or maybe this should be done manually.

Redirect automation

  • Find all double-redirects
  • Post a list
  • Write a bot that can automatically fix them.
  • Ask for permission to fix them automatically.
  • Find all redirects
  • Write a bot that can automatically fix them.
  • Ask for permission to fix them automatically.

Fixme automation

  • Write a bot to find all instances of the string FIXME in live pages?

Random Topics

United States Categorization

Random peer review

Science

Politics

Controversial

General interest

Problems

Readme