Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rebel Media Group
Appearance
Seems to fail WP:WEB substantially. Delete Mak (talk) 04:22, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
- Don't delete - unsubstiated non-compliance claim by Mak --Andrewwinkler 04:32, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
- Note - Andrew Winkler is apparently the editor/publisher of The Rebel Media Group Kevin 04:46, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
- Comment What do you mean? It does not follow Wikipedia guidelines. Would you like me to spell it out more specifically? I can't find any instances of it being covered in any outside, unaffiliated media. It doesn't seem to have won any awards. It is not distributed by a well known media group. The onus is on the creator of the article to provide evidence of such things. Substantiate your own claims. Mak (talk) 04:42, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
- Reply not covered by outside, unaffiliated media? how long did that take you to work out? It's obviously wrong. And how is a web site supposed to be distributed by a 'well known media group' (you probably mean kosher)?— Preceding unsigned comment added by Andrewwinkler (talk • contribs)
- Delete nn forum, about six months old, Alexa rank 587,498. Fan1967 04:42, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
- Reply nn site? Typical Zio smear. Being critical of Israel, Zionism and the Holocaust industry doesn't make you a nn. Or would you call Gideo Levy, Finkelstein or Chomsky nn, too? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Andrewwinkler (talk
- Comment: the abbreviation "nn" means "non-notable" or "not notable", in case that was unclear. -- Kjkolb 09:36, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. WP:WEB asks for "multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the site itself". I see no evidence of that. Kevin 04:47, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
- Reply I can provide that, no worries... Anything else required?
- Yes. Rewrite it so that it doesn't sound like advertising. And please sign your comments. Paddles 14:01, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. nn WP:WEB.--blue520 05:04, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
- Reply Zio smear— Preceding unsigned comment added by Andrewwinkler (talk • contribs)
- Reply It must be a very sad, sad world you live in, where everyone who disagrees with you is part of the "Zio" conspiracy. Fan1967 16:51, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete fails WP:WEB -- Samir धर्म 07:11, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
- Reply unsubstantiated— Preceding unsigned comment added by Andrewwinkler (talk • contribs)
- Comment. You keep saying that. If you read WP:WEB you will notice that it is sufficient for an AfD voter to assert that it fails WP:WEB. It is up to the editors of the article in question to disprove the claim that it fails WP:WEB by proving (i.e. supplying, in the article) suitable references of the type described in WP:WEB. To date, you have not done this. Paddles 14:01, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
- Reply So what you are saying is that the accused has to prove his innocence?! You got to be kidding.--Andrewwinkler 02:19, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Looks like they are trying to use Wikipedia to promote themselves. This is too new and small to be considered notable. --Dakart 08:18, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. I don't really care whether it's a tool of Time-Warner or the Zionist or whatever, but there's no evidence that anyone is actually reading this. No coverage in outside news sources plus an awful Alexa rating adds up to nn site. (By the way, it would totally make my day if the original author called me a tool of the Zionists or something; I haven't been accused of serving my Jewish conspiratorial masters enough lately. ¬_¬) - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 08:57, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
- A secret cabal of bankers and industrialists are ordering me to vote Delete on grounds of complete un-notability. But they can't make me like it. Vizjim 09:23, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
- Don't delete, I disagree on the notability thing: rebel media group is listed on the first two positions of page one on google search and on 1st and 9th position on yahoo serach. [Rebel Media Group] is mentioned on [[1]], [[2]], [[3]], [[4]], [[5]], all in the first 10 pages on Google. I didnt' have any problems finding mentioning on other search engines either. I wonder how all the previous posters came up with this non-notability finding. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 202.67.86.237 (talk • contribs) .
- Comment. In case you are a different person to the above, please sign your comments. It's very easy - just add four tilde characters at the end of your comment. Paddles 14:01, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. It's an open-and-shut case, with no right of appeal. --Agamemnon2 10:36, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Being found by Google does not make you notable. TheMadBaron 12:48, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per secret cabal of Zionist bankers, hairdressers, and interior decorators. AnonEMouse 13:03, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Advertising for an nn site = byebye. Also, I greatly enjoy AnonEMouse's deletion vote. -- Kicking222 13:32, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per Kicking222. Paddles 14:01, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Incredibly non notable. As for the links provided above, one is for a webforum, one is an article written by the founder of the site about the site, one is a links page, and the other two are passing mentions on non notable websites. IrishGuy 17:06, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy delete typical attack site ⇒ SWATJester Ready Aim Fire! 22:58, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete just like ziopedia. M1ss1ontomars2k4 | T | C | @ 23:57, 17 May 2006 (UTC)